The Challenges of Aortic Valve Management After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation

{"title":"The Challenges of Aortic Valve Management After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.atssr.2024.04.028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Continuous retrograde flow across the aortic valve from left ventricular assist device (LVAD) therapy can result in cusp damage and progressive aortic regurgitation, potentially triggering recurrent heart and multiorgan failure. The management of aortic regurgitation after LVAD implantation has not been well defined.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This study retrospectively reviewed the investigators’ experience with the management of de novo aortic regurgitation requiring intervention in patients with continuous-flow LVAD.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Six patients who had undergone LVAD implantation and who required intervention were identified. Two patients underwent redo sternotomy with bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement, and 4 patients underwent percutaneous management, including Amplatzer device (Abbott) placement and transcatheter aortic valve replacement. All patients had resolution of aortic regurgitation with improved hemodynamics and relief from heart failure. One early and 2 late deaths occurred. Valve function was intact, with all valves opening intermittently without greater than trivial aortic regurgitation.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Multiple treatment modalities exist for LVAD-induced aortic valve regurgitation, including open surgical and percutaneous strategies. With a tailored risk-adjusted approach, acceptable results may be achieved.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72234,"journal":{"name":"Annals of thoracic surgery short reports","volume":"2 3","pages":"Pages 567-572"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772993124002122/pdfft?md5=e2810d1a9a0d92ebaa0498061c6dbced&pid=1-s2.0-S2772993124002122-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of thoracic surgery short reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772993124002122","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Continuous retrograde flow across the aortic valve from left ventricular assist device (LVAD) therapy can result in cusp damage and progressive aortic regurgitation, potentially triggering recurrent heart and multiorgan failure. The management of aortic regurgitation after LVAD implantation has not been well defined.

Methods

This study retrospectively reviewed the investigators’ experience with the management of de novo aortic regurgitation requiring intervention in patients with continuous-flow LVAD.

Results

Six patients who had undergone LVAD implantation and who required intervention were identified. Two patients underwent redo sternotomy with bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement, and 4 patients underwent percutaneous management, including Amplatzer device (Abbott) placement and transcatheter aortic valve replacement. All patients had resolution of aortic regurgitation with improved hemodynamics and relief from heart failure. One early and 2 late deaths occurred. Valve function was intact, with all valves opening intermittently without greater than trivial aortic regurgitation.

Conclusions

Multiple treatment modalities exist for LVAD-induced aortic valve regurgitation, including open surgical and percutaneous strategies. With a tailored risk-adjusted approach, acceptable results may be achieved.

左心室辅助装置植入术后主动脉瓣管理面临的挑战
背景左心室辅助装置(LVAD)治疗产生的持续逆流流经主动脉瓣可导致瓣尖损伤和进行性主动脉瓣反流,可能引发复发性心脏和多器官功能衰竭。本研究回顾性分析了研究者对连续流 LVAD 患者需要介入治疗的新发主动脉瓣反流的处理经验。结果确定了六名接受了 LVAD 植入术并需要介入治疗的患者。两名患者接受了重新胸骨切开术和生物人工主动脉瓣置换术,4名患者接受了经皮治疗,包括Amplatzer装置(雅培)置入术和经导管主动脉瓣置换术。所有患者的主动脉瓣反流都得到了缓解,血液动力学状况有所改善,心力衰竭症状也有所缓解。1例早期死亡和2例晚期死亡。瓣膜功能完好,所有瓣膜均可间歇性开放,主动脉瓣反流不严重。通过量身定制的风险调整方法,可以获得可接受的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
53 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信