“View and Hide Definitions” of Racist Hate Speech: Ethnophaulisms in Google’s English Dictionary

Silvia Pettini
{"title":"“View and Hide Definitions” of Racist Hate Speech: Ethnophaulisms in Google’s English Dictionary","authors":"Silvia Pettini","doi":"10.5539/ijel.v14n3p1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper aims to foster debate about the language of racist hate speech in online English lexicography. For this purpose, it presents a study on the treatment of ethnophaulisms, or ethnic slurs, in “powered by Oxford Languages” Google’s English dictionary. The focus is indeed on the perspective of the general user of the Internet, in light of the connection between two facets of this digital age. The first one is the strong and growing tendency among Internet users to ‘google’ their language issues. The second one is the alarming increase in cases of hate speech online, most of which are based on ethnicity and nationality, according to reports by the United Nations. Consequently, the free and pervasive content of Google’s English dictionary represents a case in point to investigate whether and how online users are warned against the power of these hate words. A selected sample of 285 English ethnic slurs have been looked up in the dictionary and, if recorded, their entries have been scrutinised to identify lexicographic data regarding their semantic relevance and offensiveness. Findings show that the majority are included, they mostly present ethnicity-related senses, but less than half of the total are treated as ethnophaulisms. In this respect, the major dictionary markers indicating offensiveness are effect labels, predominantly alone or combined with definitions. Relative to their size, thus, ethnophaulisms in Google’s English dictionary are clearly described as offensive or derogatory expressions, thus making online users aware of their hurtful nature.","PeriodicalId":91092,"journal":{"name":"International journal of English linguistics","volume":"8 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of English linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v14n3p1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper aims to foster debate about the language of racist hate speech in online English lexicography. For this purpose, it presents a study on the treatment of ethnophaulisms, or ethnic slurs, in “powered by Oxford Languages” Google’s English dictionary. The focus is indeed on the perspective of the general user of the Internet, in light of the connection between two facets of this digital age. The first one is the strong and growing tendency among Internet users to ‘google’ their language issues. The second one is the alarming increase in cases of hate speech online, most of which are based on ethnicity and nationality, according to reports by the United Nations. Consequently, the free and pervasive content of Google’s English dictionary represents a case in point to investigate whether and how online users are warned against the power of these hate words. A selected sample of 285 English ethnic slurs have been looked up in the dictionary and, if recorded, their entries have been scrutinised to identify lexicographic data regarding their semantic relevance and offensiveness. Findings show that the majority are included, they mostly present ethnicity-related senses, but less than half of the total are treated as ethnophaulisms. In this respect, the major dictionary markers indicating offensiveness are effect labels, predominantly alone or combined with definitions. Relative to their size, thus, ethnophaulisms in Google’s English dictionary are clearly described as offensive or derogatory expressions, thus making online users aware of their hurtful nature.
种族主义仇恨言论的 "查看和隐藏定义":谷歌英语词典中的 "种族 "一词
本文旨在促进对在线英语词典中种族主义仇恨言论语言的讨论。为此,本文研究了谷歌英语词典 "powered by Oxford Languages "中对种族诽谤(ethnophaulisms)的处理。鉴于这个数字时代的两个方面之间的联系,研究的重点实际上是互联网普通用户的视角。第一个方面是互联网用户 "谷歌 "他们的语言问题的强烈和日益增长的趋势。其次,根据联合国的报告,网上仇恨言论的数量惊人地增长,其中大部分是基于种族和国籍的。因此,谷歌英语词典的免费和无处不在的内容是一个很好的案例,可以用来调查是否以及如何提醒网络用户防范这些仇恨词汇的威力。我们在词典中选取了 285 个英语种族诽谤词样本进行查询,如果有记录,则对其条目进行仔细研究,以确定有关其语义相关性和冒犯性的词汇学数据。研究结果表明,大多数民族污言秽语都被收录,它们大多具有与民族相关的意义,但只有不到一半的民族污言秽语被视为民族污辱。在这方面,表明冒犯性的主要词典标记是效果标签,主要是单独或与定义相结合。因此,相对于其规模而言,谷歌英语词典中的ethnophaulisms被明确描述为冒犯性或贬损性表达,从而使在线用户意识到其伤害性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信