Comparative Study of Predictive Classification Models on Data with Severely Imbalanced Predictors

E. Rohaeti, Ani Andriyati
{"title":"Comparative Study of Predictive Classification Models on Data with Severely Imbalanced Predictors","authors":"E. Rohaeti, Ani Andriyati","doi":"10.30595/juita.v12i1.21491","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Analysing pre-COVID-19 unemployment in West Java is vital for comprehending and tackling Indonesia’s economic challenges. This significance arises not only due to the region’s high unemployment rate, but also from the need to understand unemployment patterns before COVID-19, which has become more relevant now during the country’s post-pandemic recovery phase. This study evaluates four machine learning models (Random Forest, Linear SVM, RBF SVM, and Polynomial SVM) to classify employment status using demographic and job-related variables. The objective is to find the most suitable model, particularly considering the imbalanced nature of the study-case data. Data from the National Labor Force Survey (SAKERNAS) in August 2019 is utilized, comprising 54,429 respondents across districts in West Java. The four models are evaluated using holdout validation with a 70:30 stratified proportion, repeated for 100 times. Results indicate that the random forest model outperforms others in balanced accuracy, F1-score, and computational time. The random forest model also underscores the importance of gender and age in classifying employment status in West Java, suggesting a need for targeted intervention, especially for female citizens and individuals in productive age groups.","PeriodicalId":151254,"journal":{"name":"JUITA : Jurnal Informatika","volume":"21 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JUITA : Jurnal Informatika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30595/juita.v12i1.21491","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Analysing pre-COVID-19 unemployment in West Java is vital for comprehending and tackling Indonesia’s economic challenges. This significance arises not only due to the region’s high unemployment rate, but also from the need to understand unemployment patterns before COVID-19, which has become more relevant now during the country’s post-pandemic recovery phase. This study evaluates four machine learning models (Random Forest, Linear SVM, RBF SVM, and Polynomial SVM) to classify employment status using demographic and job-related variables. The objective is to find the most suitable model, particularly considering the imbalanced nature of the study-case data. Data from the National Labor Force Survey (SAKERNAS) in August 2019 is utilized, comprising 54,429 respondents across districts in West Java. The four models are evaluated using holdout validation with a 70:30 stratified proportion, repeated for 100 times. Results indicate that the random forest model outperforms others in balanced accuracy, F1-score, and computational time. The random forest model also underscores the importance of gender and age in classifying employment status in West Java, suggesting a need for targeted intervention, especially for female citizens and individuals in productive age groups.
在预测因子严重失衡的数据上对预测分类模型进行比较研究
分析西爪哇省 COVID-19 前的失业情况对于理解和应对印尼的经济挑战至关重要。其重要性不仅在于该地区的高失业率,还在于需要了解 COVID-19 之前的失业模式,而这在该国的疫后恢复阶段变得更加重要。本研究评估了四种机器学习模型(随机森林模型、线性 SVM 模型、RBF SVM 模型和多项式 SVM 模型),以利用人口统计和工作相关变量对就业状况进行分类。目的是找到最合适的模型,特别是考虑到研究案例数据的不平衡性。本研究使用的数据来自 2019 年 8 月的全国劳动力调查(SAKERNAS),包括西爪哇各地区的 54 429 名受访者。采用 70:30 的分层比例对四个模型进行了保留验证,重复 100 次。结果表明,随机森林模型在均衡准确性、F1-分数和计算时间方面均优于其他模型。随机森林模型还强调了性别和年龄在西爪哇就业状况分类中的重要性,表明有必要采取有针对性的干预措施,尤其是针对女性公民和生产年龄组的个人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信