Economic Growth and Spatial Analysis in Transport Corridors: A Preliminary Review

IF 1 Q4 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
S. Lakhminarayanan, Shalini R. Nair, P. Chandrasekar
{"title":"Economic Growth and Spatial Analysis in Transport Corridors: A Preliminary Review","authors":"S. Lakhminarayanan, Shalini R. Nair, P. Chandrasekar","doi":"10.2478/jaes-2024-0014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The construction and development of international transport corridors have become a means of cross-border space governance, promoting the flexibility of international industrial chains and supply chains. Due to the uncertainty of cooperation, the development of international transport corridors entails a long-term and complex system of engineering. Transport corridors can generate wider economic benefits and costs through their effects on a potentially diverse set of development outcomes, such as economic growth, poverty, jobs, equity, environmental quality, and economic resilience. The focus on roads, rails, and waterways is justified, as transport corridors based on these modes have clearer potential for economic spillovers than, for example, airline routes. The current paper describes a multi-method approach involving spatial and non-spatial analysis to investigate spatial disparity along a proposed corridor and examine its integration within the existing settlement structure. The conceptual structure for the review is guided by a simple canonical model describing the policy maker’s problem in maximizing the net wider economic benefits of corridors. The meta-analysis confirms that characteristics of individual studies, as well as the placement and design of transport infrastructures, systematically influence the findings of corridor studies. It also shows that, on average, estimated impacts of corridor interventions on economic welfare and equity tend to be beneficial, while they are often detrimental to environmental quality, and possibly also to social inclusion.","PeriodicalId":44808,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Engineering Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Engineering Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/jaes-2024-0014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The construction and development of international transport corridors have become a means of cross-border space governance, promoting the flexibility of international industrial chains and supply chains. Due to the uncertainty of cooperation, the development of international transport corridors entails a long-term and complex system of engineering. Transport corridors can generate wider economic benefits and costs through their effects on a potentially diverse set of development outcomes, such as economic growth, poverty, jobs, equity, environmental quality, and economic resilience. The focus on roads, rails, and waterways is justified, as transport corridors based on these modes have clearer potential for economic spillovers than, for example, airline routes. The current paper describes a multi-method approach involving spatial and non-spatial analysis to investigate spatial disparity along a proposed corridor and examine its integration within the existing settlement structure. The conceptual structure for the review is guided by a simple canonical model describing the policy maker’s problem in maximizing the net wider economic benefits of corridors. The meta-analysis confirms that characteristics of individual studies, as well as the placement and design of transport infrastructures, systematically influence the findings of corridor studies. It also shows that, on average, estimated impacts of corridor interventions on economic welfare and equity tend to be beneficial, while they are often detrimental to environmental quality, and possibly also to social inclusion.
运输走廊的经济增长与空间分析:初步审查
国际运输走廊的建设和发展已成为跨境空间治理的一种手段,促进了国际产业链和供应链的灵活性。由于合作的不确定性,国际运输走廊的发展需要一个长期而复杂的工程系统。运输走廊对经济增长、贫困、就业、公平、环境质量和经济复原力等一系列潜在的发展成果产生影响,从而产生更广泛的经济效益和成本。重点关注公路、铁路和水路是合理的,因为与航空线路等相比,基于这些模式的运输走廊具有更明显的经济溢出效应潜力。本文介绍了一种涉及空间和非空间分析的多方法方法,以调查拟议走廊沿线的空间差异,并研究其在现有聚落结构中的整合情况。审查的概念结构以一个简单的典型模型为指导,该模型描述了政策制定者在实现走廊更广泛的净经济效益最大化方面所面临的问题。荟萃分析证实,单个研究的特点以及交通基础设施的布局和设计会系统地影响走廊研究的结果。它还表明,平均而言,走廊干预措施对经济福利和公平的估计影响往往是有利的,而对环境质量往往是不利的,也可能不利于社会包容。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
9.10%
发文量
18
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信