FLUVOXAMINE VERSUS CLOMIPRAMINE FOR OBSESSIVE COMPULSIVE DISORDER: A COMPARATIVE STUDY TO DETERMINE SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF THE DRUGS

Anirudh Atul Salunke
{"title":"FLUVOXAMINE VERSUS CLOMIPRAMINE FOR OBSESSIVE COMPULSIVE DISORDER: A COMPARATIVE STUDY TO DETERMINE SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF THE DRUGS","authors":"Anirudh Atul Salunke","doi":"10.36106/ijsr/9606856","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The aim of this 12-week, blind randomized control comparative study was to determine the safety and efcacy of uvoxamine and\nclomipramine in adult outpatients with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Method: 156 adult outpatients with DSM-IV OCD were randomly\nassigned into two groups to receive 100 to 300 mg of uvoxamine CR (N=78) or Clomipramine (N = 78) once daily at bedtime for 12 weeks. Intentto-treat, analysis of efcacy assessments with the Yale- Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (YBOCS), Clinical Global Impressions-Severity of\nIllness scale (CGI-S) was done. Results: The percentage of responders (response >35% improvement in the YBOCS total score) at the end of the\nstudy was similar in both groups (62% FLV vs 65% CMI) by LOCF analysis. Fluvoxamine CR and Clomipramine showed a signicant (>35%)\ndecrease in YBOCS total score beginning at week 2. This early response was sustained at all subsequent visits. At endpoint, there was a mean\ndecrease of 11.65 ± 0.7 (44.89%) in the YBOCS total score compared with baseline in the uvoxamine CR treatment group versus a mean decrease\nof 12.3 ± 0.7 (46.32%) in the clomipramine treatment group (p = .001). It was observed that FLV was better tolerated than CMI among subjects;\npatients treated with CMI had more anticholinergic side effects (dry mouth, constipation, and tremor) and premature withdrawals due to adverse\nevents. CGI-S scores also showed a statistically signicant improvement of 59.25% in FLV group and 55.14% in CMI group. Conclusion: The\nstudy show that both uvoxamine and clomipramine has equivalent efcacy, wherein both the drugs start showing signicant reduction in primary\nefcacy parameters: YBOCS and CSI-S scores since the end of second week. Treatment dropout rate was higher in the Clomipramine (24%) group\nthan the uvoxamine (17%) group. We concluded that with long-term or even life- long treatment appearing necessary for people with OCD,\nFluvoxamine would appear to be the treatment of choice in view of their tolerability and safety advantages compared with clomipramine.","PeriodicalId":14358,"journal":{"name":"International journal of scientific research","volume":"46 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of scientific research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36106/ijsr/9606856","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this 12-week, blind randomized control comparative study was to determine the safety and efcacy of uvoxamine and clomipramine in adult outpatients with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Method: 156 adult outpatients with DSM-IV OCD were randomly assigned into two groups to receive 100 to 300 mg of uvoxamine CR (N=78) or Clomipramine (N = 78) once daily at bedtime for 12 weeks. Intentto-treat, analysis of efcacy assessments with the Yale- Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (YBOCS), Clinical Global Impressions-Severity of Illness scale (CGI-S) was done. Results: The percentage of responders (response >35% improvement in the YBOCS total score) at the end of the study was similar in both groups (62% FLV vs 65% CMI) by LOCF analysis. Fluvoxamine CR and Clomipramine showed a signicant (>35%) decrease in YBOCS total score beginning at week 2. This early response was sustained at all subsequent visits. At endpoint, there was a mean decrease of 11.65 ± 0.7 (44.89%) in the YBOCS total score compared with baseline in the uvoxamine CR treatment group versus a mean decrease of 12.3 ± 0.7 (46.32%) in the clomipramine treatment group (p = .001). It was observed that FLV was better tolerated than CMI among subjects; patients treated with CMI had more anticholinergic side effects (dry mouth, constipation, and tremor) and premature withdrawals due to adverse events. CGI-S scores also showed a statistically signicant improvement of 59.25% in FLV group and 55.14% in CMI group. Conclusion: The study show that both uvoxamine and clomipramine has equivalent efcacy, wherein both the drugs start showing signicant reduction in primary efcacy parameters: YBOCS and CSI-S scores since the end of second week. Treatment dropout rate was higher in the Clomipramine (24%) group than the uvoxamine (17%) group. We concluded that with long-term or even life- long treatment appearing necessary for people with OCD, Fluvoxamine would appear to be the treatment of choice in view of their tolerability and safety advantages compared with clomipramine.
氟伏沙明与氯米帕明治疗强迫症:确定药物安全性和有效性的比较研究
研究目的这项为期12周的盲法随机对照比较研究旨在确定uvoxamine和氯米帕明对成年门诊强迫症(OCD)患者的安全性和有效性。研究方法:156名患有DSM-IV强迫症的成年门诊患者被随机分为两组,分别接受100至300毫克的uvoxamine CR(78人)或氯米帕明(78人),每天一次,睡前服用,为期12周。采用耶鲁-布朗强迫症量表(YBOCS)、临床总体印象-疾病严重程度量表(CGI-S)进行意向性治疗、疗cacy评估分析。结果显示通过LOCF分析,研究结束时两组应答者(YBOCS总分改善>35%)的比例相似(62% FLV vs 65% CMI)。氟伏沙明(CR)和氯米帕明(Clomipramine)从第2周开始显示出YBOCS总分显著下降(>35%)。这种早期反应在随后的所有检查中都得到了维持。终点时,与基线相比,uvoxamine CR治疗组的YBOCS总分平均下降了11.65 ± 0.7(44.89%),而氯米帕明治疗组的YBOCS总分平均下降了12.3 ± 0.7(46.32%)(p = .001)。据观察,受试者对FLV的耐受性优于CMI;而接受CMI治疗的患者出现更多的抗胆碱能副作用(口干、便秘和震颤),并因不良反应而过早退出治疗。CGI-S评分也显示,FLV组和CMI组分别有59.25%和55.14%的显著改善。结论:研究表明,uvoxamine和氯米帕明具有同等的疗效,两种药物都能显著降低主要cacy参数:YBOCS和CSI-S评分。氯米帕明组(24%)的治疗退出率高于 uvoxamine 组(17%)。我们的结论是,鉴于强迫症患者需要长期甚至终身治疗,氟伏沙明与氯米帕明相比具有耐受性和安全性优势,因此似乎是治疗的首选。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信