THE IMPACT OF THE MATRIMONIAL PROPERTY REGIME ON COMMERCIAL COMPANIES ACCORDING TO ALBANIAN LEGISLATION

{"title":"THE IMPACT OF THE MATRIMONIAL PROPERTY REGIME ON COMMERCIAL COMPANIES ACCORDING TO ALBANIAN LEGISLATION","authors":"","doi":"10.33327/ajee-18-7.3-a000305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: \nThe purpose of this study is to examine the interaction between the legal\ndiscipline of matrimonial property regimes and the commercial activities of spouses that are\nestablished before or during marriage. It aims to investigate how the legal community impacts\ncommercial companies, specifically in the hypothesis where the shareholder of the company is\nmarried. There is ongoing debate within legal circles about whether shares of a commercial\ncompany established by one spouse during marriage or acquired through a legal transaction\nare part of the legal community. Regarding this matter, several issues arise: whether the\nparticipation in the company's initial capital is governed by community administration rules,\nwhich is the legal nature of shares acquired by one spouse, and how the marital community\nregime interplays with commercial legislation. Another issue that has engaged legal doctrine is\nwhether the spouse of a shareholder is recognised as a shareholder and can participate in the\ncompany administration. Albanian Family Code lacks specificity on shares, mainly addressing\nsmall family businesses. The study of the interaction of these two disciplines aims to assist\njurisprudence because, despite some cases of the Supreme Court and the Constitutional Court\nin recent years, this is still a relatively new field for Albanian doctrine and jurisprudence.\n\nMethods:\nThe research methodology adopted for this paper employs a multi-faceted approach,\nintegrating desk research, legal analysis, case law review, and a comparative study. It\nencompasses an examination of relevant national legislation, as well as foreign legislation from\ncivil law tradition countries such as France and Italy. Furthermore, European soft law, notably\nthe principles of the European Commission of Family Law (CEFL) focusing on matrimonial\nproperty issues, has been reviewed.\nOur research methodology includes gathering and analysing existing studies and academic\nliterature on matrimonial property regimes. To better understand the norms of the Family\nCode regarding matrimonial property regimes, we will analyse Italian and French doctrine\nand jurisprudence, as well as the legal systems based on which the Albanian Family Code\nhas been drafted.\nIt should be emphasised that while this paper’s primary aim is not solely comparative analysis,\nit strives to assist in better understanding and implementation of the legal community regime\nas the most used regime by spouses in practice. Also, a comprehensive comparative analysis\nhas been conducted, comparing Albanian legislation and the CEFL Principles, to identify key\nsimilarities, differences, and potential areas for enhancement within legal frameworks.\nMoreover, the jurisprudence of both Albanian and foreign High courts has been extensively\nutilised to enrich the analysis and provide insights into practical applications of legal principles.\n\nResults and Conclusions:\nThe solution to the abovementioned issues depends on the company’s\nlegal structure and articles of participation rules and requires a combined interpretation of\nmatrimonial property regimes and commercial law. In this combined interpretation of the\nrules, protecting the rights and interests of all involved subjects, the interests of the spouses and\nthose of the commercial company as a legal entity is crucial.","PeriodicalId":502146,"journal":{"name":"Access to Justice in Eastern Europe","volume":"64 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Access to Justice in Eastern Europe","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33327/ajee-18-7.3-a000305","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study is to examine the interaction between the legal discipline of matrimonial property regimes and the commercial activities of spouses that are established before or during marriage. It aims to investigate how the legal community impacts commercial companies, specifically in the hypothesis where the shareholder of the company is married. There is ongoing debate within legal circles about whether shares of a commercial company established by one spouse during marriage or acquired through a legal transaction are part of the legal community. Regarding this matter, several issues arise: whether the participation in the company's initial capital is governed by community administration rules, which is the legal nature of shares acquired by one spouse, and how the marital community regime interplays with commercial legislation. Another issue that has engaged legal doctrine is whether the spouse of a shareholder is recognised as a shareholder and can participate in the company administration. Albanian Family Code lacks specificity on shares, mainly addressing small family businesses. The study of the interaction of these two disciplines aims to assist jurisprudence because, despite some cases of the Supreme Court and the Constitutional Court in recent years, this is still a relatively new field for Albanian doctrine and jurisprudence. Methods: The research methodology adopted for this paper employs a multi-faceted approach, integrating desk research, legal analysis, case law review, and a comparative study. It encompasses an examination of relevant national legislation, as well as foreign legislation from civil law tradition countries such as France and Italy. Furthermore, European soft law, notably the principles of the European Commission of Family Law (CEFL) focusing on matrimonial property issues, has been reviewed. Our research methodology includes gathering and analysing existing studies and academic literature on matrimonial property regimes. To better understand the norms of the Family Code regarding matrimonial property regimes, we will analyse Italian and French doctrine and jurisprudence, as well as the legal systems based on which the Albanian Family Code has been drafted. It should be emphasised that while this paper’s primary aim is not solely comparative analysis, it strives to assist in better understanding and implementation of the legal community regime as the most used regime by spouses in practice. Also, a comprehensive comparative analysis has been conducted, comparing Albanian legislation and the CEFL Principles, to identify key similarities, differences, and potential areas for enhancement within legal frameworks. Moreover, the jurisprudence of both Albanian and foreign High courts has been extensively utilised to enrich the analysis and provide insights into practical applications of legal principles. Results and Conclusions: The solution to the abovementioned issues depends on the company’s legal structure and articles of participation rules and requires a combined interpretation of matrimonial property regimes and commercial law. In this combined interpretation of the rules, protecting the rights and interests of all involved subjects, the interests of the spouses and those of the commercial company as a legal entity is crucial.
根据阿尔巴尼亚法律,婚姻财产制度对商业公司的影响
背景:本研究旨在探讨婚姻财产制度的法律约束与婚前或婚姻存续期间建立的配偶商业活动之间的相互作用。它旨在研究法律界如何影响商业公司,特别是在公司股东已婚的假设情况下。法律界一直在争论夫妻一方在婚姻存续期间成立的商业公司的股份或通过合法交易获得的股份是否属于法律共同体的一部分。关于这个问题,出现了几个问题:参与公司初始资本是否受共同管理规则的管辖,配偶一方获得的股份的法律性质是什么,以及婚姻共同制度如何与商业立法相互作用。另一个涉及法律理论的问题是股东的配偶是否被承认为股东并可以参与公司管理。阿尔巴尼亚家庭法》缺乏关于股份的具体规定,主要针对小型家族企业。研究这两门学科之间的互动关系旨在为法理学提供帮助,因为尽管最高法院和宪法法院近年来审理了一些案件,但对于阿尔巴尼亚的理论和法理学而言,这仍然是一个相对较新的领域。方法:本文采用的研究方法是一种多方面的方法,综合了案头研究、法律分析、判例法审查和比较研究。它包括对相关国家立法以及民法传统国家(如法国和意大利)的外国立法的研究。我们的研究方法包括收集和分析有关婚姻财产制度的现有研究和学术文献。为了更好地理解《家庭法典》中有关婚姻财产制度的规范,我们将分析意大利和法国的理论和判例,以及阿尔巴尼亚《家庭法典》起草时所依据的法律制度。需要强调的是,本文的主要目的并非单纯的比较分析,而是致力于帮助更好地理解和实施夫妻双方在实践中最常使用的法定共同财产制度。此外,本文还对阿尔巴尼亚立法和《CEFL 原则》进行了全面的比较分析,以确定法律框架内的主要相似点、不同点和可能需要改进的地方。此外,本文还广泛利用了阿尔巴尼亚和外国高等法院的判例,以丰富分析内容,并为法律原则的实际应用提供见解。在对这些规则进行综合解释时,保护所有参与主体的权益、配偶的权益以及作为法律实体的商业公司的权益至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信