RHD Genotyping to Resolve Weak and Discrepant RHD Phenotypes: The “Serenissima” Experience

Luca Collodel, Gianluca Gessoni
{"title":"RHD Genotyping to Resolve Weak and Discrepant RHD Phenotypes: The “Serenissima” Experience","authors":"Luca Collodel, Gianluca Gessoni","doi":"10.9734/ibrr/2024/v15i2337","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: A considerable number of RHD alleles responsible for weak and partial D phenotypes have been identified. Serological determination of these phenotypes is often doubtful and makes genetic analysis of RHD gene highly desirable in transfusion recipients and pregnant women. \nAim: We report the experience of Mestre Blood Bank in analysis of the RHD gene in six years from 2018 to 2023. \nMethods: Subjects for RHD gene analysis were selected for presence of a serological weak D phenotype, defined as reactivity of RBCs with an anti-D reagent giving no or weak (≤2+) score in initial testing but agglutinating moderately or strongly with anti human globulin (AHG). These samples were selected for genotyping using the microarray-based method Bead-Chip supplied by Werfen. \nResults: From 2018 to 2023, we selected, for RHD gene analysis, 555  subject with D weak phenotype; 86 subjects (15.5%) were D positive and 56 (10.1%) were D negative, without variant, in 413 subjects a D weak or a D variant was observed. \nDiscussion: Many serological weak D phenotypes are associated to RHD gene mutations leading to one or more amino acids substitutions in the RhD protein predicted to be within or below the RBC membrane, causing decreased antigen expression on the red cell surface. Prevalence of serological weak D phenotypes varies by race and ethnicity. Serological weak D phenotypes are the most common D variants detected in Caucasians (0.2%-1.0%). The majority, as in our series, are associated with weak D type 1, 2 or 3. Our data confirmed a high prevalence of weak D type 1 and type 2, but we observed a high prevalence of type 11 and 15 and of the uncommon type 18 too. The most common partial D phenotypes in Europe are DNB, DVI, and DVII. Our data confirmed a high prevalence of D partial type VI. Studies indicate that D partial transfusion recipients  are at risk of  forming alloanti-D when exposed to conventional RhD-positive blood units.","PeriodicalId":249518,"journal":{"name":"International Blood Research & Reviews","volume":" 19","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Blood Research & Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9734/ibrr/2024/v15i2337","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A considerable number of RHD alleles responsible for weak and partial D phenotypes have been identified. Serological determination of these phenotypes is often doubtful and makes genetic analysis of RHD gene highly desirable in transfusion recipients and pregnant women. Aim: We report the experience of Mestre Blood Bank in analysis of the RHD gene in six years from 2018 to 2023. Methods: Subjects for RHD gene analysis were selected for presence of a serological weak D phenotype, defined as reactivity of RBCs with an anti-D reagent giving no or weak (≤2+) score in initial testing but agglutinating moderately or strongly with anti human globulin (AHG). These samples were selected for genotyping using the microarray-based method Bead-Chip supplied by Werfen. Results: From 2018 to 2023, we selected, for RHD gene analysis, 555  subject with D weak phenotype; 86 subjects (15.5%) were D positive and 56 (10.1%) were D negative, without variant, in 413 subjects a D weak or a D variant was observed. Discussion: Many serological weak D phenotypes are associated to RHD gene mutations leading to one or more amino acids substitutions in the RhD protein predicted to be within or below the RBC membrane, causing decreased antigen expression on the red cell surface. Prevalence of serological weak D phenotypes varies by race and ethnicity. Serological weak D phenotypes are the most common D variants detected in Caucasians (0.2%-1.0%). The majority, as in our series, are associated with weak D type 1, 2 or 3. Our data confirmed a high prevalence of weak D type 1 and type 2, but we observed a high prevalence of type 11 and 15 and of the uncommon type 18 too. The most common partial D phenotypes in Europe are DNB, DVI, and DVII. Our data confirmed a high prevalence of D partial type VI. Studies indicate that D partial transfusion recipients  are at risk of  forming alloanti-D when exposed to conventional RhD-positive blood units.
通过 RHD 基因分型解决 RHD 表型弱化和不明确的问题:Serenissima "的经验
背景:目前已发现相当多的 RHD 等位基因可导致弱 D 表型和部分 D 表型。对这些表型的血清学测定往往是可疑的,因此对输血受者和孕妇进行 RHD 基因分析是非常必要的。目的:我们报告了 Mestre 血库在 2018 年至 2023 年六年间分析 RHD 基因的经验。方法:RHD基因分析的受试者是根据血清学弱D表型的存在情况选择的,弱D表型的定义是红细胞与抗D试剂的反应性在初始测试中没有得分或得分较弱(≤2+),但与抗人球蛋白(AHG)有中度或强烈的凝集。这些样本被选中使用由 Werfen 公司提供的基于芯片的 Bead-Chip 方法进行基因分型。结果:从2018年到2023年,我们选择了555名D弱表型的受试者进行RHD基因分析;86名受试者(15.5%)为D阳性,56名受试者(10.1%)为D阴性,无变异,在413名受试者中观察到D弱或D变异。讨论:许多血清学弱D表型与RHD基因突变有关,突变导致RhD蛋白中的一个或多个氨基酸发生置换,从而导致红细胞膜内或膜下的抗原在红细胞表面的表达减少。血清学弱 D 表型的患病率因种族和人种而异。血清学弱 D 表型是白种人中最常见的 D 变异型(0.2%-1.0%)。在我们的研究中,大多数人都与弱 D 1、2 或 3 型有关。我们的数据证实弱 D 1 型和 2 型的发病率很高,但我们也观察到 11 型和 15 型以及不常见的 18 型的发病率也很高。欧洲最常见的部分 D 表型是 DNB、DVI 和 DVII。我们的数据证实,D 部分型 VI 的发病率很高。研究表明,D 偏型输血者在接触常规 RhD 阳性血液单位时,有形成异体抗 D 的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信