Grain Sorghum Response to Simulated Fomesafen and Terbacil Carryover from Watermelons in Georgia

IF 1.3 3区 农林科学 Q3 AGRONOMY
Nicholas J. Shay, E. Prostko
{"title":"Grain Sorghum Response to Simulated Fomesafen and Terbacil Carryover from Watermelons in Georgia","authors":"Nicholas J. Shay, E. Prostko","doi":"10.1017/wet.2024.36","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Georgia growers can benefit from double-cropping grain sorghum following watermelon to maximize land use and add economic value to their operations. However, capitalizing on the economic advantages of harvesting two crops within a single season must account for potential herbicide injury to rotational crops. An integrated weed management strategy that includes a preplant application of fomesafen and terbacil is recommended for weed control in watermelon production systems. However, currently labeled plant-back restrictions for grain sorghum require a minimum of 10 and 24 months for fomesafen and terbacil, respectively. Therefore, this research aimed to determine the tolerance of grain sorghum to fomesafen and terbacil following soil applications applied 90 to 100 d before planting (DBP). Experiments were conducted at the University of Georgia Ponder Research Farm from 2019 to 2023. The experimental design was a randomized complete block with 4 replications. Five rates of fomesafen (35, 70, 140, 210, 280 g ai ha-1), four rates of terbacil (3.5, 7.0, 10.5, 14.0 g ai ha-1) and a non-treated control, were evaluated. In 2019, fomesafen caused significant sorghum leaf necrosis, plant density reductions, height reductions, and yield reductions of at least 16%, especially when applied at rates ≥ 210 g ai ha-1. Terbacil had little to no effect on sorghum injury, density, height, or yield in any year. These results suggest that sorghum has sufficient tolerance to terbacil when applied 90-100 DBP. In 4 of 5 years, sorghum had an acceptable tolerance to fomesafen when applied 90 to 100 DBP. However, yield losses observed in 2019 suggest that caution should be taken when fomesafen is applied 90 to 100 DBP grain sorghum at ≥ 210 g ai ha-1.","PeriodicalId":23710,"journal":{"name":"Weed Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Weed Technology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/wet.2024.36","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Georgia growers can benefit from double-cropping grain sorghum following watermelon to maximize land use and add economic value to their operations. However, capitalizing on the economic advantages of harvesting two crops within a single season must account for potential herbicide injury to rotational crops. An integrated weed management strategy that includes a preplant application of fomesafen and terbacil is recommended for weed control in watermelon production systems. However, currently labeled plant-back restrictions for grain sorghum require a minimum of 10 and 24 months for fomesafen and terbacil, respectively. Therefore, this research aimed to determine the tolerance of grain sorghum to fomesafen and terbacil following soil applications applied 90 to 100 d before planting (DBP). Experiments were conducted at the University of Georgia Ponder Research Farm from 2019 to 2023. The experimental design was a randomized complete block with 4 replications. Five rates of fomesafen (35, 70, 140, 210, 280 g ai ha-1), four rates of terbacil (3.5, 7.0, 10.5, 14.0 g ai ha-1) and a non-treated control, were evaluated. In 2019, fomesafen caused significant sorghum leaf necrosis, plant density reductions, height reductions, and yield reductions of at least 16%, especially when applied at rates ≥ 210 g ai ha-1. Terbacil had little to no effect on sorghum injury, density, height, or yield in any year. These results suggest that sorghum has sufficient tolerance to terbacil when applied 90-100 DBP. In 4 of 5 years, sorghum had an acceptable tolerance to fomesafen when applied 90 to 100 DBP. However, yield losses observed in 2019 suggest that caution should be taken when fomesafen is applied 90 to 100 DBP grain sorghum at ≥ 210 g ai ha-1.
谷物高粱对佐治亚州西瓜模拟福美双和特巴胂残留的反应
佐治亚州的种植者可以在种植西瓜后套种两茬谷物高粱,从而最大限度地利用土地,增加经济价值。不过,要充分利用在一季内收获两种作物的经济优势,必须考虑到轮作作物可能受到的除草剂伤害。建议在西瓜生产系统中采用综合杂草管理策略,包括在播种前施用福美双和特巴胂来控制杂草。然而,目前谷物高粱标注的回植限制要求福美双和特巴胂分别至少使用 10 个月和 24 个月。因此,本研究旨在确定谷物高粱在播种前 90 天至 100 天(DBP)施用福美双和特巴胂后对它们的耐受性。实验于 2019 年至 2023 年在佐治亚大学庞德研究农场进行。实验设计为随机完全区组,4 次重复。对五剂福美双(35、70、140、210、280 g ai ha-1)、四剂特菌唑(3.5、7.0、10.5、14.0 g ai ha-1)和未处理对照进行了评估。在 2019 年,福美双导致高粱叶片严重坏死、植株密度下降、高度降低,产量至少减少 16%,尤其是施用量≥ 210 g ai ha-1 时。在任何年份,特丁硫磷对高粱的伤害、密度、高度或产量几乎没有影响。这些结果表明,当施用量为 90-100 DBP 时,高粱对特菌唑有足够的耐受性。在 5 年中的 4 年,当施用 90-100 DBP 时,高粱对福美双的耐受性是可以接受的。然而,在 2019 年观察到的产量损失表明,在施用福美双 90 至 100 DBP 谷物高粱时,施用量≥ 210 g ai ha-1 时应谨慎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Weed Technology
Weed Technology 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
21.40%
发文量
89
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: Weed Technology publishes original research and scholarship in the form of peer-reviewed articles focused on understanding how weeds are managed. The journal focuses on: - Applied aspects concerning the management of weeds in agricultural systems - Herbicides used to manage undesired vegetation, weed biology and control - Weed/crop management systems - Reports of new weed problems -New technologies for weed management and special articles emphasizing technology transfer to improve weed control -Articles dealing with plant growth regulators and management of undesired plant growth may also be accepted, provided there is clear relevance to weed science technology, e.g., turfgrass or woody plant management along rights-of-way, vegetation management in forest, aquatic, or other non-crop situations. -Surveys, education, and extension topics related to weeds will also be considered
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信