How do Educational Staff and Students in a Medical School Perceive Social Accountability? A Multi-Perspective Qualitative Interview Study

IF 0.9 Q3 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Janique Oudbier, T. Boerboom, Saskia Peerdeman, Jeanine Suurmond
{"title":"How do Educational Staff and Students in a Medical School Perceive Social Accountability? A Multi-Perspective Qualitative Interview Study","authors":"Janique Oudbier, T. Boerboom, Saskia Peerdeman, Jeanine Suurmond","doi":"10.62694/efh.2024.20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The majority of medical education is currently biomedical, while the concept of social accountability is not always systematically integrated. Education on social accountability equips students with the knowledge and skills to be socially accountable health professionals. However, the existing definitions of social accountability are not consistently applied, and the perspectives of important stakeholders are lacking. This study explores the perceptions of medical students and educational staff members on the construct of social accountability. Methods: This study uses an exploratory qualitative design in which online semi-structured interviews were conducted with 28 educational staff members and 16 students at a medical school in the Netherlands. Participants were recruited using purposeful sampling and snowballing techniques. The interviews were qualitatively analyzed according to the grounded theory approach. Results and Conclusion: Amongst the participants, there was unfamiliarity with the term, social accountability. Participants mentioned the impact on society, institutional responsibility, and context-dependency as all features of social accountability. In line with previous studies, participants identified community-based learning and working, patient-centeredness, and diversity as sub-aspects of social accountability. Further aspects identified by the participants are sustainability, moral issues, and interprofessional collaboration. This study provided more insight into the construct of social accountability from the perspectives educational staff and students at a medical school.","PeriodicalId":46742,"journal":{"name":"Education for Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education for Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62694/efh.2024.20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The majority of medical education is currently biomedical, while the concept of social accountability is not always systematically integrated. Education on social accountability equips students with the knowledge and skills to be socially accountable health professionals. However, the existing definitions of social accountability are not consistently applied, and the perspectives of important stakeholders are lacking. This study explores the perceptions of medical students and educational staff members on the construct of social accountability. Methods: This study uses an exploratory qualitative design in which online semi-structured interviews were conducted with 28 educational staff members and 16 students at a medical school in the Netherlands. Participants were recruited using purposeful sampling and snowballing techniques. The interviews were qualitatively analyzed according to the grounded theory approach. Results and Conclusion: Amongst the participants, there was unfamiliarity with the term, social accountability. Participants mentioned the impact on society, institutional responsibility, and context-dependency as all features of social accountability. In line with previous studies, participants identified community-based learning and working, patient-centeredness, and diversity as sub-aspects of social accountability. Further aspects identified by the participants are sustainability, moral issues, and interprofessional collaboration. This study provided more insight into the construct of social accountability from the perspectives educational staff and students at a medical school.
医学院的师生如何看待社会责任?多视角定性访谈研究
背景:目前,大多数医学教育都是生物医学教育,而社会责任的概念并不总是系统地融入其中。社会责任教育为学生提供知识和技能,使其成为对社会负责的医疗专业人员。然而,现有的社会责任感定义并没有得到一致的应用,也缺乏重要利益相关者的观点。本研究探讨了医学生和教育工作者对社会责任感这一概念的看法。方法:本研究采用探索性定性设计,对荷兰一所医学院的 28 名教职员工和 16 名学生进行了在线半结构式访谈。采用有目的的抽样和滚雪球技术招募参与者。根据基础理论方法对访谈进行了定性分析。结果与结论:参与者对 "社会责任 "一词并不熟悉。与会者提到,对社会的影响、机构责任和环境依赖性都是社会责任的特征。与以往的研究相一致,与会者认为以社区为基础的学习和工作、以病人为中心和 多样性是社会责任的子方面。与会者还指出了可持续性、道德问题和跨专业合作等方面。这项研究从一所医学院的教育工作者和学生的角度,对社会责任感的构建提出了更多的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Education for Health
Education for Health EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
期刊介绍: Education for Health: Change in Learning and Practice (EfH) is the scholarly, peer-reviewed journal of The Network: Towards Unity for Health. Our readers are health professionals, health professions educators and learners, health care researchers, policymakers, community leaders and administrators from all over the world. We publish original studies, reviews, think pieces, works in progress and commentaries on current trends, issues, and controversies. We especially want to provide our international readers with fresh ideas and innovative models of education and health services that can enable them to be maximally responsive to the healthcare needs of the communities in which they work and learn.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信