Research on Homework in ELT: A Systematic Review

Q3 Multidisciplinary
Duha Nur Doğan
{"title":"Research on Homework in ELT: A Systematic Review","authors":"Duha Nur Doğan","doi":"10.62227/as/74227","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent expenditures in educational technology have changed instructors’ methods. In this environment, instructors may assign and oversee assignments online. Web-based instructional technology has grown rapidly. Parallel to these improvements, academics and educators have become increasingly interested in homework systems to assess language abilities. This research review addresses English language homework studies from five perspectives: general sources of publications; English language homework; conceptual methods; research concerns and findings; and subsequent effects. The systematic study includes 37 SSCI-ASCI journal papers on English language skill-based homework and homework conceptual categories. The data show that there is no consensus on which homework method improves academic performance. However, most believe that online homework boosts student performance and engagement more than conventional homework. Language homework also improved reading, listening, and understanding. The results provide educational and research directions. Educational technology advancements have led to online assignment management and increased interest in language assessment. A research review of 37 SSCI-ASCI journal papers found no consensus on which method improves academic performance. Online homework is believed to boost student performance and engagement more than conventional methods, improving reading, listening, and understanding.","PeriodicalId":55478,"journal":{"name":"Archives Des Sciences","volume":" March","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives Des Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62227/as/74227","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Multidisciplinary","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recent expenditures in educational technology have changed instructors’ methods. In this environment, instructors may assign and oversee assignments online. Web-based instructional technology has grown rapidly. Parallel to these improvements, academics and educators have become increasingly interested in homework systems to assess language abilities. This research review addresses English language homework studies from five perspectives: general sources of publications; English language homework; conceptual methods; research concerns and findings; and subsequent effects. The systematic study includes 37 SSCI-ASCI journal papers on English language skill-based homework and homework conceptual categories. The data show that there is no consensus on which homework method improves academic performance. However, most believe that online homework boosts student performance and engagement more than conventional homework. Language homework also improved reading, listening, and understanding. The results provide educational and research directions. Educational technology advancements have led to online assignment management and increased interest in language assessment. A research review of 37 SSCI-ASCI journal papers found no consensus on which method improves academic performance. Online homework is believed to boost student performance and engagement more than conventional methods, improving reading, listening, and understanding.
英语语言教学中的家庭作业研究:系统回顾
最近在教育技术方面的支出改变了教师的教学方法。在这种环境下,教师可以在网上布置和监督作业。基于网络的教学技术发展迅速。与此同时,学术界和教育工作者对评估语言能力的家庭作业系统也越来越感兴趣。本研究综述从五个方面探讨了英语家庭作业研究:出版物的一般来源;英语家庭作业;概念方法;研究关注点和结果;后续效果。系统研究包括 37 篇关于英语技能型家庭作业和家庭作业概念分类的 SSCI-ASCI 期刊论文。数据显示,对于哪种家庭作业方法能提高学习成绩并没有达成共识。不过,大多数人认为,在线家庭作业比传统家庭作业更能提高学生的学习成绩和参与度。语文家庭作业也提高了阅读、听力和理解能力。这些结果为教育和研究提供了方向。教育技术的进步带来了在线作业管理,也增加了人们对语言评估的兴趣。对 37 篇 SSCI-ASCI 期刊论文的研究综述发现,对于哪种方法能提高学习成绩,并没有达成共识。在线作业被认为比传统方法更能提高学生的成绩和参与度,改善阅读、听力和理解能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Archives Des Sciences
Archives Des Sciences 综合性期刊-综合性期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Archives des Sciences est un journal scientifique multidisciplinaire et international. Les articles sont soumis à un comité de lecture.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信