Exploring the multidimensional challenges in integrating Design for Safety (DfS) in the Ghanaian construction industry

Alex Acheampong, Elvis Konadu Adjei, A. Adade-Boateng, Ernest Kissi, Patrick Manu, David Wireko Atibila
{"title":"Exploring the multidimensional challenges in integrating Design for Safety (DfS) in the Ghanaian construction industry","authors":"Alex Acheampong, Elvis Konadu Adjei, A. Adade-Boateng, Ernest Kissi, Patrick Manu, David Wireko Atibila","doi":"10.1108/jedt-11-2023-0481","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe uptake of Design for Safety (DfS) practices in developing countries like Ghana has been limited. This study aims to provide an in-depth understanding of the barriers across regulatory, organizational, cultural and educational dimensions that restrict DfS assimilation in the Ghanaian construction sector. Identifying the key impediments can inform policy initiatives and industry efforts to facilitate safer construction.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nA postpositive philosophy underpinned the quantitative research. Multi-stage research was used. A comprehensive questionnaire survey was designed and given to six industry experts to assess clarity, relevance and effectiveness after a thorough literature review. In all, 164 professionals were reached to take part in the study using purposive sampling and consequently snowballing. “Variables” were ranked using mean score ranking and normalization techniques; exploratory factor analysis was then used to group variables into clusters.\n\n\nFindings\nEmergent findings revealed four distinct clusters of challenges; Design Process and Communication Challenges; Regulatory and Expertise Limitations; Planning and Education Constraints; and Attitudinal and Perception Barriers. These findings help identify targeted solutions to overcome barriers including developing robust regulatory frameworks, promoting collaboration among stakeholders and cultivating a positive safety culture.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis study provides new insights into the integration of DfS in the context of the developing construction industry in Ghana. This study expands the knowledge base to drive further research in enhancing construction safety in developing countries. Practical recommendations for overcoming these challenges are proposed.\n","PeriodicalId":514531,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology","volume":"113 29","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jedt-11-2023-0481","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose The uptake of Design for Safety (DfS) practices in developing countries like Ghana has been limited. This study aims to provide an in-depth understanding of the barriers across regulatory, organizational, cultural and educational dimensions that restrict DfS assimilation in the Ghanaian construction sector. Identifying the key impediments can inform policy initiatives and industry efforts to facilitate safer construction. Design/methodology/approach A postpositive philosophy underpinned the quantitative research. Multi-stage research was used. A comprehensive questionnaire survey was designed and given to six industry experts to assess clarity, relevance and effectiveness after a thorough literature review. In all, 164 professionals were reached to take part in the study using purposive sampling and consequently snowballing. “Variables” were ranked using mean score ranking and normalization techniques; exploratory factor analysis was then used to group variables into clusters. Findings Emergent findings revealed four distinct clusters of challenges; Design Process and Communication Challenges; Regulatory and Expertise Limitations; Planning and Education Constraints; and Attitudinal and Perception Barriers. These findings help identify targeted solutions to overcome barriers including developing robust regulatory frameworks, promoting collaboration among stakeholders and cultivating a positive safety culture. Originality/value This study provides new insights into the integration of DfS in the context of the developing construction industry in Ghana. This study expands the knowledge base to drive further research in enhancing construction safety in developing countries. Practical recommendations for overcoming these challenges are proposed.
探讨加纳建筑业在整合安全设计(DfS)方面面临的多层面挑战
目的 加纳等发展中国家对安全设计(DfS)做法的采用一直很有限。本研究旨在深入了解制约加纳建筑行业吸收安全设计的监管、组织、文化和教育方面的障碍。找出关键障碍可以为政策措施和行业努力提供信息,从而促进更安全的建筑。采用了多阶段研究。我们设计了一份综合问卷调查,并在对文献进行全面审查后,向六位行业专家发放了问卷,以评估问卷的清晰度、相关性和有效性。通过有目的的抽样和滚雪球的方式,共有 164 名专业人士参与了研究。使用平均分排序和归一化技术对 "变量 "进行了排序;然后使用探索性因子分析将变量分组。研究结果研究结果显示了四个不同的挑战组:设计流程和沟通挑战;监管和专业知识限制;规划和教育限制;以及态度和认知障碍。这些发现有助于确定克服障碍的有针对性的解决方案,包括制定强有力的监管框架、促进利益相关者之间的合作以及培养积极的安全文化。本研究扩展了知识库,有助于进一步研究如何加强发展中国家的建筑安全。为克服这些挑战提出了切实可行的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信