Effect of using multiple representations in teaching mechanics problem-solving on engineering students’ academic performance in Rwanda

Q3 Social Sciences
Niyomufasha Theogene, Celestin Ntivuguruzwa, L. Mugabo
{"title":"Effect of using multiple representations in teaching mechanics problem-solving on engineering students’ academic performance in Rwanda","authors":"Niyomufasha Theogene, Celestin Ntivuguruzwa, L. Mugabo","doi":"10.1088/1361-6552/ad4944","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In recent years, the use of multiple representations in physics teaching and learning has become more common. This study sought to determine if engineering students’ performance in Rwanda might be improved by the use of numerous representations when solving mechanics problems. Multiple representations improve students’ comprehension and recall of mechanics ideas, supporting efficient teaching methods and critical thinking. This study employed a quasi-experimental research design with pre-and post-test control and experimental groups. A total of 100 students were enrolled in the study, divided into two groups: the experimental group consisted of 52 students who received instruction using multiple representations, and the control group consisted of 48 students who received instruction using traditional methods. In the study, students’ performance was measured before and after intervention using a mechanics test. The mechanics problem-solving pre-test findings indicated a p-value greater than 0.05 between the control and experimental groups, indicating no statistically significant differences between the two groups. A post-test revealed a p-value < 0.001 between the groups, indicating that the experimental group outperformed the control group significantly. According to the findings, engineering student’s academic performance in physics can be improved through the use of multiple representations in teaching and learning mechanics problem-solving. This study will support the development of Rwandan education policies, instructional approaches, and global pedagogy are all supported by this study.","PeriodicalId":39773,"journal":{"name":"Physics Education","volume":"64 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physics Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6552/ad4944","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In recent years, the use of multiple representations in physics teaching and learning has become more common. This study sought to determine if engineering students’ performance in Rwanda might be improved by the use of numerous representations when solving mechanics problems. Multiple representations improve students’ comprehension and recall of mechanics ideas, supporting efficient teaching methods and critical thinking. This study employed a quasi-experimental research design with pre-and post-test control and experimental groups. A total of 100 students were enrolled in the study, divided into two groups: the experimental group consisted of 52 students who received instruction using multiple representations, and the control group consisted of 48 students who received instruction using traditional methods. In the study, students’ performance was measured before and after intervention using a mechanics test. The mechanics problem-solving pre-test findings indicated a p-value greater than 0.05 between the control and experimental groups, indicating no statistically significant differences between the two groups. A post-test revealed a p-value < 0.001 between the groups, indicating that the experimental group outperformed the control group significantly. According to the findings, engineering student’s academic performance in physics can be improved through the use of multiple representations in teaching and learning mechanics problem-solving. This study will support the development of Rwandan education policies, instructional approaches, and global pedagogy are all supported by this study.
在卢旺达力学问题解决教学中使用多重表征对工科学生学习成绩的影响
近年来,在物理教学中使用多种表征已变得越来越普遍。本研究旨在确定在解决力学问题时使用多重表征是否能提高卢旺达工科学生的成绩。多重表征可以提高学生对力学思想的理解和记忆,支持高效的教学方法和批判性思维。本研究采用了准实验研究设计,分为前后测试对照组和实验组。共有 100 名学生参加了研究,分为两组:实验组由 52 名学生组成,他们接受了使用多重表征的教学;对照组由 48 名学生组成,他们接受了使用传统方法的教学。在研究中,学生的成绩在干预前后通过力学测试进行测量。力学问题解决前测结果显示,对照组和实验组之间的 p 值大于 0.05,表明两组之间没有显著的统计学差异。后测结果显示,两组之间的 p 值小于 0.001,表明实验组的成绩明显优于对照组。研究结果表明,工科学生的物理学习成绩可以通过在力学问题解决的教与学中使用多重表征来提高。这项研究将为卢旺达教育政策、教学方法和全球教学法的发展提供支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Physics Education
Physics Education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
195
期刊介绍: Physics Education seeks to serve the physics teaching community and we welcome contributions from teachers. We seek to support the teaching of physics to students aged 11 up to introductory undergraduate level. We aim to provide professional development and support for teachers of physics around the world by providing: a forum for practising teachers to make an active contribution to the physics teaching community; knowledge updates in physics, educational research and relevant wider curriculum developments; and strategies for teaching and classroom management that will engage and motivate students.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信