Management of Acute Coronary Syndromes requiring coronary angiography in patients with Drug Reaction with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms (DRESS) syndrome induced by iodinated contrast media: two case reports and narrative review
Carola Griffith Brookles, Matteo Bianco, Stefano Pizzimenti, Giulia Gobello, C. Biolè, P. Destefanis, Enrico Cerrato, Alessandra Chinaglia
{"title":"Management of Acute Coronary Syndromes requiring coronary angiography in patients with Drug Reaction with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms (DRESS) syndrome induced by iodinated contrast media: two case reports and narrative review","authors":"Carola Griffith Brookles, Matteo Bianco, Stefano Pizzimenti, Giulia Gobello, C. Biolè, P. Destefanis, Enrico Cerrato, Alessandra Chinaglia","doi":"10.1093/ehjcr/ytae259","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n hypersensitivity reactions to iodinated contrast media (ICM) are frequently encountered in clinical practice. Severe manifestations, despite being infrequent, can be life-threatening and represent an issue when re-administration of ICM is required. Clear recommendations on prevention and management of relapses are still lacking.\n \n \n \n we present the cases of two patients presenting with Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) requiring urgent coronary angiography, with an anamnesis of ICM-induced Drug Reaction with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms (DRESS) syndrome. Both patients safely underwent a coronary angiography with the use of a different ICM (Iobitridol) to the one linked to hypersensitivity manifestations, after premedication with corticosteroids and H1 antagonists.\n \n \n \n Our experience highlights that in clinical situations in which the use of ICM is urgently needed, premedication with corticosteroids and H1 antagonists together with the choice of an alternative contrast agent (when the culprit is known) represent an effective strategy to perform a potentially life-saving procedure while avoiding serious systemic allergic reactions.\n","PeriodicalId":507701,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal - Case Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Heart Journal - Case Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjcr/ytae259","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
hypersensitivity reactions to iodinated contrast media (ICM) are frequently encountered in clinical practice. Severe manifestations, despite being infrequent, can be life-threatening and represent an issue when re-administration of ICM is required. Clear recommendations on prevention and management of relapses are still lacking.
we present the cases of two patients presenting with Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) requiring urgent coronary angiography, with an anamnesis of ICM-induced Drug Reaction with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms (DRESS) syndrome. Both patients safely underwent a coronary angiography with the use of a different ICM (Iobitridol) to the one linked to hypersensitivity manifestations, after premedication with corticosteroids and H1 antagonists.
Our experience highlights that in clinical situations in which the use of ICM is urgently needed, premedication with corticosteroids and H1 antagonists together with the choice of an alternative contrast agent (when the culprit is known) represent an effective strategy to perform a potentially life-saving procedure while avoiding serious systemic allergic reactions.