Connor Dalton, Chloe Edgar, Benjamin Tari, Matthew Heath
{"title":"Passive exercise provides a simultaneous and postexercise executive function benefit","authors":"Connor Dalton, Chloe Edgar, Benjamin Tari, Matthew Heath","doi":"10.3389/fcogn.2024.1334258","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Passive exercise involves limb movement via an external force and is an intervention providing an immediate postexercise executive function (EF) benefit. It is, however, unknown whether EF is improved simultaneous with passive exercise—a salient question given the advent of passive (and active) exercise workstations designed to enhance productivity and wellbeing for individuals engaged in sedentary occupations.Here, participants (N = 23) completed separate 20-min conditions involving active (i.e., via volitional muscle activation) and passive (i.e., via mechanically driven cycle ergometer) cycle ergometry and a non-exercise control condition. EF was assessed prior to (i.e., preintervention), simultaneous with, and immediately after (post-intervention) each condition via the antipointing task. Antipointing involves a goal-directed limb movement mirror-symmetrical to a target and is an ideal tool for the current investigation given that the task is mediated via EF inhibitory control networks that show response-dependent changes following a single bout of exercise.Results showed that passive exercise produced a simultaneous and post-intervention reduction in antipointing reaction time (RT), whereas active exercise selectively produced a post-intervention—but not simultaneous—RT reduction. Thus, passive and active exercise elicited a postexercise EF benefit; however, only passive exercise produced a simultaneous benefit. That passive—but not active—exercise produced a simultaneous benefit may reflect that the intervention provides the necessary physiological or psychological changes to elicit improved EF efficiency without the associated dual-task cost(s) of volitional muscle activity.","PeriodicalId":94013,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Cognition","volume":"39 15","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fcogn.2024.1334258","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Passive exercise involves limb movement via an external force and is an intervention providing an immediate postexercise executive function (EF) benefit. It is, however, unknown whether EF is improved simultaneous with passive exercise—a salient question given the advent of passive (and active) exercise workstations designed to enhance productivity and wellbeing for individuals engaged in sedentary occupations.Here, participants (N = 23) completed separate 20-min conditions involving active (i.e., via volitional muscle activation) and passive (i.e., via mechanically driven cycle ergometer) cycle ergometry and a non-exercise control condition. EF was assessed prior to (i.e., preintervention), simultaneous with, and immediately after (post-intervention) each condition via the antipointing task. Antipointing involves a goal-directed limb movement mirror-symmetrical to a target and is an ideal tool for the current investigation given that the task is mediated via EF inhibitory control networks that show response-dependent changes following a single bout of exercise.Results showed that passive exercise produced a simultaneous and post-intervention reduction in antipointing reaction time (RT), whereas active exercise selectively produced a post-intervention—but not simultaneous—RT reduction. Thus, passive and active exercise elicited a postexercise EF benefit; however, only passive exercise produced a simultaneous benefit. That passive—but not active—exercise produced a simultaneous benefit may reflect that the intervention provides the necessary physiological or psychological changes to elicit improved EF efficiency without the associated dual-task cost(s) of volitional muscle activity.
被动运动涉及通过外力进行肢体运动,是一种能在运动后立即改善执行功能(EF)的干预措施。这里,参与者(N = 23)分别完成了20分钟的主动(即通过意志肌肉激活)和被动(即通过机械驱动的自行车测力计)自行车测力以及非运动对照条件。通过反指向任务,在每个条件之前(即干预前)、同时和紧随其后(干预后)对EF进行评估。反指向任务包括与目标镜像对称的目标指向性肢体运动,是目前研究的理想工具,因为该任务是通过EF抑制控制网络介导的,而这些网络在单次运动后会出现反应依赖性变化。结果显示,被动运动会导致反指向反应时间(RT)同时和干预后缩短,而主动运动会选择性地导致干预后RT缩短,但不是同时缩短。因此,被动运动和主动运动都能在运动后产生 EF 益处;但只有被动运动能同时产生益处。被动运动--而非主动运动--产生了同步益处,这可能反映出干预措施提供了必要的生理或心理变化,从而提高了 EF 效率,而不需要意志肌肉活动的相关双任务成本。