Prevalence and associated factors of family planning among students of health training institutes in Juba: A cross sectional descriptive study

Kon Alier, Ezbon WApary, Akway Cham, Rita Tulba, Lueth Garang, Abdallah Malual, Tumalu Angok, Achol Ajuet, Aldo Kuot, Donato Akuei
{"title":"Prevalence and associated factors of family planning among students of health training institutes in Juba: A cross sectional descriptive study","authors":"Kon Alier, Ezbon WApary, Akway Cham, Rita Tulba, Lueth Garang, Abdallah Malual, Tumalu Angok, Achol Ajuet, Aldo Kuot, Donato Akuei","doi":"10.4314/ssmj.v17i2.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Family planning (FP) is less prevalent in South Sudan yet information on the subject is scarce and varied from one source to another. This study assessed the prevalence and associated factors in family planning among students at health science training institutes in Juba City. \nMethod: This was a cross-sectional survey of students’ self-reported utilisation of FP methods. Four hundred randomly selected students from five health training institutes (HTIs) in Juba City participated. Data collection was done using a pretested structured questionnaire. IBM SPSS 23 software was used for data analysis. Chi squared tests and regression analyses were performed to determine the associated factors. \nResults: Among the 400 participants, the lifetime prevalence of FP methods was 77.3%, of which modern contraceptive use was 22%. FP was more prevalent among participants aged 45-50 (85.7%) and females (80.7%). Eighty-seven percent of divorced couples and 91.3% of traditional believers reported practicing FP. More nursing/midwifery cadres within the professional category reported practicing FP, as well as 90.4% of rural respondents. Eighty-three percent of respondents working in pharmacies said they practice FP, compared to 68.1% of those working in clinics. FP practice was similar among participants who were aware (78.9%) and those who denied being aware (72.5%). Marital status (p < 0.001), religion (p < 0.001), residence (p < 0.001), and place of work (p = 0.037) were significantly associated with FP. \nConclusion: The prevalence of family planning among students at Health Training Institutes in Juba City is high compared to national estimates, but the contraceptive overall prevalence rate is still low. It is significantly associated with marital status, religion, residence, and place of work. There is a need to continue the effort.","PeriodicalId":56200,"journal":{"name":"South Sudan Medical Journal","volume":"56 42","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South Sudan Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/ssmj.v17i2.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Family planning (FP) is less prevalent in South Sudan yet information on the subject is scarce and varied from one source to another. This study assessed the prevalence and associated factors in family planning among students at health science training institutes in Juba City. Method: This was a cross-sectional survey of students’ self-reported utilisation of FP methods. Four hundred randomly selected students from five health training institutes (HTIs) in Juba City participated. Data collection was done using a pretested structured questionnaire. IBM SPSS 23 software was used for data analysis. Chi squared tests and regression analyses were performed to determine the associated factors. Results: Among the 400 participants, the lifetime prevalence of FP methods was 77.3%, of which modern contraceptive use was 22%. FP was more prevalent among participants aged 45-50 (85.7%) and females (80.7%). Eighty-seven percent of divorced couples and 91.3% of traditional believers reported practicing FP. More nursing/midwifery cadres within the professional category reported practicing FP, as well as 90.4% of rural respondents. Eighty-three percent of respondents working in pharmacies said they practice FP, compared to 68.1% of those working in clinics. FP practice was similar among participants who were aware (78.9%) and those who denied being aware (72.5%). Marital status (p < 0.001), religion (p < 0.001), residence (p < 0.001), and place of work (p = 0.037) were significantly associated with FP. Conclusion: The prevalence of family planning among students at Health Training Institutes in Juba City is high compared to national estimates, but the contraceptive overall prevalence rate is still low. It is significantly associated with marital status, religion, residence, and place of work. There is a need to continue the effort.
朱巴卫生培训机构学生中计划生育的流行率和相关因素:横断面描述性研究
导言:计划生育(FP)在南苏丹不太普遍,但有关该主题的信息却很少,而且来源各异。本研究评估了朱巴市卫生科学培训机构学生中计划生育的普及率和相关因素。调查方法这是一项针对学生自我报告的计划生育方法使用情况的横断面调查。来自朱巴市五所卫生培训学院(HTIs)的四百名随机抽取的学生参加了调查。数据收集采用了一份预先测试过的结构化问卷。数据分析使用了 IBM SPSS 23 软件。为确定相关因素,进行了卡方检验和回归分析。结果:在 400 名参与者中,一生中使用 FP 方法的比例为 77.3%,其中使用现代避孕药具的比例为 22%。在 45-50 岁的参与者(85.7%)和女性(80.7%)中,使用 FP 的比例较高。87%的离异夫妇和 91.3%的传统信徒表示使用过 FP。更多专业类别中的护理/助产士以及 90.4%的农村受访者都报告说实行了计划生育。在药房工作的受访者中有 83%的人表示自己实行计划生育,而在诊所工作的受访者中这一比例为 68.1%。知晓计划生育的受访者(78.9%)和否认知晓计划生育的受访者(72.5%)在计划生育方面的做法相似。婚姻状况(p < 0.001)、宗教信仰(p < 0.001)、居住地(p < 0.001)和工作地点(p = 0.037)与 FP 有显著相关性。结论与全国估计值相比,朱巴市卫生培训学院学生的计划生育普及率较高,但避孕药具的总体普及率仍然较低。这与婚姻状况、宗教信仰、居住地和工作地点有很大关系。有必要继续努力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信