Is Competency-Based Medical Education being implemented as intended? Early lessons learned from Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Jessica Trier, Sussan Askari, Tessa Hanmore, Heather-Ann Thompson, Natalie Wagner, H. Braund, A. Hall, Laura McEwen, N. Dalgarno, J. D. Dagnone
{"title":"Is Competency-Based Medical Education being implemented as intended? Early lessons learned from Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation","authors":"Jessica Trier, Sussan Askari, Tessa Hanmore, Heather-Ann Thompson, Natalie Wagner, H. Braund, A. Hall, Laura McEwen, N. Dalgarno, J. D. Dagnone","doi":"10.36834/cmej.77188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: As competency-based medical education (CBME) curricula are introduced in residency programs across Canada, systematic evaluation efforts are needed to ensure fidelity of implementation. This study evaluated early outcomes of CBME implementation in one Canadian Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation program that was an early adopter of CBME, with an aim to inform continuous quality improvement initiatives and CBME implementation nationwide.\nMethods: Using Rapid Evaluation methodology, informed by the CBME Core Components Framework, the intended outcomes of CBME were compared to actual outcomes.\nResults: Results suggested that a culture of feedback and coaching already existed in this program prior to CBME implementation, yet faculty felt that CBME added a framework to support feedback. The small program size was valuable in fostering strong relationships and individualized learning. However, participants expressed concerns about CBME fostering a reductionist approach to the development of competence. Challenges existed with direct observation, clear expectations for off-service training experiences, and tracking trainee progress. There was trepidation surrounding national curricular change, yet the institution-wide approach to CBME implementation created shared experiences and a community of practice.\nConclusions: Program evaluation can help understand gaps between planned versus enacted implementation of CBME, and foster adaptations to improve the fidelity of implementation.","PeriodicalId":503234,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Medical Education Journal","volume":" 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Medical Education Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36834/cmej.77188","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: As competency-based medical education (CBME) curricula are introduced in residency programs across Canada, systematic evaluation efforts are needed to ensure fidelity of implementation. This study evaluated early outcomes of CBME implementation in one Canadian Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation program that was an early adopter of CBME, with an aim to inform continuous quality improvement initiatives and CBME implementation nationwide. Methods: Using Rapid Evaluation methodology, informed by the CBME Core Components Framework, the intended outcomes of CBME were compared to actual outcomes. Results: Results suggested that a culture of feedback and coaching already existed in this program prior to CBME implementation, yet faculty felt that CBME added a framework to support feedback. The small program size was valuable in fostering strong relationships and individualized learning. However, participants expressed concerns about CBME fostering a reductionist approach to the development of competence. Challenges existed with direct observation, clear expectations for off-service training experiences, and tracking trainee progress. There was trepidation surrounding national curricular change, yet the institution-wide approach to CBME implementation created shared experiences and a community of practice. Conclusions: Program evaluation can help understand gaps between planned versus enacted implementation of CBME, and foster adaptations to improve the fidelity of implementation.
基于能力的医学教育是否按预期实施?物理医学与康复的早期经验教训
背景:随着能力本位医学教育(CBME)课程被引入加拿大各地的住院医师培训项目,需要进行系统的评估工作,以确保实施的忠实性。本研究评估了加拿大一个物理医学与康复专业的 CBME 早期实施成果,旨在为持续质量改进计划和 CBME 在全国的实施提供参考:方法:在CBME核心要素框架的指导下,采用快速评估方法,将CBME的预期成果与实际成果进行比较:结果表明,在实施 CBME 之前,该项目中已经存在反馈和辅导文化,但教师们认为 CBME 增加了一个支持反馈的框架。小规模的项目对于培养牢固的关系和个性化学习很有价值。然而,学员们对 CBME 在培养能力方面的简化方法表示担忧。在直接观察、对脱产培训经历的明确期望以及跟踪学员进展方面都存在挑战。对全国性的课程改革感到惶恐不安,但全校范围的 CBME 实施方法创造了共享经验和实践社区:项目评估有助于了解 CBME 计划实施与实际实施之间的差距,并促进调整以提高实施的忠实度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信