Neutropenic sepsis in the Intensive Care Unit: differences in clinical profile and outcomes according to the cause of neutropenia

Aleece MacPhail, C. Dendle, Monica Slavin, R. Weinkove, Michael Bailey, D. Pilcher, Zoe McQuilten
{"title":"Neutropenic sepsis in the Intensive Care Unit: differences in clinical profile and outcomes according to the cause of neutropenia","authors":"Aleece MacPhail, C. Dendle, Monica Slavin, R. Weinkove, Michael Bailey, D. Pilcher, Zoe McQuilten","doi":"10.1093/ofid/ofae289","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n Neutropenic sepsis frequently requires admission to an Intensive Care Unit (ICU). Differences between subgroups of patients with neutropenic sepsis are not well characterised.\n \n \n \n To investigate clinical outcomes among patients with neutropenic sepsis and haematological malignancy, metastatic solid cancer, or no cancer diagnosis.\n \n \n \n Retrospective cohort study of all patients admitted to ICU in Australia or New Zealand between January 2000 and December 2022 with a primary admission diagnosis of sepsis and total white cell count <1.0 × 109cells/L.\n \n \n \n We identified 8,617 ICU admissions with neutropenic sepsis (Haematological malignancy n = 4,660; metastatic solid cancer n = 1,034; no cancer n = 2,800). Patients with haematological malignancy were younger (median 61.5 years) with low rates of chronic comorbidities (4.7%), and were usually admitted to ICU from the ward (67.4%). Mechanical ventilation rates were 20.2% and in-hospital mortality was 30.6%. Patients with metastatic solid cancers were older (median 66.3 years), with higher rates of chronic comorbidities (9.9%), and were usually admitted to ICU from the emergency department (50.8%). Mechanical ventilation rates were 16.9% and in-hospital mortality was 42.4%. Patients with no documented cancer had highest rates of mechanical ventilation (41.7%) and mortality (46.3%).\n Neutropenia was independently associated with mortality among patients with solid cancers or no cancer, but did not confer increased risk among patients with haematological malignancy (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.90–1.06, p = 0.60).\n \n \n \n Patients with neutropenic sepsis and haematological malignancy, metastatic solid cancer, or no cancer diagnosis constitute three distinct clinical groups. Management approaches should be tailored accordingly.\n","PeriodicalId":510506,"journal":{"name":"Open Forum Infectious Diseases","volume":"125 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Forum Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofae289","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Neutropenic sepsis frequently requires admission to an Intensive Care Unit (ICU). Differences between subgroups of patients with neutropenic sepsis are not well characterised. To investigate clinical outcomes among patients with neutropenic sepsis and haematological malignancy, metastatic solid cancer, or no cancer diagnosis. Retrospective cohort study of all patients admitted to ICU in Australia or New Zealand between January 2000 and December 2022 with a primary admission diagnosis of sepsis and total white cell count <1.0 × 109cells/L. We identified 8,617 ICU admissions with neutropenic sepsis (Haematological malignancy n = 4,660; metastatic solid cancer n = 1,034; no cancer n = 2,800). Patients with haematological malignancy were younger (median 61.5 years) with low rates of chronic comorbidities (4.7%), and were usually admitted to ICU from the ward (67.4%). Mechanical ventilation rates were 20.2% and in-hospital mortality was 30.6%. Patients with metastatic solid cancers were older (median 66.3 years), with higher rates of chronic comorbidities (9.9%), and were usually admitted to ICU from the emergency department (50.8%). Mechanical ventilation rates were 16.9% and in-hospital mortality was 42.4%. Patients with no documented cancer had highest rates of mechanical ventilation (41.7%) and mortality (46.3%). Neutropenia was independently associated with mortality among patients with solid cancers or no cancer, but did not confer increased risk among patients with haematological malignancy (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.90–1.06, p = 0.60). Patients with neutropenic sepsis and haematological malignancy, metastatic solid cancer, or no cancer diagnosis constitute three distinct clinical groups. Management approaches should be tailored accordingly.
重症监护病房中的中性粒细胞败血症:不同中性粒细胞减少原因导致的临床表现和预后差异
中性粒细胞脓毒症患者通常需要入住重症监护病房(ICU)。中性粒细胞减少性败血症患者亚群之间的差异尚未得到很好的描述。 研究嗜中性粒细胞增多性败血症合并血液恶性肿瘤、转移性实体癌或未确诊癌症患者的临床结局。 对2000年1月至2022年12月期间在澳大利亚或新西兰入住重症监护病房、主要入院诊断为败血症且白细胞总数小于1.0 × 109cells/L的所有患者进行回顾性队列研究。 我们确定了8617名入住ICU的中性粒细胞败血症患者(血液恶性肿瘤n=4660;转移性实体癌n=1034;无癌症n=2800)。血液恶性肿瘤患者较年轻(中位数为 61.5 岁),慢性并发症发生率较低(4.7%),通常从病房进入重症监护室(67.4%)。机械通气率为20.2%,院内死亡率为30.6%。转移性实体癌患者年龄较大(中位数为 66.3 岁),慢性并发症发生率较高(9.9%),通常从急诊科进入重症监护室(50.8%)。机械通气率为16.9%,院内死亡率为42.4%。无癌症记录的患者机械通气率(41.7%)和死亡率(46.3%)最高。中性粒细胞减少症与实体癌或无癌症患者的死亡率密切相关,但不会增加血液恶性肿瘤患者的风险(OR 0.98,95% CI 0.90-1.06,p = 0.60)。 中性粒细胞减少性败血症合并血液恶性肿瘤、转移性实体癌或未确诊癌症的患者构成了三个不同的临床群体。管理方法也应相应调整。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信