The English education system: undervalued and over-measured

Anna Vignoles
{"title":"The English education system: undervalued and over-measured","authors":"Anna Vignoles","doi":"10.5871/jba/012.a21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThe economic value of education is widely known. However, policymakers, despite recognising its economic benefits in theory, in practice treat education spending and school funding as a cost. In the English context, this has led to a shortfall in investment in education, training and skills. The prevailing characterisation of education as a cost obscures its genuine societal and economic value, and there is a particular need for better measurement of its social benefits, including human capital, in terms of health, civic participation, and well-being. This article explores the consequences of downplaying the investment role of education, which include cuts in real-terms education spending despite trying to pursue an economic growth agenda, and increases in educational and income inequality. The current (burdensome) accountability system then adds to the problem of underinvestment, measuring as it does only a narrow range of academic outcomes. Its high-stakes approach also appears to be undermining the desirability of teaching as a profession, which will be detrimental to education quality. This article discusses potential solutions, advocating for a comprehensive and long-term approach to education planning and measuring outcomes beyond traditional academic metrics. It urges a paradigm shift in perceiving education as a sustained, lifelong investment, necessitating strategic systemwide planning, cross-party consensus and, above all, a commitment to valuing the education system and its workforce. The article arises from a British Academy Lecture delivered in November 2022.\n","PeriodicalId":93790,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the British Academy","volume":"7 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the British Academy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5871/jba/012.a21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The economic value of education is widely known. However, policymakers, despite recognising its economic benefits in theory, in practice treat education spending and school funding as a cost. In the English context, this has led to a shortfall in investment in education, training and skills. The prevailing characterisation of education as a cost obscures its genuine societal and economic value, and there is a particular need for better measurement of its social benefits, including human capital, in terms of health, civic participation, and well-being. This article explores the consequences of downplaying the investment role of education, which include cuts in real-terms education spending despite trying to pursue an economic growth agenda, and increases in educational and income inequality. The current (burdensome) accountability system then adds to the problem of underinvestment, measuring as it does only a narrow range of academic outcomes. Its high-stakes approach also appears to be undermining the desirability of teaching as a profession, which will be detrimental to education quality. This article discusses potential solutions, advocating for a comprehensive and long-term approach to education planning and measuring outcomes beyond traditional academic metrics. It urges a paradigm shift in perceiving education as a sustained, lifelong investment, necessitating strategic systemwide planning, cross-party consensus and, above all, a commitment to valuing the education system and its workforce. The article arises from a British Academy Lecture delivered in November 2022.
英国教育体系:价值被低估,衡量标准被高估
教育的经济价值广为人知。然而,政策制定者尽管在理论上承认教育的经济效益,但在实践中却将教育支出和学校经费视为一种成本。在英国,这导致了教育、培训和技能方面的投资不足。将教育普遍定性为成本的做法掩盖了其真正的社会和经济价值,尤其需要更好地衡量其社会效益,包括在健康、公民参与和福祉方面的人力资本。本文探讨了淡化教育的投资作用所带来的后果,其中包括在努力追求经济增长议程的同时削减实际教育支出,以及教育和收入不平等的加剧。现行的(繁重的)问责制度则加剧了投资不足的问题,因为它只衡量范围狭窄的学术成果。其高风险的方法似乎也在削弱教师这一职业的可取性,这将不利于教育质量的提高。本文讨论了潜在的解决方案,主张在教育规划和成果衡量方面采取全面、长期的方法,而不局限于传统的学术指标。文章敦促转变范式,将教育视为一项持续的终身投资,这就需要进行全系统的战略规划,达成跨党派共识,最重要的是,承诺重视教育系统及其工作人员。这篇文章源自英国科学院于 2022 年 11 月发表的演讲。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信