Cultural mobilities and cultural heritage: concepts for an Asia-centric approach

Karen O’Brien-Kop, Xiang Ren, Alessandro Rippa
{"title":"Cultural mobilities and cultural heritage: concepts for an Asia-centric approach","authors":"Karen O’Brien-Kop, Xiang Ren, Alessandro Rippa","doi":"10.5871/jba/012.a12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThis article sets out an original and exploratory framework for examining emerging concepts of cultural mobilities and heritage with a key focus on the infrastructure and spatialities of cultural mobilities in, of and through Asia—specifically China. To date, the scholarly analysis of mobilities has been dominated by the social sciences in relation to central themes of migration, national borders, crisis and transnational flows of objects and people. This paper seeks to expand the focus in mobilities discourses to humanities, not only to research how infrastructures and spatialities are shaped by culture and heritage but also to analyse cultural mobility through infrastructure and spatialities. We set out epistemic considerations for approaching cultural mobilities through an interdisciplinary lens that seeks to address heritage studies of diverse kinds, from environmental to religious to architectural. By centring Asian epistemes, the paper also challenges recognition and interpretation biases in the humanities and social sciences that continue to privilege Eurocentric hegemonies. Together, the co-authors examine: how Asian cultures operate through material and non-material infrastructures that defy singular location in geopolitical crossings and networks; how culture is mobilised in different ways through infrastructure; the entanglement of cultural heritage with political infrastructure and living practice as well as embedded values. The article discusses China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), yoga as a cultural infrastructure between India and China, and the infrastructure and multiple spatialities of Chinatown as a evolving practice of cultural heritage.\n","PeriodicalId":93790,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the British Academy","volume":"20 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the British Academy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5871/jba/012.a12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article sets out an original and exploratory framework for examining emerging concepts of cultural mobilities and heritage with a key focus on the infrastructure and spatialities of cultural mobilities in, of and through Asia—specifically China. To date, the scholarly analysis of mobilities has been dominated by the social sciences in relation to central themes of migration, national borders, crisis and transnational flows of objects and people. This paper seeks to expand the focus in mobilities discourses to humanities, not only to research how infrastructures and spatialities are shaped by culture and heritage but also to analyse cultural mobility through infrastructure and spatialities. We set out epistemic considerations for approaching cultural mobilities through an interdisciplinary lens that seeks to address heritage studies of diverse kinds, from environmental to religious to architectural. By centring Asian epistemes, the paper also challenges recognition and interpretation biases in the humanities and social sciences that continue to privilege Eurocentric hegemonies. Together, the co-authors examine: how Asian cultures operate through material and non-material infrastructures that defy singular location in geopolitical crossings and networks; how culture is mobilised in different ways through infrastructure; the entanglement of cultural heritage with political infrastructure and living practice as well as embedded values. The article discusses China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), yoga as a cultural infrastructure between India and China, and the infrastructure and multiple spatialities of Chinatown as a evolving practice of cultural heritage.
文化流动性与文化遗产:以亚洲为中心的方法概念
本文提出了一个新颖的探索性框架,用于研究文化流动性和遗产的新兴概念,重点关注亚洲(尤其是中国)、亚洲和通过亚洲的文化流动性的基础设施和空间性。迄今为止,学术界对流动性的分析主要集中在社会科学领域,涉及移民、国界、危机以及物品和人员的跨国流动等核心主题。本文试图将流动性论述的重点扩展到人文学科,不仅研究基础设施和空间性是如何由文化和遗产塑造的,而且通过基础设施和空间性分析文化流动性。我们从跨学科的视角出发,提出了处理文化流动性的认识论考量,力求解决从环境、宗教到建筑等不同类型的遗产研究问题。通过以亚洲的认识论为中心,本文还挑战了人文和社会科学中的认识和解释偏见,因为这些偏见仍然是欧洲中心霸权的特权。两位合著者共同探讨了:亚洲文化如何通过物质和非物质基础设施运作,而这些基础设施又如何在地缘政治交叉点和网络中占据独特位置;文化如何通过基础设施以不同方式被调动起来;文化遗产与政治基础设施、生活实践以及内含价值观之间的纠葛。文章讨论了中国的 "一带一路 "倡议(BRI)、瑜伽作为中印之间的文化基础设施,以及唐人街作为不断发展的文化遗产实践的基础设施和多重空间性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信