Assessing Pressure Wave Components for Aortic Stiffness Monitoring through Spectral Regression Learning

Arian Aghilinejad, Morteza Gharib
{"title":"Assessing Pressure Wave Components for Aortic Stiffness Monitoring through Spectral Regression Learning","authors":"Arian Aghilinejad, Morteza Gharib","doi":"10.1093/ehjopen/oeae040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n The aging process notably induces structural changes in the arterial system, primarily manifesting as increased aortic stiffness, a precursor to cardiovascular events. While wave separation analysis is a robust tool for decomposing the components of blood pressure waveform, its relationship with cardiovascular events, such as aortic stiffening, is incompletely understood. Furthermore, its applicability has been limited due to the need for concurrent measurements of pressure and flow. Our aim in this study addresses this gap by introducing a spectral regression learning method for pressure-only wave separation analysis.\n \n \n \n Leveraging data from the Framingham Heart Study (2,640 individuals, 55% women), we evaluate the accuracy of pressure-only estimates, their interchangeability with reference method based on ultrasound-derived flow waves, and their association with Carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity. Method-derived estimates are strongly correlated with the reference ones for forward wave amplitude (R2=0.91), backward wave amplitude (R2=0.88), reflection index (R2=0.87), and moderately correlated with time delay between forward and backward waves (R2=0.38). The proposed pressure-only method shows interchangeability with reference method through covariate analysis. Adjusting for age, sex, body size, mean blood pressure, and heart rate, results suggest that both pressure-only and pressure-flow evaluations of wave separation parameters yield similar model performance for predicting Carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity with forward wave amplitude as the only significant factor (p < 0.001; 95% confidence interval, 0.056-0.097).\n \n \n \n We propose an interchangeable pressure-only wave separation analysis method and demonstrate its clinical applicability in capturing aortic stiffening. The proposed method provides valuable non-invasive tool for assessing cardiovascular health.\n","PeriodicalId":93995,"journal":{"name":"European heart journal open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European heart journal open","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjopen/oeae040","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aging process notably induces structural changes in the arterial system, primarily manifesting as increased aortic stiffness, a precursor to cardiovascular events. While wave separation analysis is a robust tool for decomposing the components of blood pressure waveform, its relationship with cardiovascular events, such as aortic stiffening, is incompletely understood. Furthermore, its applicability has been limited due to the need for concurrent measurements of pressure and flow. Our aim in this study addresses this gap by introducing a spectral regression learning method for pressure-only wave separation analysis. Leveraging data from the Framingham Heart Study (2,640 individuals, 55% women), we evaluate the accuracy of pressure-only estimates, their interchangeability with reference method based on ultrasound-derived flow waves, and their association with Carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity. Method-derived estimates are strongly correlated with the reference ones for forward wave amplitude (R2=0.91), backward wave amplitude (R2=0.88), reflection index (R2=0.87), and moderately correlated with time delay between forward and backward waves (R2=0.38). The proposed pressure-only method shows interchangeability with reference method through covariate analysis. Adjusting for age, sex, body size, mean blood pressure, and heart rate, results suggest that both pressure-only and pressure-flow evaluations of wave separation parameters yield similar model performance for predicting Carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity with forward wave amplitude as the only significant factor (p < 0.001; 95% confidence interval, 0.056-0.097). We propose an interchangeable pressure-only wave separation analysis method and demonstrate its clinical applicability in capturing aortic stiffening. The proposed method provides valuable non-invasive tool for assessing cardiovascular health.
通过频谱回归学习评估主动脉僵硬度监测的压力波成分
衰老过程会明显诱发动脉系统的结构变化,主要表现为主动脉僵化,这是心血管事件的前兆。虽然波形分离分析是分解血压波形成分的有力工具,但其与心血管事件(如主动脉僵化)之间的关系尚未完全明了。此外,由于需要同时测量血压和血流,其适用性也受到了限制。我们在这项研究中引入了光谱回归学习方法,用于纯压力波分离分析,从而弥补了这一不足。 利用弗雷明汉心脏研究(2,640 人,55% 为女性)的数据,我们评估了纯压力估计值的准确性、其与基于超声波衍生流动波的参考方法的互换性,以及其与颈动脉-股动脉脉搏波速度的关联性。在前向波振幅(R2=0.91)、后向波振幅(R2=0.88)和反射指数(R2=0.87)方面,该方法得出的估计值与参考值有很强的相关性,而与前向波和后向波之间的时间延迟(R2=0.38)有中度相关性。通过协变量分析,拟议的纯压力方法与参考方法具有互换性。调整年龄、性别、体型、平均血压和心率后,结果表明,在预测颈动脉-股动脉脉搏波速度时,纯压力和压力-流量评估波分离参数的模型性能相似,前向波振幅是唯一显著的因素(p < 0.001;95% 置信区间,0.056-0.097)。 我们提出了一种可互换的纯压力波分离分析方法,并证明了它在捕捉主动脉僵化方面的临床适用性。所提出的方法为评估心血管健康提供了有价值的无创工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信