Varieties of work-based higher education: France, Germany and the United States compared

IF 1.5 Q3 MANAGEMENT

International Journal of Training and Development Pub Date : 2024-05-20 DOI:10.1111/ijtd.12329

Lukas Graf, Anna P. Lohse, Nadine Bernhard

引用次数: 0

Abstract

In recent years, higher education systems worldwide have been marked by a considerable expansion of work-based higher education (WBHE), with the institutional spheres of academia, industry and state increasingly coming together. We take the case of WBHE to analyse institutional arrangements in the different skill formation systems of France, Germany and the United States. We ask: Which factors drive the development of WBHE programmes and how does their governance compare across the three distinct country settings? The study finds that the growth of WBHE in all three countries indicates a reconfiguration of education and training governance of high skills. Nonetheless, actor constellations, organizational interests and especially the degree of state intervention surrounding WBHE remain anchored in long-standing national skill formation patterns.

查看原文本刊更多论文

以工作为基础的高等教育的多样性：法国、德国和美国的比较

近年来，随着学术界、产业界和国家机构的日益融合，以工作为基础的高等教育（WBHE）在全球高等教育体系中得到了显著扩展。我们以基于工作的高等教育为例，分析法国、德国和美国不同技能培养体系中的制度安排。我们要问：哪些因素推动了世界预算和高等教育计划的发展？研究发现，世界预算和高等教育在这三个国家的发展表明了高技能教育和培训管理的重新配置。尽管如此，围绕世行高等教育的参与者组合、组织利益，特别是国家干预的程度，仍然植根于长期存在的国家技能形成模式。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

International Journal of Training and Development MANAGEMENT-

CiteScore

3.40

自引率

11.10%

发文量

期刊介绍： Increasing international competition has led governments and corporations to focus on ways of improving national and corporate economic performance. The effective use of human resources is seen as a prerequisite, and the training and development of employees as paramount. The growth of training and development as an academic subject reflects its growth in practice. The International Journal of Training and Development is an international forum for the reporting of high-quality, original, empirical research. Multidisciplinary, international and comparative, the journal publishes research which ranges from the theoretical, conceptual and methodological to more policy-oriented types of work. The scope of the Journal is training and development, broadly defined. This includes: The determinants of training specifying and testing the explanatory variables which may be related to training identifying and analysing specific factors which give rise to a need for training and development as well as the processes by which those needs become defined, for example, training needs analysis the need for performance improvement the training and development implications of various performance improvement techniques, such as appraisal and assessment the analysis of competence Training and development practice the design, development and delivery of training the learning and development process itself competency-based approaches evaluation: the relationship between training and individual, corporate and macroeconomic performance Policy and strategy organisational aspects of training and development public policy issues questions of infrastructure issues relating to the training and development profession The Journal’s scope encompasses both corporate and public policy analysis. International and comparative work is particularly welcome, as is research which embraces emerging issues and developments.