Reconceptualizing accountability in NGO-corporate partnerships: an institutional logics perspective

Chaudhry Ghafran, Sofia Yasmin
{"title":"Reconceptualizing accountability in NGO-corporate partnerships: an institutional logics perspective","authors":"Chaudhry Ghafran, Sofia Yasmin","doi":"10.1108/aaaj-02-2023-6276","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeDeveloping economies often lack sufficient state regulation to encourage corporations to engage with environmental sustainability challenges. Environmental NGOs fill this vacuum but this relationship is fraught with challenges, linked to each party’s competing interests. This paper examines how an environmental NGO operating in a developing country manages such challenges.Design/methodology/approachA longitudinal case study, from 2017–2022, based on semi-structured interviews and documentary analysis, with the main periods of field work in 2017 and 2020.FindingsWe unravel nuanced dynamics of accountability within an NGOs collaborative ecosystem. Our findings reveal a web of interlinked obligations and expectations, strategically adopted to reconcile environmental and CSR logics fostering trustworthy partnerships with firms. Despite aiming for transformative change, the NGO made gradual initiatives, to meet the challenges of fostering systemic change in developing nations. Institutional logics of professionalism and development allowed NGO members avoid mission drift and realign upward accountability relations into lateral ones.Originality/valueThe study provides insight into successful NGO-corporate partnerships and illustrates how accountability is negotiated, upheld, and reconceptualized in such collaborations.","PeriodicalId":132341,"journal":{"name":"Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/aaaj-02-2023-6276","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeDeveloping economies often lack sufficient state regulation to encourage corporations to engage with environmental sustainability challenges. Environmental NGOs fill this vacuum but this relationship is fraught with challenges, linked to each party’s competing interests. This paper examines how an environmental NGO operating in a developing country manages such challenges.Design/methodology/approachA longitudinal case study, from 2017–2022, based on semi-structured interviews and documentary analysis, with the main periods of field work in 2017 and 2020.FindingsWe unravel nuanced dynamics of accountability within an NGOs collaborative ecosystem. Our findings reveal a web of interlinked obligations and expectations, strategically adopted to reconcile environmental and CSR logics fostering trustworthy partnerships with firms. Despite aiming for transformative change, the NGO made gradual initiatives, to meet the challenges of fostering systemic change in developing nations. Institutional logics of professionalism and development allowed NGO members avoid mission drift and realign upward accountability relations into lateral ones.Originality/valueThe study provides insight into successful NGO-corporate partnerships and illustrates how accountability is negotiated, upheld, and reconceptualized in such collaborations.
重新认识非政府组织与企业伙伴关系中的问责制:制度逻辑视角
目的发展中经济体往往缺乏足够的国家监管来鼓励企业应对环境可持续性挑战。非政府环保组织填补了这一真空,但这种关系充满了挑战,与各方相互竞争的利益相关。本文探讨了一个在发展中国家开展活动的环保非政府组织如何应对这些挑战。设计/方法/途径2017-2022 年的一项纵向案例研究,基于半结构式访谈和文献分析,实地工作的主要时期为 2017 年和 2020 年。研究结果我们揭示了一个非政府组织合作生态系统中细微的问责动态。我们的研究结果揭示了相互关联的义务和期望网络,这些义务和期望被战略性地采用,以协调环境和企业社会责任逻辑,促进与企业建立值得信赖的伙伴关系。尽管该非政府组织的目标是变革,但它还是采取了循序渐进的举措,以应对在发展中国家促进系统性变革的挑战。专业化和发展的制度逻辑使非政府组织成员避免了使命漂移,并将向上的问责关系调整为横向的问责关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信