Teamwork significantly improves pathology slide diagnosis: students’ perspective

Dragan Jovanovic, Tatjana Gazibara, Adlekha Shashikanth, Olubukola Yeku, Andrew Wolfram, Christina Krupinsky, Teya Van Biljouw Bath
{"title":"Teamwork significantly improves pathology slide diagnosis: students’ perspective","authors":"Dragan Jovanovic, Tatjana Gazibara, Adlekha Shashikanth, Olubukola Yeku, Andrew Wolfram, Christina Krupinsky, Teya Van Biljouw Bath","doi":"10.37022/wjcmpr.v6i2.327","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background & objectives: Team-based learning is a pedagogical strategy that enhances student knowledge through individual testing and group collaboration. The objective of this preliminary study was to examine if students’ collaborative annotation improved understanding of microscopic morphology and diagnosis of pathological slides. \nMethods: Mean individual and then group scores of pathology slides analysis by Path2 students were compared by the Wilcoxon signed rank test and group differences by ANOVA. Students' attitudes toward TBL were examined using a short 8-item questionnaire which graded responses on a 5-point Likert scale. Analyses were performed in the SPSS version 20.Probability level of p<0.05 was statistically significant. \nResults: The average individual scores ranged from 44.0 to 50.0 out of 100. The differences between the groups were not observed. The average group scores ranged from 75.0 to 82.0percentage. Compared with the average individual score, all group scores were statisticallysignificantly higher (p<0.001). Group scores among students who had low performance were statistically significantly higher compared to their individual scores. This was also observed among high performance students (p<0.003). In terms of TBL attitudes, all average attitude scores were positive (the highest were reported for active learning). Attitudes score did notcorrelate with the Path1 grade. No difference in attitudes was found between high and low performing students. \nConclusion: Group analysis of pathology slides significantly improves the success in making a pathological diagnosis, both for low performance and for high performance students. The strongest positive attitude was observed for “Promotes opportunity for active learning”, “Group dynamics potentiate learning outcome” and “Encourage discussion for differential diagnosis”. We progressively incorporated these collaborative approaches into virtual environment in pathology courses at our medical faculty that have been shown to further improve students’ engagement and learning outcomes, promotes opportunities for active engagement and interaction.","PeriodicalId":23642,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Current Medical and Pharmaceutical Research","volume":"62 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Current Medical and Pharmaceutical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37022/wjcmpr.v6i2.327","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background & objectives: Team-based learning is a pedagogical strategy that enhances student knowledge through individual testing and group collaboration. The objective of this preliminary study was to examine if students’ collaborative annotation improved understanding of microscopic morphology and diagnosis of pathological slides. Methods: Mean individual and then group scores of pathology slides analysis by Path2 students were compared by the Wilcoxon signed rank test and group differences by ANOVA. Students' attitudes toward TBL were examined using a short 8-item questionnaire which graded responses on a 5-point Likert scale. Analyses were performed in the SPSS version 20.Probability level of p<0.05 was statistically significant. Results: The average individual scores ranged from 44.0 to 50.0 out of 100. The differences between the groups were not observed. The average group scores ranged from 75.0 to 82.0percentage. Compared with the average individual score, all group scores were statisticallysignificantly higher (p<0.001). Group scores among students who had low performance were statistically significantly higher compared to their individual scores. This was also observed among high performance students (p<0.003). In terms of TBL attitudes, all average attitude scores were positive (the highest were reported for active learning). Attitudes score did notcorrelate with the Path1 grade. No difference in attitudes was found between high and low performing students. Conclusion: Group analysis of pathology slides significantly improves the success in making a pathological diagnosis, both for low performance and for high performance students. The strongest positive attitude was observed for “Promotes opportunity for active learning”, “Group dynamics potentiate learning outcome” and “Encourage discussion for differential diagnosis”. We progressively incorporated these collaborative approaches into virtual environment in pathology courses at our medical faculty that have been shown to further improve students’ engagement and learning outcomes, promotes opportunities for active engagement and interaction.
团队合作明显改善病理切片诊断:学生的观点
背景与目标:基于团队的学习是一种通过个人测试和小组合作来增强学生知识的教学策略。本初步研究的目的是探讨学生通过合作注释是否能提高对病理切片显微形态学和诊断的理解。研究方法:通过 Wilcoxon 符号秩检验比较 Path2 学生病理切片分析的个人平均分和小组平均分,通过方差分析比较小组差异。学生对 TBL 的态度采用 8 个项目的简短问卷进行调查,问卷采用 5 点李克特量表进行评分。分析在 SPSS 20 版本中进行,P<0.05 为具有统计学意义。结果个人平均得分在 44.0 到 50.0 之间(满分 100 分)。没有观察到组间差异。小组平均得分介于 75.0 到 82.0 之间。与个人平均得分相比,所有小组得分在统计上都显著较高(P<0.001)。在统计上,成绩差的学生的小组得分明显高于他们的个人得分。在成绩优秀的学生中也观察到了这种情况(p<0.003)。在 TBL 态度方面,所有学生的平均态度得分都是积极的(主动学习的学生得分最高)。态度得分与 Path1 成绩无关。成绩好的学生和成绩差的学生在态度上没有差异。结论无论是成绩差的学生还是成绩好的学生,对病理切片进行小组分析都能明显提高病理诊断的成功率。在 "促进主动学习的机会"、"小组动态提高学习效果 "和 "鼓励讨论鉴别诊断 "方面,学生的态度最为积极。我们逐步将这些协作方法纳入本医学院病理学课程的虚拟环境中,结果表明这些方法能进一步提高学生的参与度和学习效果,促进积极参与和互动的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信