Face-To-Face Versus Online Learning: First-Year Students’ Experiences of Academic Writing

Angelo Meyers, Cornelia Smith, M. Cekiso
{"title":"Face-To-Face Versus Online Learning: First-Year Students’ Experiences of Academic Writing","authors":"Angelo Meyers, Cornelia Smith, M. Cekiso","doi":"10.38159/ehass.20245516","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Encountering challenges in academic writing is inevitable for first-year students who are yet to become familiar with the writing patterns and structure. Students often struggle with the change; online learning and its advantages have not fully materialised due to the disruptions, familiarity, resistance, and problems associated with technology. The purpose of the study was to examine first-year students’ experience with the face-to-face learning model and blended learning model at TVET College in Western Cape South Africa.The study employed a mixed-method approach to collect data from the research participants. The online questionnaire was adopted as the instrument of data collection for the quantitative data and 185 participants completed the questionnaire. An interview schedule guide was the instrument of data collection for the qualitative data and twelve (12) students voluntarily participated in the semi-structured interviews. Findings from both the quantitative data and qualitative data revealed that mere technology is not as effective since integrating it into teaching approaches and providing students with interactive activities and collaboration can enhance their academic performance. Face-to-face contact remains a vital part of teaching and learning, and this conclusion emphasises that blended learning is a novel and valuable way to reach students, underscoring the combination of both face-to-face and online learning. This article makes an important contribution to higher education (HE) and learning models by examining the first-year students’ experience of learning models at a South African Technical and Vocational Education and Technology (TVET) college in the Western Cape.\n\nKeywords: Blended Learning Applications, Distance Education, English Second Language, Face-to-face, First-year Students, Writing, Online learning.","PeriodicalId":212587,"journal":{"name":"E-Journal of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"E-Journal of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.38159/ehass.20245516","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Encountering challenges in academic writing is inevitable for first-year students who are yet to become familiar with the writing patterns and structure. Students often struggle with the change; online learning and its advantages have not fully materialised due to the disruptions, familiarity, resistance, and problems associated with technology. The purpose of the study was to examine first-year students’ experience with the face-to-face learning model and blended learning model at TVET College in Western Cape South Africa.The study employed a mixed-method approach to collect data from the research participants. The online questionnaire was adopted as the instrument of data collection for the quantitative data and 185 participants completed the questionnaire. An interview schedule guide was the instrument of data collection for the qualitative data and twelve (12) students voluntarily participated in the semi-structured interviews. Findings from both the quantitative data and qualitative data revealed that mere technology is not as effective since integrating it into teaching approaches and providing students with interactive activities and collaboration can enhance their academic performance. Face-to-face contact remains a vital part of teaching and learning, and this conclusion emphasises that blended learning is a novel and valuable way to reach students, underscoring the combination of both face-to-face and online learning. This article makes an important contribution to higher education (HE) and learning models by examining the first-year students’ experience of learning models at a South African Technical and Vocational Education and Technology (TVET) college in the Western Cape. Keywords: Blended Learning Applications, Distance Education, English Second Language, Face-to-face, First-year Students, Writing, Online learning.
面对面学习与在线学习:一年级学生的学术写作体验
对于尚未熟悉写作模式和结构的一年级学生来说,在学术写作中遇到挑战是不可避免的。学生们往往在改变中挣扎;由于技术带来的干扰、熟悉程度、阻力和问题,在线学习及其优势并没有完全体现出来。本研究旨在考察南非西开普省技术与职业教育培训学院一年级学生对面授学习模式和混合学习模式的体验。定量数据采用在线问卷作为数据收集工具,共有 185 名参与者填写了问卷。定性数据的收集工具是访谈日程指南,12 名学生自愿参加了半结构化访谈。定量数据和定性数据的研究结果表明,将技术融入教学方法并为学生提供互动活动和协作可以提高他们的学业成绩,因此单纯的技术并不那么有效。面对面接触仍然是教学的重要组成部分,这一结论强调了混合式学习是接触学生的一种新颖而有价值的方式,强调了面对面学习和在线学习的结合。本文通过研究南非西开普省一所技术和职业教育与技术(TVET)学院一年级学生对学习模式的体验,为高等教育(HE)和学习模式做出了重要贡献:混合式学习应用、远程教育、英语第二语言、面授、一年级学生、写作、在线学习。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信