Clinical evaluation of a deep learning CBCT auto-segmentation software for prostate adaptive radiation therapy

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Lorenzo Radici , Cristina Piva , Valeria Casanova Borca , Domenico Cante , Silvia Ferrario , Marina Paolini , Laura Cabras , Edoardo Petrucci , Pierfrancesco Franco , Maria Rosa La Porta , Massimo Pasquino
{"title":"Clinical evaluation of a deep learning CBCT auto-segmentation software for prostate adaptive radiation therapy","authors":"Lorenzo Radici ,&nbsp;Cristina Piva ,&nbsp;Valeria Casanova Borca ,&nbsp;Domenico Cante ,&nbsp;Silvia Ferrario ,&nbsp;Marina Paolini ,&nbsp;Laura Cabras ,&nbsp;Edoardo Petrucci ,&nbsp;Pierfrancesco Franco ,&nbsp;Maria Rosa La Porta ,&nbsp;Massimo Pasquino","doi":"10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100796","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Aim of the present study is to characterize a deep learning-based auto-segmentation software (DL) for prostate cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images and to evaluate its applicability in clinical adaptive radiation therapy routine.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>Ten patients, who received exclusive radiation therapy with definitive intent on the prostate gland and seminal vesicles, were selected. Femoral heads, bladder, rectum, prostate, and seminal vesicles were retrospectively contoured by four different expert radiation oncologists on patients CBCT, acquired during treatment. Consensus contours (CC) were generated starting from these data and compared with those created by DL with different algorithms, trained on CBCT (DL-CBCT) or computed tomography (DL-CT). Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), centre of mass (COM) shift and volume relative variation (VRV) were chosen as comparison metrics. Since no tolerance limit can be defined, results were also compared with the inter-operator variability (IOV), using the same metrics.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The best agreement between DL and CC was observed for femoral heads (DSC of 0.96 for both DL-CBCT and DL-CT). Performance worsened for low-contrast soft tissue organs: the worst results were found for seminal vesicles (DSC of 0.70 and 0.59 for DL-CBCT and DL-CT, respectively). The analysis shows that it is appropriate to use algorithms trained on the specific imaging modality. Furthermore, the statistical analysis showed that, for almost all considered structures, there is no significant difference between DL-CBCT and human operator in terms of IOV.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The accuracy of DL-CBCT is in accordance with CC; its use in clinical practice is justified by the comparison with the inter-operator variability.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10342,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology","volume":"47 ","pages":"Article 100796"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405630824000739/pdfft?md5=d28358333a8c4013e5b7e2d99d412a66&pid=1-s2.0-S2405630824000739-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405630824000739","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Aim of the present study is to characterize a deep learning-based auto-segmentation software (DL) for prostate cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images and to evaluate its applicability in clinical adaptive radiation therapy routine.

Materials and methods

Ten patients, who received exclusive radiation therapy with definitive intent on the prostate gland and seminal vesicles, were selected. Femoral heads, bladder, rectum, prostate, and seminal vesicles were retrospectively contoured by four different expert radiation oncologists on patients CBCT, acquired during treatment. Consensus contours (CC) were generated starting from these data and compared with those created by DL with different algorithms, trained on CBCT (DL-CBCT) or computed tomography (DL-CT). Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), centre of mass (COM) shift and volume relative variation (VRV) were chosen as comparison metrics. Since no tolerance limit can be defined, results were also compared with the inter-operator variability (IOV), using the same metrics.

Results

The best agreement between DL and CC was observed for femoral heads (DSC of 0.96 for both DL-CBCT and DL-CT). Performance worsened for low-contrast soft tissue organs: the worst results were found for seminal vesicles (DSC of 0.70 and 0.59 for DL-CBCT and DL-CT, respectively). The analysis shows that it is appropriate to use algorithms trained on the specific imaging modality. Furthermore, the statistical analysis showed that, for almost all considered structures, there is no significant difference between DL-CBCT and human operator in terms of IOV.

Conclusions

The accuracy of DL-CBCT is in accordance with CC; its use in clinical practice is justified by the comparison with the inter-operator variability.

用于前列腺自适应放射治疗的深度学习 CBCT 自动分割软件的临床评估
本研究旨在描述基于深度学习的前列腺锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)图像自动分割软件(DL)的特征,并评估其在临床自适应放射治疗常规中的适用性。由四位不同的放射肿瘤专家对患者在治疗期间获得的 CBCT 进行回顾性轮廓描绘,包括股骨头、膀胱、直肠、前列腺和精囊。根据这些数据生成共识轮廓(CC),并将其与使用不同算法、在 CBCT(DL-CBCT)或计算机断层扫描(DL-CT)上训练的 DL 创建的轮廓进行比较。比较指标包括骰子相似系数(DSC)、质量中心(COM)偏移和体积相对变化(VRV)。由于无法定义容差极限,因此也使用相同的指标将结果与操作者之间的变异性(IOV)进行比较。结果股骨头的 DL 和 CC 的一致性最好(DL-CBCT 和 DL-CT 的 DSC 均为 0.96)。对于低对比度的软组织器官,两者的一致性则有所下降:精囊的结果最差(DL-CBCT 和 DL-CT 的 DSC 分别为 0.70 和 0.59)。分析表明,使用针对特定成像模式训练的算法是合适的。结论 DL-CBCT 的准确性与 CC 一致;通过比较操作者之间的变异性,可以证明其在临床实践中的应用是合理的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology
Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
114
审稿时长
40 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信