Redeployment in language contact: the case of phonological emphasis

Darin Flynn
{"title":"Redeployment in language contact: the case of phonological emphasis","authors":"Darin Flynn","doi":"10.3389/flang.2024.1325597","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article applies the notion of redeployment in second language acquisition to contact-induced diachronic changes. Of special interest are cases where a marked phonological contrast has spread across neighboring languages. Such cases suggest that listeners can re-weight and re-map phonetic cues onto novel phonological structures. On the redeployment view, cues can indeed be re-weighted, but phonological structures which underlie a new contrast are not expected to be fully novel; rather, they must be assembled from preexisting phonological structures. Emphatics are an instructive case. These are (mostly) coronal consonants articulated with tongue-root retraction. Phonological emphasis is rare among the world's languages but it is famously endogenous in Arabic and in Interior Salish and it has spread from these to not a few neighboring languages. The present study describes and analyzes the genesis of phonological emphasis and its exogenous spread to a dozen mostly unrelated languages—from Arabic to Iranian and Caucasian languages, among others, and from Interior Salish to Athabaskan and Wakashan languages. This research shows that most languages acquire emphatics by redeploying the phonological feature [RTR] (retracted tongue root) from preexisting uvulars. On the other hand, some languages acquire imitations of emphatics by redeploying the consonantal use of [low] from preexisting pharyngeals. Phonological emphasis is apparently not borrowed by neighboring languages where consonants lack a phonological feature fit for redeployment. The overall impression is that a language in contact with emphatics may newly adopt these sounds as [RTR] or [low] only if the relevant feature is already in use in its consonant system. This pattern of adoption in language contact supports the redeployment construct in second language acquisition theory.","PeriodicalId":350337,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Language Sciences","volume":"62 22","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Language Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/flang.2024.1325597","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article applies the notion of redeployment in second language acquisition to contact-induced diachronic changes. Of special interest are cases where a marked phonological contrast has spread across neighboring languages. Such cases suggest that listeners can re-weight and re-map phonetic cues onto novel phonological structures. On the redeployment view, cues can indeed be re-weighted, but phonological structures which underlie a new contrast are not expected to be fully novel; rather, they must be assembled from preexisting phonological structures. Emphatics are an instructive case. These are (mostly) coronal consonants articulated with tongue-root retraction. Phonological emphasis is rare among the world's languages but it is famously endogenous in Arabic and in Interior Salish and it has spread from these to not a few neighboring languages. The present study describes and analyzes the genesis of phonological emphasis and its exogenous spread to a dozen mostly unrelated languages—from Arabic to Iranian and Caucasian languages, among others, and from Interior Salish to Athabaskan and Wakashan languages. This research shows that most languages acquire emphatics by redeploying the phonological feature [RTR] (retracted tongue root) from preexisting uvulars. On the other hand, some languages acquire imitations of emphatics by redeploying the consonantal use of [low] from preexisting pharyngeals. Phonological emphasis is apparently not borrowed by neighboring languages where consonants lack a phonological feature fit for redeployment. The overall impression is that a language in contact with emphatics may newly adopt these sounds as [RTR] or [low] only if the relevant feature is already in use in its consonant system. This pattern of adoption in language contact supports the redeployment construct in second language acquisition theory.
语言接触中的重新部署:语音强调的案例
本文将第二语言习得中的重新部署概念应用于接触引起的异时变化。特别值得关注的是,在邻近语言中,明显的语音对比已经传播开来。这种情况表明,听者可以将语音线索重新加权并重新映射到新的语音结构上。根据重新部署的观点,语音线索的确可以重新加权,但作为新对比的基础的语音结构并不是完全新颖的;相反,它们必须是由先前存在的语音结构组合而成的。表音法是一个具有启发性的案例。这些辅音(大部分)是用舌根后缩发音的冠辅音。语音重音在世界语言中很少见,但在阿拉伯语和内部萨利什语中却是著名的内源性重音,而且还从这些语言传播到了不在少数的邻近语言中。本研究描述并分析了语音重读的起源及其在十几种大多不相关的语言中的外源性传播--从阿拉伯语到伊朗语和高加索语等,从内萨利什语到阿萨贝斯坎语和瓦卡山语。这项研究表明,大多数语言都是通过重新部署原有上声部的语音特征 [RTR](缩舌根)来获得表音的。另一方面,有些语言通过从已有的咽音中重新部署辅音[low]来获得模仿的重音。在辅音缺乏适合重新部署的语音特征的情况下,邻近语言显然不会借用语音强调。总的印象是,与强调音接触的语言只有在其辅音系统中已经使用了相关特征的情况下,才会新采用这些音作为[RTR]或[low]。这种语言接触中的采用模式支持第二语言习得理论中的重新部署建构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信