The Darwinian Theory of Evolution and Creation Account of Genesis: Contradiction or Complementary?

I. Boaheng
{"title":"The Darwinian Theory of Evolution and Creation Account of Genesis: Contradiction or Complementary?","authors":"I. Boaheng","doi":"10.38159/erats.20241056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The question of the origin of humans has been fiercely contested for a long period. One perspective is the creation model, which asserts that the Universe and all its components emerged through the deliberate actions of God, driven by design and purpose. Conversely, the evolution model posits that the Universe’s formation occurred solely through mechanistic processes, devoid of any supernatural intervention. Narrowing the scope to humanity, the evolution model contends for the gradual evolution of the human species through a process of descent with modification from an ancestor shared with apes, while the creation model proposes the direct creation of humankind by God in his image. Certainly, the implications either model has on human dignity are very important for human existence. Whether God created humankind directly or through evolution from an ape-like ancestor has a bearing on human dignity. It raises, for example, the question as to whose image humanity bears: God’s or apes’? The way one answers this question will definitely affect his or her human-divine and human-human relationships. A literary research approach was used to gather data from books, articles, and dissertations. The data were critically examined to consider the arguments for either side of the debate. It was found out that both biblical and scientific data may allow for variations within a particular species (microevolution) but not the production of one species from another (macroevolution). The findings suggest that the creation model must be accepted with its attendant implications for human dignity.\n\nKeywords: Evolution, Creation, Human Dignity, Origin","PeriodicalId":504182,"journal":{"name":"E-Journal of Religious and Theological Studies","volume":"119 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"E-Journal of Religious and Theological Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.38159/erats.20241056","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The question of the origin of humans has been fiercely contested for a long period. One perspective is the creation model, which asserts that the Universe and all its components emerged through the deliberate actions of God, driven by design and purpose. Conversely, the evolution model posits that the Universe’s formation occurred solely through mechanistic processes, devoid of any supernatural intervention. Narrowing the scope to humanity, the evolution model contends for the gradual evolution of the human species through a process of descent with modification from an ancestor shared with apes, while the creation model proposes the direct creation of humankind by God in his image. Certainly, the implications either model has on human dignity are very important for human existence. Whether God created humankind directly or through evolution from an ape-like ancestor has a bearing on human dignity. It raises, for example, the question as to whose image humanity bears: God’s or apes’? The way one answers this question will definitely affect his or her human-divine and human-human relationships. A literary research approach was used to gather data from books, articles, and dissertations. The data were critically examined to consider the arguments for either side of the debate. It was found out that both biblical and scientific data may allow for variations within a particular species (microevolution) but not the production of one species from another (macroevolution). The findings suggest that the creation model must be accepted with its attendant implications for human dignity. Keywords: Evolution, Creation, Human Dignity, Origin
达尔文的进化论与《创世纪》的创世记:矛盾还是互补?
关于人类起源的问题,长期以来一直存在激烈的争论。其中一种观点是创世模式,认为宇宙及其所有组成部分都是在上帝的设计和目的驱动下蓄意产生的。相反,进化模式则认为宇宙的形成完全是通过机械过程,没有任何超自然的干预。将范围缩小到人类,进化模式认为人类是通过与类人猿共享的祖先的后裔演变过程逐步进化而来的,而创造模式则认为上帝按照自己的形象直接创造了人类。当然,这两种模式对人类尊严的影响对人类的生存都非常重要。上帝是直接创造了人类,还是通过从类人猿祖先进化而来,这都关系到人类的尊严。例如,它提出了一个问题:人类的形象是谁的?是上帝的形象还是猿猴的形象?对这一问题的回答必然会影响人与神以及人与人之间的关系。本研究采用文学研究方法,从书籍、文章和论文中收集资料。对这些资料进行了批判性研究,以考虑辩论双方的论点。研究发现,《圣经》和科学数据都允许特定物种内部的变异(微观进化),但不允许一个物种从另一个物种产生(宏观进化)。研究结果表明,必须接受创世模式及其对人类尊严的影响:进化 创造 人类尊严 起源
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信