Intermediate ions as indicator for local new particle formation

Santeri Tuovinen, J. Lampilahti, V. Kerminen, M. Kulmala
{"title":"Intermediate ions as indicator for local new particle formation","authors":"Santeri Tuovinen, J. Lampilahti, V. Kerminen, M. Kulmala","doi":"10.5194/ar-2-93-2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. Atmospheric aerosol particles have a considerable influence on climate via both aerosol–radiation and aerosol–cloud interactions. A major fraction of global aerosol particles, in terms of their number concentration, is due to atmospheric new particle formation (NPF) that involves both neutral and charged clusters and particles. NPF is the major source of atmospheric intermediate ions, i.e., charged particles with mobility diameters between approx. 2 and 7 nm. We investigate ion concentrations between 1.7 and 3.1 nm at the SMEAR II (Station for Measuring Forest Ecosystem–Atmosphere Relations II) measurement station in Hyytiälä, Finland. Both negative and positive ion number size distributions measured by a Neutral cluster and Air Ion Spectrometer (NAIS) are used. Our aim is to find the best diameter size range of ions for identifying and evaluating the intensity of local intermediate ion formation (LIIF). Intermediate ion formation (IIF) refers to the formation of intermediate ions through NPF, while local means that the growth of such ions from smaller clusters has occurred in close proximity (e.g., within 500 m to 1 km) to the measurement site, i.e., locally. We find that the ions in the mobility diameter size range of 2.0–2.3 nm are the best suited for detection of LIIF. The ion concentrations in this size range indicate the elevated rates of IIF, and the potential distances the growing ions have traveled are smaller than those for larger ions. In addition, in Hyytiälä, the negative ion concentrations are more sensitive to IIF than the positive ion concentrations due to the higher difference in concentrations between periods of IIF and the background. Therefore, we recommend the concentrations of ions with diameters 2.0–2.3 nm as the best choice for identifying and evaluating the intensity of LIIF.\n","PeriodicalId":511317,"journal":{"name":"Aerosol Research","volume":"31 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aerosol Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/ar-2-93-2024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract. Atmospheric aerosol particles have a considerable influence on climate via both aerosol–radiation and aerosol–cloud interactions. A major fraction of global aerosol particles, in terms of their number concentration, is due to atmospheric new particle formation (NPF) that involves both neutral and charged clusters and particles. NPF is the major source of atmospheric intermediate ions, i.e., charged particles with mobility diameters between approx. 2 and 7 nm. We investigate ion concentrations between 1.7 and 3.1 nm at the SMEAR II (Station for Measuring Forest Ecosystem–Atmosphere Relations II) measurement station in Hyytiälä, Finland. Both negative and positive ion number size distributions measured by a Neutral cluster and Air Ion Spectrometer (NAIS) are used. Our aim is to find the best diameter size range of ions for identifying and evaluating the intensity of local intermediate ion formation (LIIF). Intermediate ion formation (IIF) refers to the formation of intermediate ions through NPF, while local means that the growth of such ions from smaller clusters has occurred in close proximity (e.g., within 500 m to 1 km) to the measurement site, i.e., locally. We find that the ions in the mobility diameter size range of 2.0–2.3 nm are the best suited for detection of LIIF. The ion concentrations in this size range indicate the elevated rates of IIF, and the potential distances the growing ions have traveled are smaller than those for larger ions. In addition, in Hyytiälä, the negative ion concentrations are more sensitive to IIF than the positive ion concentrations due to the higher difference in concentrations between periods of IIF and the background. Therefore, we recommend the concentrations of ions with diameters 2.0–2.3 nm as the best choice for identifying and evaluating the intensity of LIIF.
中间离子作为局部新粒子形成的指标
摘要。大气气溶胶粒子通过气溶胶-辐射和气溶胶-云的相互作用对气候产生相当大的影响。就数量浓度而言,全球气溶胶粒子的一大部分是由大气新粒子形成(NPF)造成的,其中既有中性粒子团,也有带电粒子团和粒子。NPF 是大气中间离子的主要来源,即移动直径在 2 纳米到 7 纳米之间的带电粒子。我们在芬兰 Hyytiälä 的 SMEAR II(森林生态系统与大气关系测量站 II)测量站调查了 1.7 至 3.1 纳米之间的离子浓度。使用中性簇和空气离子光谱仪(NAIS)测量的负离子和正离子数量大小分布。我们的目标是找到最佳的离子直径大小范围,用于识别和评估局部中间离子形成(LIIF)的强度。中间离子形成(IIF)是指通过 NPF 形成的中间离子,而本地则是指在测量点附近(如 500 米至 1 公里范围内),即在本地,由较小的离子群形成的中间离子。我们发现,迁移率直径范围在 2.0-2.3 nm 的离子最适合检测 LIIF。该尺寸范围内的离子浓度表明 IIF 的速率较高,而且与较大的离子相比,增长的离子所经过的潜在距离较小。此外,在 Hyytiälä,负离子浓度比正离子浓度对 IIF 更敏感,这是因为 IIF 期间与背景之间的浓度差异较大。因此,我们建议将直径为 2.0-2.3 nm 的离子浓度作为识别和评估 LIIF 强度的最佳选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信