Assistive technology on upper extremity function for stroke patients: A systematic review with meta-analysis

Abstract

Background

In stroke rehabilitation, the selection of appropriate assistive devices is of paramount importance for patients. Specifically, the choice of device can significantly influence the functional recovery of the upper limb, impacting their overall activities or functional tasks.

Objectives

This review aimed to comprehensively analyze and summarize the clinical evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) regarding the therapeutic effects of commonly used assistive devices on upper extremity function in patients with stroke.

Methods

To evaluate assistive devices for patients with stroke, we summarized qualitatively throughout synthesis of results, such as therapeutic intervention, intensity, outcome, and summary of results, and examined risk of bias, heterogeneity, mean difference, 95% confidence interval, and I-squared value. To analyze, we used RoB 2 and RevMan 5.4.

Results

The qualitative synthesis included 31 RCTs. The randomization process and the reporting of results showed minimal bias, but there were issues with bias from intended interventions, and missing outcome data presented some concerns. The quantitative synthesis included 16 RCTs. There was a significant difference in the Fugl-Meyer assessment-upper extremity functioning (FMA-UE) scores between the groups, with a total mean difference (95% confidence interval) of 2.40 (0.21, 4.60), heterogeneity values were Tau² = 0.32, chi-square = 8.22, degrees of freedom = 8 (p = 0.41), and I² = 3% for FMA-UE and the test for the overall effect produced Z = 2.14 (p = 0.03) in patients with chronic stroke. However, there was no significant difference in all other outcome measures.

Conclusions

Upper-limb robots did not demonstrate significant superiority over conventional treatments in improving function of upper limbs, with the exception of FMA-UE scores for patients with chronic stroke. The mean difference of FMA-UE was also lower than minimally important difference. Nonetheless, the usage of upper-limb robots may contribute to enhanced function for patients with stroke, as those devices support clinicians and enable a greater number of movement repetitions within specific time frames.