{"title":"European Portuguese lá: Use-Conditional Meaning and Pragmaticalization","authors":"Lukas Müller","doi":"10.3390/languages9060189","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study focusses on non-adverbial uses of lá in European Portuguese, whose exact meaning contribution still remains an open research question. Applying a multidimensional semantics framework, the central claim is that non-adverbial uses of lá represent use-conditional items. Passing the standard tests suggested in the literature, they thus do not contribute to the truth conditions of an utterance but specify particular use conditions. It is argued that they are felicitously used if a speaker wants to convey illocutionary modification, which pragmatically leads to mitigation or reinforcement effects. Diachronically, substantiated by historical data from the Corpus do Português, use-conditional lá is argued to be a product of a pragmaticalization process that led to so-called pragmatic fission at some point, i.e., to the polysemy of two synchronically available configurations of a truth-conditional and a use-conditional lá.","PeriodicalId":510372,"journal":{"name":"Languages","volume":"11 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Languages","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/languages9060189","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study focusses on non-adverbial uses of lá in European Portuguese, whose exact meaning contribution still remains an open research question. Applying a multidimensional semantics framework, the central claim is that non-adverbial uses of lá represent use-conditional items. Passing the standard tests suggested in the literature, they thus do not contribute to the truth conditions of an utterance but specify particular use conditions. It is argued that they are felicitously used if a speaker wants to convey illocutionary modification, which pragmatically leads to mitigation or reinforcement effects. Diachronically, substantiated by historical data from the Corpus do Português, use-conditional lá is argued to be a product of a pragmaticalization process that led to so-called pragmatic fission at some point, i.e., to the polysemy of two synchronically available configurations of a truth-conditional and a use-conditional lá.
本研究的重点是欧洲葡萄牙语中 lá 的非谓语用法,其确切的意义贡献仍是一个未决的研究问题。运用多维语义学框架,研究的核心主张是,lá 的非谚语用法代表了使用条件项。因此,通过文献中提出的标准测试,它们对语句的真义条件没有贡献,但指定了特定的使用条件。有学者认为,如果说话人想传达虚词修饰的意思,它们就会被恰当地使用,这在语用上会产生缓解或强化的效果。根据葡萄牙语语料库(Corpus do Português)中的历史数据,使用条件lá被认为是语用化过程的产物,这一过程在某一时刻导致了所谓的语用裂变,即出现了真假条件lá和使用条件lá两种同步配置的多义性。