{"title":"Topographic Effect on Body-Wave Polarization and Near-Surface Wave Speed Estimation","authors":"Yuanshen Li, Sunyoung Park","doi":"10.1093/gji/ggae181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This study examines the topographic effect on the body-wave polarization and, subsequently, on near-surface wave speed estimation. We first derive 3D P- and S-wave polarization angles in the presence of ground tilt, where the angles are functions of the ground tilt orientation, the near-surface wave speeds, and the incident wave direction. We find that S-wave polarization angle varies considerably (e.g., more than 100 %) when the incident angle is close to the critical angle. The counter-intuitive phenomenon for flat surface, that is, P-wave polarization being only sensitive to S- but not P-wave speeds, breaks down in the presence of ground tilt, i.e., P-wave polarization becomes sensitive to both P- and S-wave speeds. Examining the differences in the inferred wave speeds with and without the flat-surface assumption reveals that bias in wave speed estimates is, in general, higher for smaller incident angles, e.g., about 50 % or higher for a 15○ ground tilt and near-vertical (<5○) incidence. The effect on P-wave speed estimates is also significant when the S-wave incident angle approaches the critical angle. In order to investigate the topographic effect on wave speed estimates inferred using teleseismic polarization data, we revisit the near-surface wave speeds estimates at Hi-net stations from Park and Ishii (2018). Based on the ground tilt and strike angles measured at 300-m scale for each Hi-net site, we constrain P- and S-wave speeds utilizing the P-wave polarization data. We find that P-wave polarization data alone can effectively constrain not only S- but also P-wave speeds, especially when the ground tilt is sufficiently large (e.g., >5○). Furthermore, our additional test suggests that including S-wave polarization data with the tilt consideration will improve the near-surface wave speeds estimates significantly compared to when the tilt effect is ignored.","PeriodicalId":502458,"journal":{"name":"Geophysical Journal International","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geophysical Journal International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggae181","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study examines the topographic effect on the body-wave polarization and, subsequently, on near-surface wave speed estimation. We first derive 3D P- and S-wave polarization angles in the presence of ground tilt, where the angles are functions of the ground tilt orientation, the near-surface wave speeds, and the incident wave direction. We find that S-wave polarization angle varies considerably (e.g., more than 100 %) when the incident angle is close to the critical angle. The counter-intuitive phenomenon for flat surface, that is, P-wave polarization being only sensitive to S- but not P-wave speeds, breaks down in the presence of ground tilt, i.e., P-wave polarization becomes sensitive to both P- and S-wave speeds. Examining the differences in the inferred wave speeds with and without the flat-surface assumption reveals that bias in wave speed estimates is, in general, higher for smaller incident angles, e.g., about 50 % or higher for a 15○ ground tilt and near-vertical (<5○) incidence. The effect on P-wave speed estimates is also significant when the S-wave incident angle approaches the critical angle. In order to investigate the topographic effect on wave speed estimates inferred using teleseismic polarization data, we revisit the near-surface wave speeds estimates at Hi-net stations from Park and Ishii (2018). Based on the ground tilt and strike angles measured at 300-m scale for each Hi-net site, we constrain P- and S-wave speeds utilizing the P-wave polarization data. We find that P-wave polarization data alone can effectively constrain not only S- but also P-wave speeds, especially when the ground tilt is sufficiently large (e.g., >5○). Furthermore, our additional test suggests that including S-wave polarization data with the tilt consideration will improve the near-surface wave speeds estimates significantly compared to when the tilt effect is ignored.
本研究探讨了地形对体波极化的影响,以及随后对近表面波速度估算的影响。我们首先推导了地面倾斜情况下的三维 P 波和 S 波极化角,其中极化角是地面倾斜方向、近地表波速和入射波方向的函数。我们发现,当入射角接近临界角时,S 波极化角变化很大(例如,超过 100%)。在地表平坦的情况下,P 波极化只对 S 波速度敏感,而对 P 波速度不敏感,这种与直觉相反的现象在地面倾斜的情况下被打破,即 P 波极化对 P 波和 S 波速度都变得敏感。通过研究使用和不使用平坦表面假设时推断波速的差异,可以发现,一般来说,入射角度越小,波速估计值的偏差就越大,例如,地面倾斜度为 15○和接近垂直(5○)时,偏差约为 50%或更高。此外,我们的附加测试表明,与忽略倾斜效应时相比,将 S 波极化数据与倾斜考虑在一起将显著提高近地表波速估计值。