Replacement of tubular fluorescent lamps with tubular LEDs lamps and daylight integration in classrooms and laboratories

Q4 Engineering
{"title":"Replacement of tubular fluorescent lamps with tubular LEDs lamps and daylight integration in classrooms and laboratories","authors":"","doi":"10.59018/032452","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The quality of lighting significantly influences our ability to perform tasks in enclosed spaces, and certain\ncharacteristics of lighting sources play a crucial role. Light-emitting diode (tubular LED) lamps offer advantages for both\nhome and office use. Choosing tubular LED lamps over fluorescent ones is beneficial for several reasons. Tubular LEDs\nare mercury-free, ensuring environmental safety compared to the small amount of mercury present in fluorescent tubes.\nFurthermore, tubular LEDs provide directional lighting, minimizing light loss in fixtures and unnecessary areas, and\noffering better efficiency (around 40% more than tubular fluorescent lamps). Also, they produce high-quality light with\nvarious color temperatures, eliminating flickering issues that can cause discomfort such as eye strain, headaches, and\nmigraines. Additionally, tubular LEDs have a longer lifespan making them a preferable lighting option. The superior\nquality of natural light makes it the optimal source of illumination, which matching well with the visual response of the\nhuman eyes. Daylight has a positive influence on people, instilling a feeling of vibrancy and brightness within their living\nenvironment. The acknowledged benefits of daylight extend to enhancing visual comfort, promoting health, and improving\noverall performance among building occupants. This paper focuses on the integration of natural daylight with artificial\nlight, particularly through tubular LED lamps, and investigates the daylight factor. Two groups of six tubular LED lamps\n(60cm with 9 Watt and 120cm with 18 Watt) and another group of six tubular fluorescent lamps (60cm with 18 Watt and\n120cm with 36 Watt) were studied. The study involved two sets of six tubular LED lamps (60cm with 9W and 120cm with\n18W) and another set with six tubular fluorescent lamps (60cm with 18W and 120cm with 36W). Measurements were\nconducted using Spectroradiometer Ocean Optics HR 2000 with 4.7% uncertainty and a photometric bench to assess the\nspectral output. Additionally, UVA/B silicon detector and Luxmeter detector setups with uncertainties of 5.2% and 6%,\nrespectively, were employed for irradiance and illuminance measurements of tubular LEDs and fluorescent lamps. Various\nparameters, including daylight factor ratio, UVA power to luminous flux (K) for tubular fluorescent lamps, spectral power\ndistribution, and illumination levels were obtained. Integration between daylight and tubular LED lamps was also\ndetermined. The maximum detected value lmW /013.0\n is less than the safe limit for human health but still there are effects\non human health if they use these types of lamps. Therefore, it is advisable to switch from tubular fluorescent lamps to\ntubular LEDs to mitigate the impact of UVA on human health and the environment.","PeriodicalId":38652,"journal":{"name":"ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59018/032452","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The quality of lighting significantly influences our ability to perform tasks in enclosed spaces, and certain characteristics of lighting sources play a crucial role. Light-emitting diode (tubular LED) lamps offer advantages for both home and office use. Choosing tubular LED lamps over fluorescent ones is beneficial for several reasons. Tubular LEDs are mercury-free, ensuring environmental safety compared to the small amount of mercury present in fluorescent tubes. Furthermore, tubular LEDs provide directional lighting, minimizing light loss in fixtures and unnecessary areas, and offering better efficiency (around 40% more than tubular fluorescent lamps). Also, they produce high-quality light with various color temperatures, eliminating flickering issues that can cause discomfort such as eye strain, headaches, and migraines. Additionally, tubular LEDs have a longer lifespan making them a preferable lighting option. The superior quality of natural light makes it the optimal source of illumination, which matching well with the visual response of the human eyes. Daylight has a positive influence on people, instilling a feeling of vibrancy and brightness within their living environment. The acknowledged benefits of daylight extend to enhancing visual comfort, promoting health, and improving overall performance among building occupants. This paper focuses on the integration of natural daylight with artificial light, particularly through tubular LED lamps, and investigates the daylight factor. Two groups of six tubular LED lamps (60cm with 9 Watt and 120cm with 18 Watt) and another group of six tubular fluorescent lamps (60cm with 18 Watt and 120cm with 36 Watt) were studied. The study involved two sets of six tubular LED lamps (60cm with 9W and 120cm with 18W) and another set with six tubular fluorescent lamps (60cm with 18W and 120cm with 36W). Measurements were conducted using Spectroradiometer Ocean Optics HR 2000 with 4.7% uncertainty and a photometric bench to assess the spectral output. Additionally, UVA/B silicon detector and Luxmeter detector setups with uncertainties of 5.2% and 6%, respectively, were employed for irradiance and illuminance measurements of tubular LEDs and fluorescent lamps. Various parameters, including daylight factor ratio, UVA power to luminous flux (K) for tubular fluorescent lamps, spectral power distribution, and illumination levels were obtained. Integration between daylight and tubular LED lamps was also determined. The maximum detected value lmW /013.0  is less than the safe limit for human health but still there are effects on human health if they use these types of lamps. Therefore, it is advisable to switch from tubular fluorescent lamps to tubular LEDs to mitigate the impact of UVA on human health and the environment.
用管状 LED 灯取代管状荧光灯,在教室和实验室实现日光一体化
照明质量在很大程度上影响着我们在封闭空间执行任务的能力,而照明光源的某些特性则起着至关重要的作用。发光二极管(管状 LED)灯在家庭和办公室使用中都具有优势。选择管状 LED 灯而不是荧光灯有几个原因。与荧光灯管中的少量汞相比,管状 LED 不含汞,确保了环境安全。此外,管状 LED 还能提供定向照明,最大限度地减少灯具和不必要区域的光损失,并提供更高的效率(比管状荧光灯高出约 40%)。此外,它们还能产生各种色温的高质量光线,消除了可能导致眼睛疲劳、头痛和偏头痛等不适的闪烁问题。此外,管状 LED 的使用寿命更长,是一种更理想的照明选择。自然光质量上乘,是最佳的照明光源,与人眼的视觉反应十分吻合。日光对人有积极的影响,使人感到生活环境充满活力和光明。日光的好处已得到公认,包括提高视觉舒适度、促进健康和改善建筑使用者的整体表现。本文的重点是将自然日光与人工照明(尤其是通过管状 LED 灯)相结合,并研究日光因素。研究对象包括两组六个管状 LED 灯(60 厘米,9 瓦特;120 厘米,18 瓦特)和另一组六个管状荧光灯(60 厘米,18 瓦特;120 厘米,36 瓦特)。研究涉及两组六个管状 LED 灯(60 厘米,9 瓦;120 厘米,18 瓦)和另一组六个管状荧光灯(60 厘米,18 瓦;120 厘米,36 瓦)。测量使用光谱辐射计 Ocean Optics HR 2000(不确定度为 4.7%)和光度测量台来评估光谱输出。此外,还使用了 UVA/B 硅探测器和 Luxmeter 探测器(不确定度分别为 5.2% 和 6%)来测量管状 LED 和荧光灯的辐照度和照度。获得了各种参数,包括日光系数比、管状荧光灯的 UVA 功率与光通量 (K)、光谱功率分布和照度水平。此外,还确定了日光和管状 LED 灯之间的积分。检测到的最大值 lmW /013.0 小于人体健康的安全限值,但如果使用这类灯具,仍会对人体健康产生影响。因此,建议将管状荧光灯换成管状 LED 灯,以减轻 UVA 对人类健康和环境的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences
ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences Engineering-Engineering (all)
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
期刊介绍: ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences (ISSN 1819-6608) is an online peer-reviewed International research journal aiming at promoting and publishing original high quality research in all disciplines of engineering sciences and technology. All research articles submitted to ARPN-JEAS should be original in nature, never previously published in any journal or presented in a conference or undergoing such process across the globe. All the submissions will be peer-reviewed by the panel of experts associated with particular field. Submitted papers should meet the internationally accepted criteria and manuscripts should follow the style of the journal for the purpose of both reviewing and editing. Our mission is -In cooperation with our business partners, lower the world-wide cost of research publishing operations. -Provide an infrastructure that enriches the capacity for research facilitation and communication, among researchers, college and university teachers, students and other related stakeholders. -Reshape the means for dissemination and management of information and knowledge in ways that enhance opportunities for research and learning and improve access to scholarly resources. -Expand access to research publishing to the public. -Ensure high-quality, effective and efficient production and support good research and development activities that meet or exceed the expectations of research community. Scope of Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences: -Engineering Mechanics -Construction Materials -Surveying -Fluid Mechanics & Hydraulics -Modeling & Simulations -Thermodynamics -Manufacturing Technologies -Refrigeration & Air-conditioning -Metallurgy -Automatic Control Systems -Electronic Communication Systems -Agricultural Machinery & Equipment -Mining & Minerals -Mechatronics -Applied Sciences -Public Health Engineering -Chemical Engineering -Hydrology -Tube Wells & Pumps -Structures
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信