Improving carbon management through maximizing hydrolysis and fermentation at water resource recovery facilities

Francesca Cecconi, Leah Pifer, Fabrizio Sabba, Leon Downing
{"title":"Improving carbon management through maximizing hydrolysis and fermentation at water resource recovery facilities","authors":"Francesca Cecconi, Leah Pifer, Fabrizio Sabba, Leon Downing","doi":"10.3389/fenve.2024.1378621","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Wastewater treatment plants are transitioning from a sole focus on treatment objectives to integrated resource recovery and upcycling. Effective carbon management is critical for upcycling within a water resource recovery facility (WRRF) to produce energy or other usable products, which involves carbon diversion at primary treatment and waste activated sludge (WAS) from biological treatment processes. Many WRRFs are also driven to meet stringent effluent nutrient discharge targets while minimizing energy usage and chemical addition. Nutrient removal systems still rely on biodegradable organic carbon to support denitrification and enhanced biological phosphorus removal (EBPR). Biological nutrient removal not only requires sufficient organic substrate, but also the right type of bioavailable carbon for optimal utilization. The main objective of this pilot fermentation testing was to evaluate the most effective utilization of the range of organic-carbon rich feedstocks within a WRRF. Preliminary results suggest that a 50–50 blend of primary sludge (PS) and return activated sludge (RAS) fermentation leads to highest volatile fatty acid (VFA) yield. PS fermentation resulted in the minimum nutrients release per unit of volatile suspended solids (VSS), which makes it a best suited for biological nutrients removal WRRFs with stringent nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) limits. The volatile fatty acids fractions produced from different combinations of RAS and PS can impact the most suitable end use for each sludge type fermentation. PS resulted into higher levels of propionate, which are ideal for selecting phosphate accumulating organisms (PAO) over glycogen-accumulating organisms (GAO). On the other hand, for denitrification, acetate is the preferred substrate, which was most abundant with RAS only fermentation. Our research outcomes will be of value to utilities aiming to integrate the stringent effluent nutrient (N and P) discharge targets with energy and resource recovery.","PeriodicalId":487591,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Environmental Engineering","volume":"20 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Environmental Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fenve.2024.1378621","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Wastewater treatment plants are transitioning from a sole focus on treatment objectives to integrated resource recovery and upcycling. Effective carbon management is critical for upcycling within a water resource recovery facility (WRRF) to produce energy or other usable products, which involves carbon diversion at primary treatment and waste activated sludge (WAS) from biological treatment processes. Many WRRFs are also driven to meet stringent effluent nutrient discharge targets while minimizing energy usage and chemical addition. Nutrient removal systems still rely on biodegradable organic carbon to support denitrification and enhanced biological phosphorus removal (EBPR). Biological nutrient removal not only requires sufficient organic substrate, but also the right type of bioavailable carbon for optimal utilization. The main objective of this pilot fermentation testing was to evaluate the most effective utilization of the range of organic-carbon rich feedstocks within a WRRF. Preliminary results suggest that a 50–50 blend of primary sludge (PS) and return activated sludge (RAS) fermentation leads to highest volatile fatty acid (VFA) yield. PS fermentation resulted in the minimum nutrients release per unit of volatile suspended solids (VSS), which makes it a best suited for biological nutrients removal WRRFs with stringent nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) limits. The volatile fatty acids fractions produced from different combinations of RAS and PS can impact the most suitable end use for each sludge type fermentation. PS resulted into higher levels of propionate, which are ideal for selecting phosphate accumulating organisms (PAO) over glycogen-accumulating organisms (GAO). On the other hand, for denitrification, acetate is the preferred substrate, which was most abundant with RAS only fermentation. Our research outcomes will be of value to utilities aiming to integrate the stringent effluent nutrient (N and P) discharge targets with energy and resource recovery.
通过最大限度地利用水资源回收设施的水解和发酵来改善碳管理
污水处理厂正在从只关注处理目标过渡到综合资源回收和循环利用。有效的碳管理对于在水资源回收设施(WRRF)内进行循环利用以生产能源或其他可用产品至关重要,这涉及到初级处理过程中的碳分流和生物处理过程中的废活性污泥(WAS)。许多水资源回收设施还必须满足严格的污水营养物排放目标,同时尽量减少能源使用和化学品添加。营养物去除系统仍然依赖可生物降解的有机碳来支持反硝化和强化生物除磷 (EBPR)。生物除磷不仅需要足够的有机基质,还需要适当类型的生物可利用碳以达到最佳利用率。本次试点发酵测试的主要目的是评估如何在 WRRF 内最有效地利用各种富含有机碳的原料。初步结果表明,初沉污泥(PS)和回流活性污泥(RAS)各占一半的混合发酵可获得最高的挥发性脂肪酸(VFA)产量。初沉污泥发酵产生的单位挥发性悬浮固体(VSS)营养物质释放量最小,因此最适合用于有严格氮(N)和磷(P)限制的生物营养物质去除 WRRF。RAS 和 PS 的不同组合产生的挥发性脂肪酸馏分会影响每种污泥类型发酵的最合适最终用途。PS 产生的丙酸含量较高,是选择磷酸盐积累型生物(PAO)而非糖原积累型生物(GAO)的理想选择。另一方面,在反硝化过程中,乙酸盐是首选底物,仅在 RAS 发酵过程中乙酸盐含量最高。我们的研究成果对旨在将严格的污水营养物(氮和磷)排放目标与能源和资源回收结合起来的公用事业公司很有价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信