Current issues of labour dispute resolution through mediation

S.L. Otovchyts
{"title":"Current issues of labour dispute resolution through mediation","authors":"S.L. Otovchyts","doi":"10.24144/2788-6018.2024.02.55","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article presents a comprehensive theoretical and legal study of mediation as an alternative procedure for resolving labor disputes. The author proves that the urgent issue of labor law science is to make specific proposals for the development of a systematic and consistent legislative framework for the use of labor mediation in resolving labor disputes. The author draws attention to the fact that current legislation makes situational references to this concept in certain articles without disclosing its content, which leads to law enforcement problems. Thus, the Law of Ukraine \"On Mediation” supplemented the current Labor Code of Ukraine with a new Article 221-1 \"Settlement of Labor Disputes through Mediation”. It is emphasized that the inclusion of the new provision in Chapter XV \"Individual Labor Disputes” of the Labor Code of Ukraine indicates that the legislator has limited the mediation procedure to the settlement of individual labor disputes. The author emphasizes that failure to comply with the principle of legal certainty as a component of the rule of law principle enshrined in Article 8 of the Constitution of Ukraine impedes the proper protection of labor rights. The author argues that the national legislator incorrectly applies the concept of \"labor dispute” by defining mediation as an alternative way of its resolution, since in fact a \"labor dispute” arises at the time of applying to the bodies which consider them. Mediation does not resolve a labor dispute, but rather disagreements between the parties to labor relations at the stage of voluntary settlement of such disagreements, which is more appropriately called a \"labor conflict”. The author denies the legislator's position that the mediation procedure is applicable only to individual labor disputes. Attention is drawn to the need to extend such an institution to collective labor disputes. The author argues that it is necessary to eliminate regulatory uncertainty regarding the terminology of the concept of \"mediation\" and to harmonize the provisions of the Law of Ukraine \"On Mediation\" and current labor legislation. The existence of stable and clear legislation on mediation is an embodiment of the rule of law and will contribute to the formation of public confidence in alternative out-of-court dispute resolution procedures.","PeriodicalId":227965,"journal":{"name":"Analytical and Comparative Jurisprudence","volume":" 21","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analytical and Comparative Jurisprudence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24144/2788-6018.2024.02.55","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article presents a comprehensive theoretical and legal study of mediation as an alternative procedure for resolving labor disputes. The author proves that the urgent issue of labor law science is to make specific proposals for the development of a systematic and consistent legislative framework for the use of labor mediation in resolving labor disputes. The author draws attention to the fact that current legislation makes situational references to this concept in certain articles without disclosing its content, which leads to law enforcement problems. Thus, the Law of Ukraine "On Mediation” supplemented the current Labor Code of Ukraine with a new Article 221-1 "Settlement of Labor Disputes through Mediation”. It is emphasized that the inclusion of the new provision in Chapter XV "Individual Labor Disputes” of the Labor Code of Ukraine indicates that the legislator has limited the mediation procedure to the settlement of individual labor disputes. The author emphasizes that failure to comply with the principle of legal certainty as a component of the rule of law principle enshrined in Article 8 of the Constitution of Ukraine impedes the proper protection of labor rights. The author argues that the national legislator incorrectly applies the concept of "labor dispute” by defining mediation as an alternative way of its resolution, since in fact a "labor dispute” arises at the time of applying to the bodies which consider them. Mediation does not resolve a labor dispute, but rather disagreements between the parties to labor relations at the stage of voluntary settlement of such disagreements, which is more appropriately called a "labor conflict”. The author denies the legislator's position that the mediation procedure is applicable only to individual labor disputes. Attention is drawn to the need to extend such an institution to collective labor disputes. The author argues that it is necessary to eliminate regulatory uncertainty regarding the terminology of the concept of "mediation" and to harmonize the provisions of the Law of Ukraine "On Mediation" and current labor legislation. The existence of stable and clear legislation on mediation is an embodiment of the rule of law and will contribute to the formation of public confidence in alternative out-of-court dispute resolution procedures.
当前通过调解解决劳动争议的问题
文章对作为解决劳动争议替代程序的调解进行了全面的理论和法律研究。作者认为,劳动法科学的当务之急是提出具体建议,为使用劳动调解解决劳动争议制定系统、一致的立法框架。作者提请注意,现行立法在某些条款中对这一概念进行了情景化引用,但未披露其内容,这导致了执法问题。因此,《乌克兰调解法》对现行《乌克兰劳动法》进行了补充,新增了第 221-1 条 "通过调解解决劳动争议"。需要强调的是,在《乌克兰劳动法典》第十五章 "个人劳动争议 "中加入新条款表明,立法者已将调解程序限定为解决个人劳动争议。提交人强调,不遵守作为《乌克兰宪法》第 8 条所载法治原则组成部分的法律确定性原则阻碍了对劳动权利的适当保护。提交人认为,国家立法者错误地应用了 "劳动争议 "的概念,将调解定义为解决争议的替代方式,因为事实上 "劳动争议 "是在向审议机构提出申请时产生的。调解解决的不是劳动争议,而是劳动关系双方在自愿解决分歧阶段的分歧,称之为 "劳动冲突 "更为恰当。作者否认了立法者关于调解程序仅适用于个别劳动争议的立场。作者指出,有必要将这一制度扩展至集体劳动争议。作者认为,有必要消除有关 "调解 "概念术语的法规不确定性,并协调《乌克兰调解法》和现行劳动立法的规定。稳定和明确的调解立法是法治的体现,将有助于形成公众对庭外争议替代解决程序的信心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信