In vitro analysis of various antibiotic and cement combinations against S. epidermidis and S. lugdunensis for treatment of periprosthetic shoulder infection

Q4 Medicine
{"title":"In vitro analysis of various antibiotic and cement combinations against S. epidermidis and S. lugdunensis for treatment of periprosthetic shoulder infection","authors":"","doi":"10.1053/j.sart.2024.04.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p><span><span><span>Periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) are devastating potential complications after </span>arthroplasty<span> surgery with significant therapeutic challenges. Many authors advocate for two-stage revision arthroplasty<span> for PJI of the shoulder which includes explanation with antibiotic spacer placement. The optimal antibiotic/cement combination for PJI in the shoulder is not known. The purpose of this study is to analyze various cement and antibiotic concentrations against </span></span></span>Coagulase negative staphylococcus species, </span><span><span>S. epidermidis</span></span> and <em>S. lugdunensis</em>.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p><span>Five strains of coagulase negative </span><em>Staph</em><span> were taken from clinically documented orthopedic infections<span><span><span> Both Simplex and Palacos cement were used to create antibiotic laden beads and mixed with either </span>ertapenem, </span>vancomycin<span>, gentamicin<span>, or a combination of ertapenem<span> + vancomycin<span> or ertapenem + gentamicin. The bacteria were plated on lysogeny broth agar plates and 3 beads were added per plate. Samples were analyzed for zone of inhibition at 24 hours, 72 hours, and 1 week. After 1 week, beads were transferred to new plates with bacteria and the process was repeated for 6 weeks.</span></span></span></span></span></span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Results showed that ertapenem beads with both Simplex and Palacos cement showed the largest zones of inhibition for all samples. Vancomycin in Palacos cement and vancomycin in combination with ertapenem in Simplex and Palacos cement showed consistent zones of inhibition for the duration of the experiments. Ertapenem in combination with either vancomycin or gentamicin may allow for a powerful initial burst of killing followed by consistent antibiotic elution as opposed to gentamicin alone.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>While many premade spacers on the market are infused with gentamicin, our in vitro models demonstrate more efficacious bacterial eradication for antibiotics such as ertapenem and vancomycin specifically for certain low virulence organisms that are commonly found in PJI around the shoulder.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":39885,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Arthroplasty","volume":"34 3","pages":"Pages 738-745"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Arthroplasty","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1045452724000646","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) are devastating potential complications after arthroplasty surgery with significant therapeutic challenges. Many authors advocate for two-stage revision arthroplasty for PJI of the shoulder which includes explanation with antibiotic spacer placement. The optimal antibiotic/cement combination for PJI in the shoulder is not known. The purpose of this study is to analyze various cement and antibiotic concentrations against Coagulase negative staphylococcus species, S. epidermidis and S. lugdunensis.

Methods

Five strains of coagulase negative Staph were taken from clinically documented orthopedic infections Both Simplex and Palacos cement were used to create antibiotic laden beads and mixed with either ertapenem, vancomycin, gentamicin, or a combination of ertapenem + vancomycin or ertapenem + gentamicin. The bacteria were plated on lysogeny broth agar plates and 3 beads were added per plate. Samples were analyzed for zone of inhibition at 24 hours, 72 hours, and 1 week. After 1 week, beads were transferred to new plates with bacteria and the process was repeated for 6 weeks.

Results

Results showed that ertapenem beads with both Simplex and Palacos cement showed the largest zones of inhibition for all samples. Vancomycin in Palacos cement and vancomycin in combination with ertapenem in Simplex and Palacos cement showed consistent zones of inhibition for the duration of the experiments. Ertapenem in combination with either vancomycin or gentamicin may allow for a powerful initial burst of killing followed by consistent antibiotic elution as opposed to gentamicin alone.

Conclusion

While many premade spacers on the market are infused with gentamicin, our in vitro models demonstrate more efficacious bacterial eradication for antibiotics such as ertapenem and vancomycin specifically for certain low virulence organisms that are commonly found in PJI around the shoulder.

针对表皮葡萄球菌和卢格杜纳菌的各种抗生素和骨水泥组合用于治疗假体周围肩关节感染的体外分析
背景假体关节感染(PJI)是关节置换手术后具有破坏性的潜在并发症,治疗难度很大。许多学者主张对肩关节 PJI 进行两阶段翻修关节置换术,其中包括对抗生素垫片置入进行解释。目前尚不清楚治疗肩关节 PJI 的最佳抗生素/水泥组合。本研究的目的是分析各种骨水泥和抗生素浓度对凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌、表皮葡萄球菌和卢格杜南葡萄球菌的作用。方法从临床记录的骨科感染病例中提取五株凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌,用 Simplex 和 Palacos 水泥制成含抗生素的微珠,并与厄他培南、万古霉素、庆大霉素或厄他培南+万古霉素或厄他培南+庆大霉素的组合混合。将细菌培养在溶菌肉汤琼脂平板上,每个平板加入 3 个微珠。分别在 24 小时、72 小时和 1 周后分析样品的抑菌区。结果结果表明,在所有样品中,使用 Simplex 和 Palacos 水泥的厄他培南珠显示出最大的抑菌区。Palacos 水泥中的万古霉素以及 Simplex 和 Palacos 水泥中万古霉素与厄他培南的组合在实验期间显示出一致的抑菌区。与单独使用庆大霉素相比,厄他培南与万古霉素或庆大霉素联合使用可能会产生强大的初始杀伤力,随后抗生素会被持续洗脱。结论虽然市场上许多预制垫片都注入了庆大霉素,但我们的体外模型显示,厄他培南和万古霉素等抗生素对肩周炎中常见的某些低毒性微生物的杀灭效果更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Seminars in Arthroplasty
Seminars in Arthroplasty Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
104
期刊介绍: Each issue of Seminars in Arthroplasty provides a comprehensive, current overview of a single topic in arthroplasty. The journal addresses orthopedic surgeons, providing authoritative reviews with emphasis on new developments relevant to their practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信