My Voice, My Choice: A systematic review of the literature relating to consumer-directed care in Australia

Jennifer Kosiol, R. Olley, Sheree Lloyd, Linda Fraser, Helen Cooper, Daniel Waid
{"title":"My Voice, My Choice: A systematic review of the literature relating to consumer-directed care in Australia","authors":"Jennifer Kosiol, R. Olley, Sheree Lloyd, Linda Fraser, Helen Cooper, Daniel Waid","doi":"10.24083/apjhm.v19i1.3265","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives and importance of study: The objective of this systematic review of the literature was to examine the evidence relating to consumer-directed care (CDC) in the aged care environment. CDC entails providing individuals with the option of choice and flexibility in their care, to empower aged care recipients with autonomous decisions over their healthcare choices. Additionally, the researchers found evidence relating to the vulnerability of users of aged care services and the lack of understanding towards a true consumer-oriented approach which was highlighted during the Royal Commission into Aged Care Safety and Quality.\nStudy type and method: The research team used the PRISMA Method to review the available literature systematically. This qualitative review of the literature on consumer choice in the aged and social care sectors assessed sixteen high-quality research papers and identified themes that emerged to promote authentic consumer voice in aged care services. These articles provided insight into what aged care providers require to increase transparency and facilitate effective, meaningful consumer choice.\nResults: Six themes emerged from the literature reviewed: Informed Choice, See Me Hear Me, Funding My Choices, My Choice My Way, Policy, and Know Me, Include Me. The authors found significant challenges to authentic consumer voice in terms of reliable information, complex, inflexible service provision, and a trusted and skilled carer workforce.\nConclusion: Authentic consumer choice requires collaboratively designed care plans with consumers, integrating their care-related preferences and values. Providers who have embraced CDC principles, and innovative practices have enhanced person-centred care, and consumer experience and autonomy. Cultivating inclusive, transparent, and collaborative environments to empower older Australians to shape and control their care provision and wellbeing is a key challenge for providers.","PeriodicalId":505648,"journal":{"name":"Asia Pacific Journal of Health Management","volume":"117 46","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia Pacific Journal of Health Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24083/apjhm.v19i1.3265","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives and importance of study: The objective of this systematic review of the literature was to examine the evidence relating to consumer-directed care (CDC) in the aged care environment. CDC entails providing individuals with the option of choice and flexibility in their care, to empower aged care recipients with autonomous decisions over their healthcare choices. Additionally, the researchers found evidence relating to the vulnerability of users of aged care services and the lack of understanding towards a true consumer-oriented approach which was highlighted during the Royal Commission into Aged Care Safety and Quality. Study type and method: The research team used the PRISMA Method to review the available literature systematically. This qualitative review of the literature on consumer choice in the aged and social care sectors assessed sixteen high-quality research papers and identified themes that emerged to promote authentic consumer voice in aged care services. These articles provided insight into what aged care providers require to increase transparency and facilitate effective, meaningful consumer choice. Results: Six themes emerged from the literature reviewed: Informed Choice, See Me Hear Me, Funding My Choices, My Choice My Way, Policy, and Know Me, Include Me. The authors found significant challenges to authentic consumer voice in terms of reliable information, complex, inflexible service provision, and a trusted and skilled carer workforce. Conclusion: Authentic consumer choice requires collaboratively designed care plans with consumers, integrating their care-related preferences and values. Providers who have embraced CDC principles, and innovative practices have enhanced person-centred care, and consumer experience and autonomy. Cultivating inclusive, transparent, and collaborative environments to empower older Australians to shape and control their care provision and wellbeing is a key challenge for providers.
我的声音,我的选择:对澳大利亚消费者指导护理相关文献的系统回顾
研究目的和重要性:本系统性文献综述的目的是研究与老年护理环境中的消费者指导型护理(CDC)相关的证据。消费者指导型护理需要为个人提供护理方面的选择和灵活性,使养老护理接受者能够自主决定他们的医疗保健选择。此外,研究人员还发现了与老年护理服务使用者的脆弱性有关的证据,以及对真正以消费者为导向的方法缺乏理解的情况,这一点在皇家老年护理安全与质量委员会会议上得到了强调:研究小组采用 PRISMA 方法对现有文献进行了系统回顾。本研究对有关老年和社会护理行业消费者选择的文献进行了定性审查,评估了 16 篇高质量的研究论文,并确定了在老年护理服务中促进真正的消费者声音的主题。这些文章让我们深入了解了养老服务提供者需要哪些条件来提高透明度,并促进有效、有意义的消费者选择:结果:从查阅的文献中发现了六个主题:知情选择、看我听我、资助我的选择、我的选择我做主、政策以及了解我、包容我。作者发现,在可靠的信息、复杂而不灵活的服务提供以及可信赖且技术熟练的护理人员队伍方面,消费者的真实声音面临着巨大挑战:结论:真正的消费者选择需要与消费者合作设计护理计划,将他们与护理相关的偏好和价值观结合起来。接受疾病预防控制中心原则和创新实践的护理提供者,加强了以人为本的护理、消费者体验和自主性。营造包容、透明和合作的环境,使澳大利亚老年人有能力决定和控制他们的护理服务和福利,是护理服务提供者面临的一项关键挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信