The use of LifeVac, a novel airway clearance device, in the assistance of choking victims aged five and under: Results of a retrospective 10-year observational study

Nicholas J. Costable, John M. Costable, Glenn Rabin
{"title":"The use of LifeVac, a novel airway clearance device, in the assistance of choking victims aged five and under: Results of a retrospective 10-year observational study","authors":"Nicholas J. Costable, John M. Costable, Glenn Rabin","doi":"10.4103/jpcc.jpcc_3_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n Choking is a leading cause of injury and death among children under the age of five. Despite notable advances in technology, regulations, and education, the prevalence of choking incidents and related fatalities persists as a global issue, demanding the implementation of improved assistance methods. This study aims to assess the efficacy of an innovative airway clearance device, LifeVac, in aiding children aged 5 and under in choking emergencies.\n \n \n \n \n and\n Methods: LifeVac LLC maintained a comprehensive database of voluntary reports documenting the utilization of their device in choking emergencies over 10 years, collected through a dedicated website. Collected data included the age and sex of the choking victim, preexisting medical conditions, nature of the object causing airway obstruction, whether basic life support protocol was followed before employing the LifeVac, number of pulls required to dislodge the obstructing object, and adverse events.\n \n \n \n A total of 299 children were reported to have received assistance with the LifeVac device in choking emergencies. The age range of the assisted children varied from 3 days old to 5 years. One hundred and fifty-seven children were boys. There were 19 reports of preexisting conditions. The most common obstructing objects were plastic, mucus, candy, meat, and fruits. The number of pulls required to successfully dislodge the object ranged from 1 to 10. No failures were reported.\n \n \n \n LifeVac should be considered a valuable complement to standard life support techniques in choking emergencies, particularly for at-risk groups such as children under the age of 5.\n","PeriodicalId":34184,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Critical Care","volume":" 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jpcc.jpcc_3_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Choking is a leading cause of injury and death among children under the age of five. Despite notable advances in technology, regulations, and education, the prevalence of choking incidents and related fatalities persists as a global issue, demanding the implementation of improved assistance methods. This study aims to assess the efficacy of an innovative airway clearance device, LifeVac, in aiding children aged 5 and under in choking emergencies. and Methods: LifeVac LLC maintained a comprehensive database of voluntary reports documenting the utilization of their device in choking emergencies over 10 years, collected through a dedicated website. Collected data included the age and sex of the choking victim, preexisting medical conditions, nature of the object causing airway obstruction, whether basic life support protocol was followed before employing the LifeVac, number of pulls required to dislodge the obstructing object, and adverse events. A total of 299 children were reported to have received assistance with the LifeVac device in choking emergencies. The age range of the assisted children varied from 3 days old to 5 years. One hundred and fifty-seven children were boys. There were 19 reports of preexisting conditions. The most common obstructing objects were plastic, mucus, candy, meat, and fruits. The number of pulls required to successfully dislodge the object ranged from 1 to 10. No failures were reported. LifeVac should be considered a valuable complement to standard life support techniques in choking emergencies, particularly for at-risk groups such as children under the age of 5.
使用新型气道清理装置 LifeVac 救助五岁及以下窒息患者:一项为期 10 年的回顾性观察研究结果
窒息是五岁以下儿童受伤和死亡的主要原因。尽管在技术、法规和教育方面取得了显著进步,但窒息事件的发生率和相关的死亡人数仍然是一个全球性问题,这就要求采用更好的援助方法。本研究旨在评估创新型气道清理设备 LifeVac 在帮助 5 岁及以下儿童应对窒息紧急情况方面的功效。 方法:LifeVac LLC 维护着一个全面的数据库,该数据库通过一个专门的网站收集了 10 年来在窒息紧急情况下使用其设备的自愿报告。收集的数据包括窒息受害者的年龄和性别、已有的医疗状况、导致气道阻塞的物体的性质、使用 LifeVac 之前是否遵循了基本生命支持规程、移除阻塞物体所需的拉力次数以及不良事件。 据报告,共有 299 名儿童在窒息紧急情况下接受了 LifeVac 设备的帮助。接受帮助的儿童年龄从 3 天大到 5 岁不等。其中 157 名儿童为男孩。有 19 份报告称儿童在窒息前已患有疾病。最常见的阻塞物是塑料、粘液、糖果、肉类和水果。成功拉出物体的次数从 1 次到 10 次不等。没有失败的报告。 在窒息紧急情况下,尤其是对于 5 岁以下儿童等高危人群,LifeVac 应被视为标准生命支持技术的重要补充。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信