Comparison and evaluation of hydrologic performance of satellite, reanalysis and climate model-based precipitation products in the Upper Awash River Basin, Ethiopia

Salih Duri Abdulahi, Sead Burhan Husen, A. Muleta
{"title":"Comparison and evaluation of hydrologic performance of satellite, reanalysis and climate model-based precipitation products in the Upper Awash River Basin, Ethiopia","authors":"Salih Duri Abdulahi, Sead Burhan Husen, A. Muleta","doi":"10.2166/wpt.2024.134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n A number of open-source precipitation products offer viable options for hydrological simulation in the absence/limited rain gauge station networks. This study examined the hydrologic performance of reanalysis (CFSR), satellite (CHIRPS) and regional climate model (RACMO22T) based precipitation estimates through Hydrologiska Byråns Vattenbalansavdelning (HBV) model. The performance of these precipitation products were evaluated by the graphical and statistical indices such as coefficient of determination (R2), Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE), percentage of bias (PBIAS), and mean square error (RMSE) at daily and monthly scales. RACMO22T precipitation product was competent based on all the evaluation statistical indices criteria to simulate flow whereas; CHIRPS and CFSR were unsatisfactory based on the PBIAS and RSME. Flow duration curves indicated that, RACMO22T was able to better estimate high, medium and low flow than CHIRPS and CFSR. The outcome suggested that, RACMO22T is thought to be a more feasible option for the hydrologic simulation than CHIRPS and CFSR in the UARB. Furthermore, the hydrologic performance was improved on monthly scales than daily for all precipitation products. The study therefore, suggested that the use of regional climate model based precipitation products for hydrologic simulation would be of great benefit considering the difficulties in accessing data across and similar basin.","PeriodicalId":104096,"journal":{"name":"Water Practice & Technology","volume":"28 19","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water Practice & Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2166/wpt.2024.134","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A number of open-source precipitation products offer viable options for hydrological simulation in the absence/limited rain gauge station networks. This study examined the hydrologic performance of reanalysis (CFSR), satellite (CHIRPS) and regional climate model (RACMO22T) based precipitation estimates through Hydrologiska Byråns Vattenbalansavdelning (HBV) model. The performance of these precipitation products were evaluated by the graphical and statistical indices such as coefficient of determination (R2), Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE), percentage of bias (PBIAS), and mean square error (RMSE) at daily and monthly scales. RACMO22T precipitation product was competent based on all the evaluation statistical indices criteria to simulate flow whereas; CHIRPS and CFSR were unsatisfactory based on the PBIAS and RSME. Flow duration curves indicated that, RACMO22T was able to better estimate high, medium and low flow than CHIRPS and CFSR. The outcome suggested that, RACMO22T is thought to be a more feasible option for the hydrologic simulation than CHIRPS and CFSR in the UARB. Furthermore, the hydrologic performance was improved on monthly scales than daily for all precipitation products. The study therefore, suggested that the use of regional climate model based precipitation products for hydrologic simulation would be of great benefit considering the difficulties in accessing data across and similar basin.
埃塞俄比亚阿瓦什河上游流域卫星、再分析和基于气候模式的降水产品的水文性能比较与评估
在没有雨量站网络或雨量站网络有限的情况下,许多开源降水产品为水文模拟提供了可行的选择。本研究通过水文模型(HBV)检验了基于再分析(CFSR)、卫星(CHIRPS)和区域气候模型(RACMO22T)的降水估算的水文性能。这些降水产品的性能通过图形和统计指标进行评估,如日和月尺度的判定系数(R2)、纳什-苏克里夫效率(NSE)、偏差百分比(PBIAS)和均方误差(RMSE)。根据所有评价统计指标标准,RACMO22T 降水量产品能够模拟流量,而根据 PBIAS 和 RSME,CHIRPS 和 CFSR 不能令人满意。流量持续时间曲线表明,与 CHIRPS 和 CFSR 相比,RACMO22T 能够更好地估计大、中、小流量。结果表明,在 UARB 的水文模拟中,RACMO22T 比 CHIRPS 和 CFSR 更为可行。此外,所有降水产品的水文性能在月尺度上均优于日尺度。因此,考虑到跨流域和类似流域获取数据的困难,这项研究建议使用基于区域气候模式的降水产品进行水文模拟将大有裨益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信