The rat telemetry assay and venous catheter access buttons for use in cardiovascular safety pharmacology assessments – Surgical methods, refinements and colony maintenance

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Ed Hale , Diane Storer , Nastarsia Smith , Alan McCarthy , Matt Skinner
{"title":"The rat telemetry assay and venous catheter access buttons for use in cardiovascular safety pharmacology assessments – Surgical methods, refinements and colony maintenance","authors":"Ed Hale ,&nbsp;Diane Storer ,&nbsp;Nastarsia Smith ,&nbsp;Alan McCarthy ,&nbsp;Matt Skinner","doi":"10.1016/j.vascn.2024.107517","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Rat telemetry is the assay of choice to assess the potential effects of novel drug candidates on cardiovascular parameters during early drug discovery. Telemetry device implantation can be combined with venous catheter and access button implantation when intravenous administration of the drug substance is required.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Rats (Sprague Dawley or Han Wistar) were implanted with telemetry devices for arterial blood pressure measurement using either direct aortic catheterisation (<em>n</em> = 131) or aortic catheterisation via the femoral artery (<em>n</em> = 17). Bipolar leads for ECG recording were also implanted in some of the animals (<em>n</em> = 102). Femoral vein catheters and access buttons were implanted as a separate surgery after the initial telemetry implantation (<em>n</em> = 43).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>128 animals (86%) were implanted successfully with telemetry devices without any notable surgical or post-surgical problems. When considering the 2 different catheterisation methods separately, the success rate of the direct aortic approach was 88% compared to 76% with the aortic placement via the femoral artery. Lameness was the most common post-surgical problem. Blood loss during surgery and ischaemic patches on the tail were also observed at a low incidence with the direct aortic approach. Catheter pull-out occurred in some rats before the first signal check reducing the overall success rate for blood pressure measurement using the direct aortic approach to 85%. A 95% success rate was observed for catheter and access button implantation.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>A high success rate is possible when implanting telemetry devices in rats with and without venous catheters and access buttons. We have attempted to provide solutions to problems and describe refinements to the procedure which may further improve surgical outcomes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":16767,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pharmacological and toxicological methods","volume":"127 ","pages":"Article 107517"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pharmacological and toxicological methods","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1056871924000273","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Rat telemetry is the assay of choice to assess the potential effects of novel drug candidates on cardiovascular parameters during early drug discovery. Telemetry device implantation can be combined with venous catheter and access button implantation when intravenous administration of the drug substance is required.

Methods

Rats (Sprague Dawley or Han Wistar) were implanted with telemetry devices for arterial blood pressure measurement using either direct aortic catheterisation (n = 131) or aortic catheterisation via the femoral artery (n = 17). Bipolar leads for ECG recording were also implanted in some of the animals (n = 102). Femoral vein catheters and access buttons were implanted as a separate surgery after the initial telemetry implantation (n = 43).

Results

128 animals (86%) were implanted successfully with telemetry devices without any notable surgical or post-surgical problems. When considering the 2 different catheterisation methods separately, the success rate of the direct aortic approach was 88% compared to 76% with the aortic placement via the femoral artery. Lameness was the most common post-surgical problem. Blood loss during surgery and ischaemic patches on the tail were also observed at a low incidence with the direct aortic approach. Catheter pull-out occurred in some rats before the first signal check reducing the overall success rate for blood pressure measurement using the direct aortic approach to 85%. A 95% success rate was observed for catheter and access button implantation.

Discussion

A high success rate is possible when implanting telemetry devices in rats with and without venous catheters and access buttons. We have attempted to provide solutions to problems and describe refinements to the procedure which may further improve surgical outcomes.

用于心血管安全药理学评估的大鼠遥测测定和静脉导管接入按钮 - 手术方法、改进和菌落维护
导言大鼠遥测是早期药物发现过程中评估候选新药对心血管参数潜在影响的首选方法。方法为大鼠(Sprague Dawley 或 Han Wistar)植入遥测装置,使用直接主动脉导管(n = 131)或经股动脉的主动脉导管(n = 17)测量动脉血压。部分动物还植入了用于记录心电图的双极导联(n = 102)。结果 128 只动物(86%)成功植入了遥测设备,没有出现任何明显的手术或术后问题。如果分别考虑两种不同的导管植入方法,主动脉直接植入的成功率为 88%,而通过股动脉植入的成功率为 76%。跛行是最常见的术后问题。采用直接主动脉置入法时,手术中失血和尾部缺血性斑块的发生率也很低。一些大鼠在第一次信号检查前发生导管拔出,导致使用直接主动脉方法测量血压的总体成功率降至 85%。讨论 在大鼠体内植入遥测装置时,无论是否带有静脉导管和接入按钮,都有可能获得较高的成功率。我们试图提供问题的解决方案,并介绍了可进一步提高手术效果的改进方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of pharmacological and toxicological methods
Journal of pharmacological and toxicological methods PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-TOXICOLOGY
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
10.50%
发文量
56
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Pharmacological and Toxicological Methods publishes original articles on current methods of investigation used in pharmacology and toxicology. Pharmacology and toxicology are defined in the broadest sense, referring to actions of drugs and chemicals on all living systems. With its international editorial board and noted contributors, Journal of Pharmacological and Toxicological Methods is the leading journal devoted exclusively to experimental procedures used by pharmacologists and toxicologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信