Comparing Statistical, Analytical, and Learning-Based Routing Approaches for Delay-Tolerant Networks

IF 0.7 4区 计算机科学 Q4 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Pedro R. D'Argenio, Juan Fraire, Arnd Hartmanns, Fernando Raverta
{"title":"Comparing Statistical, Analytical, and Learning-Based Routing Approaches for Delay-Tolerant Networks","authors":"Pedro R. D'Argenio, Juan Fraire, Arnd Hartmanns, Fernando Raverta","doi":"10.1145/3665927","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In delay-tolerant networks (DTNs) with uncertain contact plans, the communication episodes and their reliabilities are known a priori. To maximise the end-to-end delivery probability, a bounded network-wide number of message copies are allowed. The resulting multi-copy routing optimization problem is naturally modelled as a Markov decision process with distributed information. In this paper, we provide an in-depth comparison of three solution approaches: statistical model checking with scheduler sampling, the analytical RUCoP algorithm based on probabilistic model checking, and an implementation of concurrent Q-learning. We use an extensive benchmark set comprising random networks, scalable binomial topologies, and realistic ring-road low Earth orbit satellite networks. We evaluate the obtained message delivery probabilities as well as the computational effort. Our results show that all three approaches are suitable tools for obtaining reliable routes in DTN, and expose a trade-off between scalability and solution quality.</p>","PeriodicalId":50943,"journal":{"name":"ACM Transactions on Modeling and Computer Simulation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Transactions on Modeling and Computer Simulation","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3665927","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In delay-tolerant networks (DTNs) with uncertain contact plans, the communication episodes and their reliabilities are known a priori. To maximise the end-to-end delivery probability, a bounded network-wide number of message copies are allowed. The resulting multi-copy routing optimization problem is naturally modelled as a Markov decision process with distributed information. In this paper, we provide an in-depth comparison of three solution approaches: statistical model checking with scheduler sampling, the analytical RUCoP algorithm based on probabilistic model checking, and an implementation of concurrent Q-learning. We use an extensive benchmark set comprising random networks, scalable binomial topologies, and realistic ring-road low Earth orbit satellite networks. We evaluate the obtained message delivery probabilities as well as the computational effort. Our results show that all three approaches are suitable tools for obtaining reliable routes in DTN, and expose a trade-off between scalability and solution quality.

比较耐延迟网络的统计、分析和基于学习的路由选择方法
在具有不确定联络计划的容错网络(DTN)中,通信事件及其可靠性是先验已知的。为了最大限度地提高端到端交付概率,允许在全网范围内使用一定数量的信息副本。由此产生的多副本路由优化问题自然被模拟成一个具有分布式信息的马尔可夫决策过程。在本文中,我们深入比较了三种解决方法:带有调度器采样的统计模型检查、基于概率模型检查的分析 RUCoP 算法以及并发 Q-learning 的实现。我们使用了一个广泛的基准集,其中包括随机网络、可扩展的二叉拓扑结构和现实的环路低地球轨道卫星网络。我们对所获得的信息传递概率和计算工作量进行了评估。我们的结果表明,这三种方法都是在 DTN 中获取可靠路由的合适工具,并揭示了可扩展性和解决方案质量之间的权衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACM Transactions on Modeling and Computer Simulation
ACM Transactions on Modeling and Computer Simulation 工程技术-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
22.20%
发文量
29
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The ACM Transactions on Modeling and Computer Simulation (TOMACS) provides a single archival source for the publication of high-quality research and developmental results referring to all phases of the modeling and simulation life cycle. The subjects of emphasis are discrete event simulation, combined discrete and continuous simulation, as well as Monte Carlo methods. The use of simulation techniques is pervasive, extending to virtually all the sciences. TOMACS serves to enhance the understanding, improve the practice, and increase the utilization of computer simulation. Submissions should contribute to the realization of these objectives, and papers treating applications should stress their contributions vis-á-vis these objectives.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信