Why Do Investors Rely on Low-Quality Investment Advice? Experimental Evidence from Social Media Platforms

IF 0.7 Q4 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Kathryn Kadous, Molly Mercer, Yuepin (Daniel) Zhou
{"title":"Why Do Investors Rely on Low-Quality Investment Advice? Experimental Evidence from Social Media Platforms","authors":"Kathryn Kadous, Molly Mercer, Yuepin (Daniel) Zhou","doi":"10.2308/bria-2023-015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n We report the results of a series of experiments showing that individual investors rely on low-quality investment advice from social media platforms, especially when the advice is negative. Our results also suggest reasons for investors’ reliance. Some investors believe that they should rely on the advice, suggesting that reliance on low-quality advice is sometimes due to a lack of knowledge about the advice’s predictive value. However, low-quality advice influences investment judgments even among investors who believe they should not and did not rely on the advice. This unintentional reliance on low-quality advice stems from a tendency to automatically accept information when it is initially provided. Prompting investors to consider the credibility of their information sources before they view low-quality advice reduces the advice’s influence. Our findings suggest that regulators interested in reducing investors’ reliance on low-quality advice should augment knowledge-oriented education with process-oriented interventions.\n Data Availability: Contact the authors.\n JEL Classifications: D83; D91; G41; M41.","PeriodicalId":46356,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Research in Accounting","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral Research in Accounting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2308/bria-2023-015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We report the results of a series of experiments showing that individual investors rely on low-quality investment advice from social media platforms, especially when the advice is negative. Our results also suggest reasons for investors’ reliance. Some investors believe that they should rely on the advice, suggesting that reliance on low-quality advice is sometimes due to a lack of knowledge about the advice’s predictive value. However, low-quality advice influences investment judgments even among investors who believe they should not and did not rely on the advice. This unintentional reliance on low-quality advice stems from a tendency to automatically accept information when it is initially provided. Prompting investors to consider the credibility of their information sources before they view low-quality advice reduces the advice’s influence. Our findings suggest that regulators interested in reducing investors’ reliance on low-quality advice should augment knowledge-oriented education with process-oriented interventions. Data Availability: Contact the authors. JEL Classifications: D83; D91; G41; M41.
投资者为何依赖低质量的投资建议?来自社交媒体平台的实验证据
我们报告的一系列实验结果表明,个人投资者依赖社交媒体平台提供的低质量投资建议,尤其是当这些建议是负面的时候。我们的结果还提出了投资者依赖的原因。一些投资者认为他们应该依赖这些建议,这表明对低质量建议的依赖有时是由于对建议的预测价值缺乏了解。然而,即使是那些认为自己不应该也没有依赖建议的投资者,低质量建议也会影响他们的投资判断。这种对低质量建议的无意依赖源于一种倾向,即在最初获得信息时自动接受信息。促使投资者在查看低质量建议之前考虑其信息来源的可信度,可以降低建议的影响力。我们的研究结果表明,有意减少投资者对低质量建议的依赖的监管者应通过过程导向的干预措施来加强以知识为导向的教育。数据提供:联系作者。JEL Classifications:D83;D91;G41;M41。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
11
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信