Clinical trials radiographers identifying priority challenges associated with implementing a national programme of clinical trials in the UK’s first proton beam therapy Centre

BJR|Open Pub Date : 2024-05-23 DOI:10.1093/bjro/tzae012
Lucy Siew Chen Davies, L. Mchugh, Sally Falk, Jacqui Bridge, P. Fendall Amaro, L. Whiteside, Rachael Bailey, Julie Webb, Cynthia L Eccles
{"title":"Clinical trials radiographers identifying priority challenges associated with implementing a national programme of clinical trials in the UK’s first proton beam therapy Centre","authors":"Lucy Siew Chen Davies, L. Mchugh, Sally Falk, Jacqui Bridge, P. Fendall Amaro, L. Whiteside, Rachael Bailey, Julie Webb, Cynthia L Eccles","doi":"10.1093/bjro/tzae012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n This paper is an evaluation of the current trial processes within a national proton beam therapy (PBT) clinical trial service in the UK. The work within the paper identifies priority challenges associated with the implementation of PBT trials with a view to improving patient trial processes.\n \n \n \n The nominal group technique (NGT) was used. Five Clinical Trials Radiographers were asked the target question “what are the major challenges when implementing PBT clinical trials and facilitating PBT trial-related activities?” Participants individually and silently listed their challenges to the target question. Following this, group discussion clarified and refined responses. Participants then individually selected five challenges that they deemed most pertinent to the target question, giving a weighted score (out of 10). Individual scores were combined to provide a ranked, weighted order of challenges. Further group discussion identified improvement strategies to the highest scored challenges.\n \n \n \n After combining lists generated by participants, 59 challenges were identified. Group discussion eliminated 27 responses. Eighteen were merged, resulting in 14 challenges. The two challenges that ranked highest were: i) lack of initial understanding of the responsibilities of teams and who the relevant stakeholders were, ii) that a national PBT service requires the provision of shared care across multi-disciplinary teams and sites. Improvement areas include the development of shared protocols, clarifying stakeholder responsibilities and improving communication between centres to streamline PBT trial processes.\n \n \n \n This work has identified priority areas requiring development to improve the conduct of a national PBT clinical trials programme.\n \n \n \n This is the first publication to evaluate current clinical trial processes for the UK’s PBT service.\n","PeriodicalId":516196,"journal":{"name":"BJR|Open","volume":"11 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJR|Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjro/tzae012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper is an evaluation of the current trial processes within a national proton beam therapy (PBT) clinical trial service in the UK. The work within the paper identifies priority challenges associated with the implementation of PBT trials with a view to improving patient trial processes. The nominal group technique (NGT) was used. Five Clinical Trials Radiographers were asked the target question “what are the major challenges when implementing PBT clinical trials and facilitating PBT trial-related activities?” Participants individually and silently listed their challenges to the target question. Following this, group discussion clarified and refined responses. Participants then individually selected five challenges that they deemed most pertinent to the target question, giving a weighted score (out of 10). Individual scores were combined to provide a ranked, weighted order of challenges. Further group discussion identified improvement strategies to the highest scored challenges. After combining lists generated by participants, 59 challenges were identified. Group discussion eliminated 27 responses. Eighteen were merged, resulting in 14 challenges. The two challenges that ranked highest were: i) lack of initial understanding of the responsibilities of teams and who the relevant stakeholders were, ii) that a national PBT service requires the provision of shared care across multi-disciplinary teams and sites. Improvement areas include the development of shared protocols, clarifying stakeholder responsibilities and improving communication between centres to streamline PBT trial processes. This work has identified priority areas requiring development to improve the conduct of a national PBT clinical trials programme. This is the first publication to evaluate current clinical trial processes for the UK’s PBT service.
临床试验放射技师确定与在英国首个质子束治疗中心实施国家临床试验计划有关的优先挑战
本文对英国国家质子束治疗(PBT)临床试验服务的现行试验流程进行了评估。论文中的工作确定了与实施质子束疗法试验相关的重点挑战,以期改善患者的试验流程。 本文采用了名义小组技术(NGT)。五名临床试验放射技师被问到一个目标问题:"在实施 PBT 临床试验和促进 PBT 试验相关活动时,面临的主要挑战是什么?参与者针对目标问题各自默默地列出了他们所面临的挑战。随后,小组讨论对回答进行了澄清和完善。然后,与会者各自选出他们认为与目标问题最相关的五项挑战,并给出加权分数(满分 10 分)。将个人得分合并,得出挑战的加权排序。小组进一步讨论确定了针对得分最高挑战的改进策略。 在综合了参与者提出的清单后,确定了 59 项挑战。小组讨论淘汰了 27 个答复。合并了 18 项,得出 14 项挑战。得分最高的两个挑战是:i) 缺乏对团队职责和相关利益方的初步了解;ii) 全国性的 PBT 服务要求跨学科团队和医疗点提供共同护理。改进领域包括制定共享协议、明确利益相关者的责任、改善中心之间的沟通以简化 PBT 试验流程。 这项工作确定了需要优先发展的领域,以改进全国 PBT 临床试验计划的实施。 这是第一份评估英国 PBT 服务当前临床试验流程的出版物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信