Consolation Effect of Medical Clown Care Model in Children with Inguinal Hernia During Perioperative Period: A Single-Center Study in China

IF 0.4 4区 医学 Q4 PEDIATRICS
Cui Liu, Tong Hou
{"title":"Consolation Effect of Medical Clown Care Model in Children with Inguinal Hernia During Perioperative Period: A Single-Center Study in China","authors":"Cui Liu, Tong Hou","doi":"10.5812/ijp-144106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Due to differences in medical backgrounds, there have been few studies on medical clown care in Chinese hospitals. Objectives: This study aimed to explore the consolatory effect of the medical clown care model on children in a Chinese hospital. Methods: This study included 236 children aged 4 - 6 years and divided them into an intervention group (n = 116) and a control group (n = 120). The control group received routine nursing measures, while the intervention group experienced the medical clown care model. To assess the children’s pain levels and the anxiety levels of their parents, the Face Legs Activity Cry and Consolability (FLACC) Scale, Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale (W-B FPS-R), and Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) were used. Results: The baseline data for both groups were comparable at admission (P > 0.05). The FLACC score, W-B FPS-R score, and crying rate in the intervention group were significantly lower than those in the control group (4.81 vs 6.71, 4.69 vs 7.02, 44.83 % vs 79.16 %, P < 0.05). Parents in the intervention group also had lower preoperative anxiety scores compared to those in the control group (42.85 vs 52.69, P < 0.05). Furthermore, the postoperative pain incidence and drug use rates were significantly lower in the intervention group (18.97 % vs 30.83 %, 27.27 % vs 56.76 %, P < 0.05). Compliance and satisfaction were significantly higher in the intervention group than in the control group (P < 0.05). Conclusions: The application of the clown care model can effectively reduce children's pain, provide consolation, and relieve parental anxiety.","PeriodicalId":14593,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Journal of Pediatrics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Journal of Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/ijp-144106","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Due to differences in medical backgrounds, there have been few studies on medical clown care in Chinese hospitals. Objectives: This study aimed to explore the consolatory effect of the medical clown care model on children in a Chinese hospital. Methods: This study included 236 children aged 4 - 6 years and divided them into an intervention group (n = 116) and a control group (n = 120). The control group received routine nursing measures, while the intervention group experienced the medical clown care model. To assess the children’s pain levels and the anxiety levels of their parents, the Face Legs Activity Cry and Consolability (FLACC) Scale, Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale (W-B FPS-R), and Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) were used. Results: The baseline data for both groups were comparable at admission (P > 0.05). The FLACC score, W-B FPS-R score, and crying rate in the intervention group were significantly lower than those in the control group (4.81 vs 6.71, 4.69 vs 7.02, 44.83 % vs 79.16 %, P < 0.05). Parents in the intervention group also had lower preoperative anxiety scores compared to those in the control group (42.85 vs 52.69, P < 0.05). Furthermore, the postoperative pain incidence and drug use rates were significantly lower in the intervention group (18.97 % vs 30.83 %, 27.27 % vs 56.76 %, P < 0.05). Compliance and satisfaction were significantly higher in the intervention group than in the control group (P < 0.05). Conclusions: The application of the clown care model can effectively reduce children's pain, provide consolation, and relieve parental anxiety.
医疗小丑护理模式对腹股沟疝气患儿围手术期的安慰效果:中国单中心研究
背景:由于医疗背景的差异,有关中国医院医疗小丑护理的研究很少。研究目的本研究旨在探讨医疗小丑护理模式对中国医院儿童的安慰效果。研究方法:本研究共纳入 236 名 4-6 岁儿童,将其分为干预组(116 人)和对照组(120 人)。对照组接受常规护理措施,干预组则体验医疗小丑护理模式。为了评估患儿的疼痛程度和家长的焦虑程度,采用了面腿活动哭泣和安慰量表(FLACC)、Wong-Baker FACES 疼痛评定量表(W-B FPS-R)和焦虑自评量表(SAS)。结果两组患者入院时的基线数据具有可比性(P > 0.05)。干预组的 FLACC 评分、W-B FPS-R 评分和哭闹率明显低于对照组(4.81 vs 6.71、4.69 vs 7.02、44.83 % vs 79.16 %,P <0.05)。干预组家长的术前焦虑评分也低于对照组(42.85 vs 52.69,P < 0.05)。此外,干预组的术后疼痛发生率和用药率明显低于对照组(18.97 % vs 30.83 %,27.27 % vs 56.76 %,P < 0.05)。干预组的依从性和满意度明显高于对照组(P < 0.05)。结论小丑护理模式的应用可有效减轻患儿的疼痛、提供安慰并缓解家长的焦虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
20.00%
发文量
75
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Iranian Journal of Pediatrics (Iran J Pediatr) is a peer-reviewed medical publication. The purpose of Iran J Pediatr is to increase knowledge, stimulate research in all fields of Pediatrics, and promote better management of pediatric patients. To achieve the goals, the journal publishes basic, biomedical, and clinical investigations on prevalent diseases relevant to pediatrics. The acceptance criteria for all papers are the quality and originality of the research and their significance to our readership. Except where otherwise stated, manuscripts are peer-reviewed by minimum three anonymous reviewers. The Editorial Board reserves the right to refuse any material for publication and advises that authors should retain copies of submitted manuscripts and correspondence as the material cannot be returned. Final acceptance or rejection rests with the Editors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信