Make-or-Buy Policy Decision in Maintenance Planning for Mobility: A Multi-Criteria Approach

Logistics Pub Date : 2024-05-20 DOI:10.3390/logistics8020055
Tommaso Ortalli, Andrea Di Martino, Michela Longo, Dario Zaninelli
{"title":"Make-or-Buy Policy Decision in Maintenance Planning for Mobility: A Multi-Criteria Approach","authors":"Tommaso Ortalli, Andrea Di Martino, Michela Longo, Dario Zaninelli","doi":"10.3390/logistics8020055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The ongoing technical innovation is fully involving transportation sector, converting the usual mass-transit system toward a sustainable mobility. Make-or-buy decision are usually adopted to assess different solutions in terms of costs-benefits to put in place strategic choices regarding in-house production or from an external supplier. This can also be reflected on maintenance operations, thus replicating a similar approach to transport companies involved. Method: A decision-making model by means of a multi-criteria analysis can lead make-or-buy choices adapted to maintenance. A brief introduction into the actual mobility context is provided, evaluating global and national trends with respect to the mobility solutions offered. Then, a focus is set on maintenance approaches in mobility sector and the need of a make-or-buy decision process is considered. The decision-making path is developed through a multi-criteria framework based on eigenvector weighing assessment, where different Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) are identified and exploited to assess the maintenance approach at stake. Results: A comparison among different scenarios considered helped in identify the solution offered to the transport operator. In particular, for the case study of interest a −35% decrease in maintenance specific cost and −44% in cost variability were found. Reliability of the fleet was kept at an acceptable level compared to the reference in-house maintenance (≥90%) while an increase in the Mean Time Between Failure was observed. Conclusions: For the purposes of a small company, the method can address the choice of outsourcing maintenance as the best. Finally, a general trend is then extrapolated from the analysis performed, in order to constitute a decision guideline. The research can benefit from further analysis to test and validate that the selected approach is effective from the perspective of transport operator.","PeriodicalId":507203,"journal":{"name":"Logistics","volume":"52 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Logistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/logistics8020055","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The ongoing technical innovation is fully involving transportation sector, converting the usual mass-transit system toward a sustainable mobility. Make-or-buy decision are usually adopted to assess different solutions in terms of costs-benefits to put in place strategic choices regarding in-house production or from an external supplier. This can also be reflected on maintenance operations, thus replicating a similar approach to transport companies involved. Method: A decision-making model by means of a multi-criteria analysis can lead make-or-buy choices adapted to maintenance. A brief introduction into the actual mobility context is provided, evaluating global and national trends with respect to the mobility solutions offered. Then, a focus is set on maintenance approaches in mobility sector and the need of a make-or-buy decision process is considered. The decision-making path is developed through a multi-criteria framework based on eigenvector weighing assessment, where different Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) are identified and exploited to assess the maintenance approach at stake. Results: A comparison among different scenarios considered helped in identify the solution offered to the transport operator. In particular, for the case study of interest a −35% decrease in maintenance specific cost and −44% in cost variability were found. Reliability of the fleet was kept at an acceptable level compared to the reference in-house maintenance (≥90%) while an increase in the Mean Time Between Failure was observed. Conclusions: For the purposes of a small company, the method can address the choice of outsourcing maintenance as the best. Finally, a general trend is then extrapolated from the analysis performed, in order to constitute a decision guideline. The research can benefit from further analysis to test and validate that the selected approach is effective from the perspective of transport operator.
流动性维护规划中的 "买或卖 "决策:多标准方法
背景:当前的技术革新正全面涉及交通领域,将通常的大众交通系统转变为可持续的交通方式。通常采用 "要么做,要么买 "的决策,从成本效益的角度评估不同的解决方案,从而对内部生产或外部供应商做出战略选择。这也可以反映在维护操作上,从而将类似的方法复制到相关的运输公司。方法:通过多标准分析的决策模型,可以为维护工作做出 "要么做,要么买 "的选择。首先简要介绍了实际的交通环境,评估了所提供的交通解决方案的全球和国家趋势。然后,重点介绍了移动领域的维护方法,并考虑了 "要么做,要么买 "决策过程的必要性。决策路径是通过基于特征向量权衡评估的多标准框架制定的,其中确定了不同的关键绩效指标 (KPI),并利用这些指标来评估所涉及的维护方法。结果:对不同方案的比较有助于确定为运输运营商提供的解决方案。特别是在相关案例研究中,发现维护的具体成本降低了 35%,成本变化率降低了 44%。与参考的内部维护相比,机队的可靠性保持在可接受的水平(≥90%),同时观察到平均故障间隔时间有所增加。结论:对于小公司而言,该方法可以解决选择外包维护的最佳问题。最后,从所做的分析中推断出一个总体趋势,以作为决策指南。从运输运营商的角度来看,进一步分析以测试和验证所选择的方法是否有效,会对研究有所裨益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信