Predictions from Generative Artificial Intelligence Models: Towards a New Benchmark in Forecasting Practice

Information Pub Date : 2024-05-21 DOI:10.3390/info15060291
Hossein Hassani, E. Silva
{"title":"Predictions from Generative Artificial Intelligence Models: Towards a New Benchmark in Forecasting Practice","authors":"Hossein Hassani, E. Silva","doi":"10.3390/info15060291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper aims to determine whether there is a case for promoting a new benchmark for forecasting practice via the innovative application of generative artificial intelligence (Gen-AI) for predicting the future. Today, forecasts can be generated via Gen-AI models without the need for an in-depth understanding of forecasting theory, practice, or coding. Therefore, using three datasets, we present a comparative analysis of forecasts from Gen-AI models against forecasts from seven univariate and automated models from the forecast package in R, covering both parametric and non-parametric forecasting techniques. In some cases, we find statistically significant evidence to conclude that forecasts from Gen-AI models can outperform forecasts from popular benchmarks like seasonal ARIMA, seasonal naïve, exponential smoothing, and Theta forecasts (to name a few). Our findings also indicate that the accuracy of forecasts from Gen-AI models can vary not only based on the underlying data structure but also on the quality of prompt engineering (thus highlighting the continued importance of forecasting education), with the forecast accuracy appearing to improve at longer horizons. Therefore, we find some evidence towards promoting forecasts from Gen-AI models as benchmarks in future forecasting practice. However, at present, users are cautioned against reliability issues and Gen-AI being a black box in some cases.","PeriodicalId":510156,"journal":{"name":"Information","volume":"45 22","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/info15060291","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper aims to determine whether there is a case for promoting a new benchmark for forecasting practice via the innovative application of generative artificial intelligence (Gen-AI) for predicting the future. Today, forecasts can be generated via Gen-AI models without the need for an in-depth understanding of forecasting theory, practice, or coding. Therefore, using three datasets, we present a comparative analysis of forecasts from Gen-AI models against forecasts from seven univariate and automated models from the forecast package in R, covering both parametric and non-parametric forecasting techniques. In some cases, we find statistically significant evidence to conclude that forecasts from Gen-AI models can outperform forecasts from popular benchmarks like seasonal ARIMA, seasonal naïve, exponential smoothing, and Theta forecasts (to name a few). Our findings also indicate that the accuracy of forecasts from Gen-AI models can vary not only based on the underlying data structure but also on the quality of prompt engineering (thus highlighting the continued importance of forecasting education), with the forecast accuracy appearing to improve at longer horizons. Therefore, we find some evidence towards promoting forecasts from Gen-AI models as benchmarks in future forecasting practice. However, at present, users are cautioned against reliability issues and Gen-AI being a black box in some cases.
生成式人工智能模型的预测:迈向预测实践的新基准
本文旨在确定是否有理由通过创新应用生成式人工智能(Gen-AI)来预测未来,从而促进预测实践的新基准。如今,预测可以通过 Gen-AI 模型生成,无需深入了解预测理论、实践或编码。因此,我们利用三个数据集,将 Gen-AI 模型的预测结果与 R 预测软件包中七个单变量模型和自动模型的预测结果进行了比较分析,其中涵盖了参数和非参数预测技术。在某些情况下,我们发现了具有统计学意义的证据,从而得出结论:Gen-AI 模型的预测结果优于季节性 ARIMA、季节性天真、指数平滑和 Theta 预测(仅举几例)等流行基准的预测结果。我们的研究结果还表明,Gen-AI 模型预测的准确性不仅取决于基础数据结构,还取决于及时工程的质量(因此凸显了预测教育的持续重要性),预测准确性似乎在更长的时间跨度上有所提高。因此,我们发现一些证据表明,在未来的预测实践中,应将 Gen-AI 模型的预测作为基准加以推广。不过,目前我们提醒用户注意可靠性问题以及 Gen-AI 在某些情况下是一个黑盒子的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信