MODIFIKASI DINDING BUBU LIPAT UNTUK MELOLOSKAN RAJUNGAN YANG BELUM LAYAK TANGKAP

Adi Susanto, Hery Sutrawan Nurdin, Jayanudin, Ririn Irnawati, Asep Hamzah, Fahresa Nugraheni Supadminingsih, Hendrawan Syafrie, Lana Izzul Azkia, Mumung Sucilawati, Divandra Yogi Adisaputra, Alfito Dicky Hikmatyar
{"title":"MODIFIKASI DINDING BUBU LIPAT UNTUK MELOLOSKAN RAJUNGAN YANG BELUM LAYAK TANGKAP","authors":"Adi Susanto, Hery Sutrawan Nurdin, Jayanudin, Ririn Irnawati, Asep Hamzah, Fahresa Nugraheni Supadminingsih, Hendrawan Syafrie, Lana Izzul Azkia, Mumung Sucilawati, Divandra Yogi Adisaputra, Alfito Dicky Hikmatyar","doi":"10.29244/jmf.v15i1.49776","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Increasing of fishing pressure poses a serious threat to the sustainability of blue swimminng crab resources. Trap design modifications are needed to improve size selectivity and to release under size crabs. This study aimed to determine the type of wall modification of collapsible trap that is effective in excluding under size blue swimming crab. Laboratory observations were conducted using four escape vents treatments and three different mesh sizes. The escape gap used are rectangular, square, circular and oval respectively. Moreover, the mesh sizes used are 2.0 inches, 2.5 inches and 3.0 inches. Descriptive analysis and scoring were used to determine the most effective type of wall trap modification to be used in the blue swimming crab fishing. The results showed that the rectangular escape gap has better effectiveness than other shapes with the percentage of crabs that pass through at 86.7%. The wall modification using a 3.0-inch mesh size had better performance than the other modification types with a total score of 19. Collapsible trap with a 3.0-inch mesh wall was able to escape 86.7% of the crabs with an escape time of only 11.2 seconds and an average escaped crab carapace width of 78 mm. \nKeywords: Collapsible trap, escape gap, environmentaly-frendly fisheries, mesh size of trap wall","PeriodicalId":515986,"journal":{"name":"Marine Fisheries : Journal of Marine Fisheries Technology and Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Marine Fisheries : Journal of Marine Fisheries Technology and Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29244/jmf.v15i1.49776","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Increasing of fishing pressure poses a serious threat to the sustainability of blue swimminng crab resources. Trap design modifications are needed to improve size selectivity and to release under size crabs. This study aimed to determine the type of wall modification of collapsible trap that is effective in excluding under size blue swimming crab. Laboratory observations were conducted using four escape vents treatments and three different mesh sizes. The escape gap used are rectangular, square, circular and oval respectively. Moreover, the mesh sizes used are 2.0 inches, 2.5 inches and 3.0 inches. Descriptive analysis and scoring were used to determine the most effective type of wall trap modification to be used in the blue swimming crab fishing. The results showed that the rectangular escape gap has better effectiveness than other shapes with the percentage of crabs that pass through at 86.7%. The wall modification using a 3.0-inch mesh size had better performance than the other modification types with a total score of 19. Collapsible trap with a 3.0-inch mesh wall was able to escape 86.7% of the crabs with an escape time of only 11.2 seconds and an average escaped crab carapace width of 78 mm. Keywords: Collapsible trap, escape gap, environmentaly-frendly fisheries, mesh size of trap wall
改造折叠式布布墙以释放不适合捕捞的螃蟹
不断增加的捕捞压力对青蟹资源的可持续性构成了严重威胁。需要对诱捕器的设计进行改进,以提高对规格的选择性,并释放规格不足的青蟹。本研究旨在确定可折叠诱捕器的壁改良类型,以有效排除小规格的青蟹。使用四种逃生口处理方法和三种不同尺寸的网眼进行了实验室观察。使用的逃生缝隙分别为长方形、正方形、圆形和椭圆形。此外,使用的网目尺寸分别为 2.0 英寸、2.5 英寸和 3.0 英寸。通过描述性分析和评分来确定在捕捞蓝色游蟹时最有效的墙式诱捕器改良类型。结果表明,矩形逃生缝隙比其他形状更有效,螃蟹通过的百分比为 86.7%。使用 3.0 英寸网眼的墙式改装效果优于其他改装类型,总得分为 19 分。网壁为 3.0 英寸的可折叠诱捕器能够逃脱 86.7% 的螃蟹,逃脱时间仅为 11.2 秒,平均逃脱的螃蟹胴体宽度为 78 毫米。关键词可折叠诱捕器;逃逸间隙;环境友好型渔业;诱捕器网壁尺寸
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信