Nebulization versus injection in ambulatory treatment of acute asthma: a comparative study

Christer Janson, Merja Herala, Ingela Sjögren
{"title":"Nebulization versus injection in ambulatory treatment of acute asthma: a comparative study","authors":"Christer Janson,&nbsp;Merja Herala,&nbsp;Ingela Sjögren","doi":"10.1016/0007-0971(88)90087-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Nebulization treatment of acute asthma with terbutaline and ipratropium bromide, given either separately with a 30-minute interval or combined as single inhalation, was compared with injection treatment with a combination of terbutaline given subcutaneously and theophylline given intravenously.</p><p>Seventy-seven episodes of acute asthma were studied. Nebulization treatment gave the same degree of bronchodilation as the injections, both immediately after treatment [measured as increase in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV<sub>1</sub>) in peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) and improvement of dyspnoea] and during the following 6 days (measured by PEFR recordings at home).</p><p>The injection treatment caused a moderate increase in heart rate, whereas no circulatory side-effects were noted during nebulization treatment.</p><p>Administration of ipratropium bromide 30 minutes after terbutaline was not more effective than the combination of both substances as a single nebulization.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":75618,"journal":{"name":"British journal of diseases of the chest","volume":"82 ","pages":"Pages 347-353"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1988-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0007-0971(88)90087-3","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of diseases of the chest","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0007097188900873","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

Nebulization treatment of acute asthma with terbutaline and ipratropium bromide, given either separately with a 30-minute interval or combined as single inhalation, was compared with injection treatment with a combination of terbutaline given subcutaneously and theophylline given intravenously.

Seventy-seven episodes of acute asthma were studied. Nebulization treatment gave the same degree of bronchodilation as the injections, both immediately after treatment [measured as increase in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) in peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) and improvement of dyspnoea] and during the following 6 days (measured by PEFR recordings at home).

The injection treatment caused a moderate increase in heart rate, whereas no circulatory side-effects were noted during nebulization treatment.

Administration of ipratropium bromide 30 minutes after terbutaline was not more effective than the combination of both substances as a single nebulization.

雾化与注射在急性哮喘门诊治疗中的比较研究
用特布他林和异丙托溴铵雾化治疗急性哮喘,分别间隔30分钟或单次吸入,与特布他林皮下注射和茶碱静脉注射联合治疗进行比较。研究了77例急性哮喘发作。在治疗后立即(以呼气峰流速(PEFR) 1秒用力呼气量(FEV1)增加和呼吸困难改善来测量)和随后的6天(通过家中PEFR记录来测量),雾化治疗的支气管扩张程度与注射治疗相同。注射治疗引起心率适度增加,而雾化治疗期间没有注意到循环副作用。在特布他林后30分钟给予异丙托溴铵并不比两种物质联合作为单一雾化更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信