Adapting the World Health Organization’s Surgical Safety Checklist to High-Income Settings: A Hybrid Effectiveness-Implementation Trial Protocol

Nathan Turley, Karolina Kogut, Barbara Burian, Rachel Moyal-Smith, James Etheridge, Yves Sonnay, William Berry, Alan Merry, Alexander Hannenberg, Alex B. Haynes, Roger D. Dias, Kathryn Hagen, George Molina, Lisa Spruce, Carla Williams, Mary E. Brindle
{"title":"Adapting the World Health Organization’s Surgical Safety Checklist to High-Income Settings: A Hybrid Effectiveness-Implementation Trial Protocol","authors":"Nathan Turley, Karolina Kogut, Barbara Burian, Rachel Moyal-Smith, James Etheridge, Yves Sonnay, William Berry, Alan Merry, Alexander Hannenberg, Alex B. Haynes, Roger D. Dias, Kathryn Hagen, George Molina, Lisa Spruce, Carla Williams, Mary E. Brindle","doi":"10.1097/as9.0000000000000436","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n The proposed study aims to assess users’ perceptions of a surgical safety checklist (SSC) reimplementation toolkit and its impact on SSC attitudes and operating room (OR) culture, meaningful checklist use, measures of surgical safety, and OR efficiency at 3 different hospital sites.\n \n \n \n The High-Performance Checklist toolkit (toolkit) assists surgical teams in modifying and implementing or reimplementing the World Health Organization’s SSC. Through the explore, prepare, implement, and sustain implementation framework, the toolkit provides a process and set of tools to facilitate surgical teams’ modification, implementation, training on, and evaluation of the SSC.\n \n \n \n A pre–post intervention design will be used to assess the impact of the modified SSC on surgical processes, team culture, patient experience, and safety. This mixed-methods study includes quantitative and qualitative data derived from surveys, semi-structured interviews, patient focus groups, and SSC performance observations. Additionally, patient outcome and OR efficiency data will be collected from the study sites’ health surveillance systems.\n \n \n \n Statistical data will be analyzed using Statistical Product and Service Solutions, while qualitative data will be analyzed thematically using NVivo. Furthermore, interview data will be analyzed using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research and reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, maintenance implementation frameworks.\n \n \n \n The toolkit will be introduced at 3 diverse surgical sites in Alberta, Canada: an urban hospital, university hospital, and small regional hospital.\n \n \n \n We anticipate the results of this study will optimize SSC usage at the participating surgical sites, help shape and refine the toolkit, and improve its usability and application at future sites.\n","PeriodicalId":503165,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Surgery Open","volume":"8 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Surgery Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/as9.0000000000000436","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The proposed study aims to assess users’ perceptions of a surgical safety checklist (SSC) reimplementation toolkit and its impact on SSC attitudes and operating room (OR) culture, meaningful checklist use, measures of surgical safety, and OR efficiency at 3 different hospital sites. The High-Performance Checklist toolkit (toolkit) assists surgical teams in modifying and implementing or reimplementing the World Health Organization’s SSC. Through the explore, prepare, implement, and sustain implementation framework, the toolkit provides a process and set of tools to facilitate surgical teams’ modification, implementation, training on, and evaluation of the SSC. A pre–post intervention design will be used to assess the impact of the modified SSC on surgical processes, team culture, patient experience, and safety. This mixed-methods study includes quantitative and qualitative data derived from surveys, semi-structured interviews, patient focus groups, and SSC performance observations. Additionally, patient outcome and OR efficiency data will be collected from the study sites’ health surveillance systems. Statistical data will be analyzed using Statistical Product and Service Solutions, while qualitative data will be analyzed thematically using NVivo. Furthermore, interview data will be analyzed using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research and reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, maintenance implementation frameworks. The toolkit will be introduced at 3 diverse surgical sites in Alberta, Canada: an urban hospital, university hospital, and small regional hospital. We anticipate the results of this study will optimize SSC usage at the participating surgical sites, help shape and refine the toolkit, and improve its usability and application at future sites.
将世界卫生组织的手术安全检查表应用于高收入地区:效果-实施混合试验方案
本研究旨在评估用户对手术安全核对表(SSC)重新实施工具包的看法,以及该工具包对三家不同医院的 SSC 态度和手术室(OR)文化、有意义的核对表使用、手术安全措施和手术室效率的影响。 高性能核对表工具包(工具包)可帮助手术团队修改、实施或重新实施世界卫生组织的 SSC。通过探索、准备、实施和持续实施框架,该工具包提供了一套流程和工具,以促进外科团队对 SSC 的修改、实施、培训和评估。 将采用前后干预设计来评估修改后的 SSC 对手术流程、团队文化、患者体验和安全性的影响。这项混合方法研究包括来自调查、半结构化访谈、患者焦点小组和 SSC 性能观察的定量和定性数据。此外,还将从研究机构的健康监测系统中收集患者疗效和手术室效率数据。 统计数据将使用统计产品和服务解决方案进行分析,定性数据将使用 NVivo 进行专题分析。此外,还将使用 "实施研究综合框架 "和 "覆盖范围"、"有效性"、"采用"、"实施"、"维护 "等实施框架对访谈数据进行分析。 该工具包将在加拿大艾伯塔省的 3 个不同手术场所推出:城市医院、大学医院和小型地区医院。 我们预计,这项研究的结果将优化参与研究的外科医院对 SSC 的使用,帮助塑造和完善工具包,并提高其可用性和在未来医院的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信