Effectiveness of Ceftazidime/Avibactam treatment for infections caused by Klebsiella pneumoniae Carbapenemase (KPC), a 30-day mortality perspective. Comparison of results with control groups treated with other antibiotics

Patrycja Paschke, Igor Miczek, Maria Sambura, Sara Rosołowska-Żak, Julia Pałuchowska, Anna Szymkowicz
{"title":"Effectiveness of Ceftazidime/Avibactam treatment for infections caused by Klebsiella pneumoniae Carbapenemase (KPC), a 30-day mortality perspective. Comparison of results with control groups treated with other antibiotics","authors":"Patrycja Paschke, Igor Miczek, Maria Sambura, Sara Rosołowska-Żak, Julia Pałuchowska, Anna Szymkowicz","doi":"10.12775/jehs.2024.71.49182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Infections caused by Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC) pose a significant clinical challenge due to increasing antibiotic resistance. This study analyzes the effectiveness of ceftazidime/avibactam treatment for KPC infections, focusing on 30-day mortality and comparing results with control groups treated with different antibiotics. \n Material and methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of six cohort studies, comparing thirty-day mortality in patients treated with ceftazidime/avibactam with control groups using other antibiotics. The studies included patients infected with KPC, and the analysis focused on therapeutic effectiveness.\nAim of the study: The aim of the study is to compare the results in terms of 30-day mortality in groups treated with ceftazidime/avibactam compared to control groups using different antibiotics.\n \nConclusions: Data analysis from various studies revealed varied 30-day mortality outcomes in groups treated with ceftazidime/avibactam compared to control groups using different antibiotics. Ceftazidime/avibactam proved to be more effective in all studies, reducing mortality rates compared to other treatment regimens. We emphasize that emerging antibiotic resistance, especially in the case of KPC, requires a comprehensive therapeutic approach. Despite promising ceftazidime/avibactam results, factors such as overall patient health and treatment delays may influence final therapy outcomes. We also highlight controversies regarding combination therapy vs. monotherapy, necessitating further research. Our work underscores the importance of monitoring the effectiveness of KPC infection treatment and exploring new therapeutic strategies. Further clinical studies are essential to develop a fuller understanding and optimal therapeutic protocols in the face of the growing antibiotic resistance problem.","PeriodicalId":15567,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Education, Health and Sport","volume":"22 23","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Education, Health and Sport","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12775/jehs.2024.71.49182","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Infections caused by Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC) pose a significant clinical challenge due to increasing antibiotic resistance. This study analyzes the effectiveness of ceftazidime/avibactam treatment for KPC infections, focusing on 30-day mortality and comparing results with control groups treated with different antibiotics. Material and methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of six cohort studies, comparing thirty-day mortality in patients treated with ceftazidime/avibactam with control groups using other antibiotics. The studies included patients infected with KPC, and the analysis focused on therapeutic effectiveness. Aim of the study: The aim of the study is to compare the results in terms of 30-day mortality in groups treated with ceftazidime/avibactam compared to control groups using different antibiotics.   Conclusions: Data analysis from various studies revealed varied 30-day mortality outcomes in groups treated with ceftazidime/avibactam compared to control groups using different antibiotics. Ceftazidime/avibactam proved to be more effective in all studies, reducing mortality rates compared to other treatment regimens. We emphasize that emerging antibiotic resistance, especially in the case of KPC, requires a comprehensive therapeutic approach. Despite promising ceftazidime/avibactam results, factors such as overall patient health and treatment delays may influence final therapy outcomes. We also highlight controversies regarding combination therapy vs. monotherapy, necessitating further research. Our work underscores the importance of monitoring the effectiveness of KPC infection treatment and exploring new therapeutic strategies. Further clinical studies are essential to develop a fuller understanding and optimal therapeutic protocols in the face of the growing antibiotic resistance problem.
头孢他啶/阿维菌素治疗肺炎克雷伯氏菌碳青霉烯酶(KPC)引起的感染的疗效,30 天死亡率透视。与使用其他抗生素治疗的对照组结果比较
导言:由于抗生素耐药性的增加,肺炎克雷伯菌碳青霉烯酶(KPC)引起的感染给临床带来了巨大挑战。本研究分析了头孢他啶/阿维巴坦治疗 KPC 感染的有效性,重点关注 30 天死亡率,并将结果与使用不同抗生素治疗的对照组进行比较。 材料和方法:我们对六项队列研究进行了回顾性分析,比较了使用头孢他啶/阿维巴坦治疗的患者与使用其他抗生素的对照组的 30 天死亡率。这些研究包括感染 KPC 的患者,分析的重点是治疗效果:研究目的:本研究旨在比较头孢他啶/阿维巴坦治疗组与使用不同抗生素的对照组在 30 天死亡率方面的结果。研究结论不同研究的数据分析显示,与使用不同抗生素的对照组相比,头孢他啶/阿维巴坦治疗组的 30 天死亡率结果各不相同。与其他治疗方案相比,头孢他啶/阿维巴坦在所有研究中被证明更有效,可降低死亡率。我们强调,新出现的抗生素耐药性,尤其是对 KPC 的耐药性,需要采取综合治疗方法。尽管头孢他啶/阿维巴坦的治疗效果很好,但患者的整体健康状况和治疗延迟等因素可能会影响最终的治疗结果。我们还强调了联合疗法与单一疗法之间的争议,因此有必要开展进一步研究。我们的工作强调了监测 KPC 感染治疗效果和探索新治疗策略的重要性。面对日益严重的抗生素耐药性问题,进一步的临床研究对于更全面地了解和制定最佳治疗方案至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信