The Dopamine Hypothesis as a Causal Explanation of Schizophrenia

Maria Chanioti, Georgios Lyrakos, Georgios Pilafas
{"title":"The Dopamine Hypothesis as a Causal Explanation of Schizophrenia","authors":"Maria Chanioti, Georgios Lyrakos, Georgios Pilafas","doi":"10.52403/ijshr.20240205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Schizophrenia, a severe psychiatric disorder, profoundly impacts individuals, families, and society, characterized by symptoms such as delusions, hallucinations, disorganized thinking, speech, and motor behavior, as outlined in the DSM-5 criteria. Coined by Eugen Bleuler in 1911 to emphasize fragmented cognition, the term \"schizophrenia\" replaced Emile Kraepelin's \"dementia praecox\"(1908) reflecting its chronic nature, with an estimated prevalence of 1% in the general population and a significant heritability rate of around 79%. The dopamine hypothesis, central to schizophrenia research, suggests heightened dopaminergic transmission as a primary factor in its development, supported by the efficacy of antipsychotic drugs targeting dopamine receptors. However, recent studies have revealed complexities beyond dopamine dysfunction, including the glutamate hypothesis, which proposes deficits in glutamate activity as an alternative explanation. This essay critically evaluates the dopamine hypothesis within the broader biopsychosocial framework, emphasizing the interaction of biological, psychological, and social factors in schizophrenia etiology. Despite its foundational role, the dopamine hypothesis has limitations in fully clarifying the multifaceted nature of schizophrenia, highlighting the need for comprehensive approaches integrating diverse perspectives and methodologies to enhance understanding of this complex disorder.\n\nKeywords: Dopamine Hypothesis, Schizophrenia, Mental Illness, Psychotic Symptoms, GENE x ENVIROMENT Interaction","PeriodicalId":14300,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Science and Healthcare Research","volume":"19 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Science and Healthcare Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52403/ijshr.20240205","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Schizophrenia, a severe psychiatric disorder, profoundly impacts individuals, families, and society, characterized by symptoms such as delusions, hallucinations, disorganized thinking, speech, and motor behavior, as outlined in the DSM-5 criteria. Coined by Eugen Bleuler in 1911 to emphasize fragmented cognition, the term "schizophrenia" replaced Emile Kraepelin's "dementia praecox"(1908) reflecting its chronic nature, with an estimated prevalence of 1% in the general population and a significant heritability rate of around 79%. The dopamine hypothesis, central to schizophrenia research, suggests heightened dopaminergic transmission as a primary factor in its development, supported by the efficacy of antipsychotic drugs targeting dopamine receptors. However, recent studies have revealed complexities beyond dopamine dysfunction, including the glutamate hypothesis, which proposes deficits in glutamate activity as an alternative explanation. This essay critically evaluates the dopamine hypothesis within the broader biopsychosocial framework, emphasizing the interaction of biological, psychological, and social factors in schizophrenia etiology. Despite its foundational role, the dopamine hypothesis has limitations in fully clarifying the multifaceted nature of schizophrenia, highlighting the need for comprehensive approaches integrating diverse perspectives and methodologies to enhance understanding of this complex disorder. Keywords: Dopamine Hypothesis, Schizophrenia, Mental Illness, Psychotic Symptoms, GENE x ENVIROMENT Interaction
多巴胺假说作为精神分裂症的病因解释
精神分裂症是一种严重的精神障碍,对个人、家庭和社会都有深远的影响,其特征是妄想、幻觉、思维、言语和运动行为紊乱等症状,正如 DSM-5 标准所概述的那样。精神分裂症 "一词是由欧根-布勒勒(Eugen Bleuler)于 1911 年创造的,意在强调片段化的认知,该词取代了埃米尔-克拉佩林(Emile Kraepelin)的 "早老性痴呆"(1908 年),反映了精神分裂症的慢性性质,估计其在普通人群中的发病率为 1%,遗传率约为 79%。多巴胺假说是精神分裂症研究的核心,该假说认为多巴胺能传递增强是精神分裂症发病的主要因素,以多巴胺受体为靶点的抗精神病药物的疗效也证明了这一点。然而,最近的研究揭示了多巴胺功能障碍之外的复杂性,包括谷氨酸假说,该假说提出谷氨酸活性缺陷作为另一种解释。本文在更广泛的生物-心理-社会框架内对多巴胺假说进行了批判性评估,强调了精神分裂症病因中生物、心理和社会因素的相互作用。尽管多巴胺假说具有奠基性作用,但它在全面阐明精神分裂症的多面性方面仍有局限性,这凸显了综合不同视角和方法论来加深对这一复杂疾病的理解的必要性:多巴胺假说 精神分裂症 精神疾病 精神症状 基因 x 环境相互作用
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信